Abstract
Engineered nanomaterials (ENMs) are now becoming a significant fraction of the material flows in the global economy. We are already reaping the benefits of improved energy efficiency, material use reduction, and better performance in many existing and new applications that have been enabled by these technological advances. As ENMs pervade the global economy, however, it becomes important to understand their environmental implications. As a first step, we combined ENM market information and material flow modeling to produce the first global assessment of the likely ENM emissions to the environment and landfills. The top ten most produced ENMs by mass were analyzed in a dozen major applications. Emissions during the manufacturing, use, and disposal stages were estimated, including intermediate steps through wastewater treatment plants and waste incineration plants. In 2010, silica, titania, alumina, and iron and zinc oxides dominate the ENM market in terms of mass flow through the global economy, used mostly in coatings/paints/pigments, electronics and optics, cosmetics, energy and environmental applications, and as catalysts. We estimate that 63–91 % of over 260,000–309,000 metric tons of global ENM production in 2010 ended up in landfills, with the balance released into soils (8–28 %), water bodies (0.4–7 %), and atmosphere (0.1–1.5 %). While there are considerable uncertainties in the estimates, the framework for estimating emissions can be easily improved as better data become available. The material flow estimates can be used to quantify emissions at the local level, as inputs for fate and transport models to estimate concentrations in different environmental compartments.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adeleye AS, Keller AA, Miller RJ, Lenihan HS (2013) Persistence of commercial nanoscaled zero-valent iron (nZVI) and by-products. J Nanopart Res
Alda J, Rico-García JM, López-Alonso JM, Boreman G (2005) Optical antennas for nano-photonic applications. Nanotechnology 16:S230
Avasthi DK, Mishra YK, Kabiraj D, Lalla NP, Pivin CJ (2007) Synthesis of metal–polymer nanocomposite for optical applications. Nanotechnology 18:125604
Baglioni P, Giorgi R (2006) Soft and hard nanomaterials for restoration and conservation of cultural heritage. Soft Matter 2:293–303
Baur J, Silverman E (2007) Challenges and opportunities in multifunctional nanocomposite structures for aerospace applications. MRS Bull 32:328–334
Benn TM, Westerhoff P (2008) Nanoparticle silver released into water from commercially available sock fabrics. Environ Sci Technol 42:4133–4139
Bigall NC, Herrmann A-K, Vogel M, Rose M, Simon P, Carrillo-Cabrera W, Dorfs D, Kaskel S, Gaponik N, Eychmüller A (2009) Hydrogels and aerogels from noble metal nanoparticles. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 48:9731–9734
Blasco C, Picó Y (2011) Determining nanomaterials in food. TrAC Trends Anal Chem 30:84–99
Blaser SA, Scheringer M, MacLeod M, Hungerbühler K (2008) Estimation of cumulative aquatic exposure and risk due to silver: contribution of nano-functionalized plastics and textiles. Sci Total Environ 390:396–409
Boisseau P, Loubaton B (2011) Nanomedicine, nanotechnology in medicine. CR Phys 12:620–636
Borchardt JK (2003) Nanotechnology providing new composites. Reinf Plast 47:36–39
Boxall A, Chaudhry Q, Sinclair C, Jones A, Aitken R, Jefferson B, Watts C (2007) Current and future predicted environmental exposure to engineered nanoparticles. York, UK
Coelho MC, Torro G, Emami N, Gracio J (2012) Nanotechnology in automotive industry: research strategy and trends for the future-small objects, big impacts. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 12:6621–6630
Damoiseaux R, George S, Li M, Pokhrel S, Ji Z, France B, Xia T, Suarez E, Rallo R, Madler L, Cohen Y, Hoek EMV, Nel A (2011) No time to lose-high throughput screening to assess nanomaterial safety. Nanoscale 3:1345–1360
DEFRA (2002) Sewage treatment in the UK, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, London, UK
Dhakras PA (2011) Nanotechnology applications in water purification and waste water treatment: a review. In: 2011 International Conference on Nanoscience, Engineering and Technology (ICONSET), pp 285–291
Dhoke SK, Sinha TJM, Khanna AS (2009) Effect of nano-Al2O3 particles on the corrosion behavior of alkyd based waterborne coatings. J Coat Technol Res 6:353–368
Ding B, Wang M, Wang X, Yu J, Sun G (2010) Electrospun nanomaterials for ultrasensitive sensors. Mater Today 13:16–27
Dionysiou D (2004) Environmental applications and implications of nanotechnology and nanomaterials. J Environ Eng 130:723–724
Domina T, Koch K (1997) The textile waste lifecycle. Cloth Text Res J 15:96–102
Du X, Graedel TE (2011) Uncovering the global life cycles of the rare earth elements. Sci Rep 1:145
Duncan B, Elci SG, Rotello VM (2012) Beyond biomarkers: identifying cell state using unbiased nanosensor arrays. Nano Today 7:228–230
Fairbairn EA, Keller AA, Mädler L, Zhou D, Pokhrel S, Cherr GN (2011) Metal oxide nanomaterials in seawater: linking physicochemical characteristics with biological response in sea urchin development. J Hazard Mater 192:1565–1571
Farokhzad OC, Langer R (2006) Nanomedicine: developing smarter therapeutic and diagnostic modalities. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 58:1456–1459
Future_Markets (2012) The global market for nanomaterials 2002–2006: production volumes, revenues and end use markets. Future Markets Inc., http://www.futuremarketsinc.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=176&Itemid=73
Gao J, Youn S, Hovsepyan A, Llaneza VL, Wang Y, Bitton G, Bonzongo J-CJ (2009) Dispersion and toxicity of selected manufactured nanomaterials in natural river water samples: effects of water chemical composition. Environ Sci Technol 43:3322–3328
Geranio L, Heuberger M, Nowack B (2009) The behavior of silver nanotextiles during washing. Environ Sci Technol 43:8113–8118
Gopalakrishnan K, Birgisson B, Taylor P, Attoh-Okine NO (2011) Nanotechnology in civil infrastructure: a paradigm shift. Springer, Berlin
Gottschalk F, Nowack B (2011) The release of engineered nanomaterials to the environment. J Environ Monit 13:1145–1155
Gottschalk F, Sonderer T, Scholz RW, Nowack B (2009) Modeled environmental concentrations of engineered nanomaterials (TiO2, ZnO, Ag, CNT, fullerenes) for different regions. Environ Sci Technol 43:9216–9222
Gottschalk F, Scholz RW, Nowack B (2010a) Probabilistic material flow modeling for assessing the environmental exposure to compounds: methodology and an application to engineered nano-TiO2 particles. Environ Model Softwar 25:320–332
Gottschalk F, Sonderer T, Scholz RW, Nowack B (2010b) Possibilities and limitations of modeling environmental exposure to engineered nanomaterials by probabilistic material flow analysis. Environ Toxicol Chem 29:1036–1048
Gruère GP (2012) Implications of nanotechnology growth in food and agriculture in OECD countries. Food Policy 37:191–198
Hashimoto S, Moriguchi Y (2004) Proposal of six indicators of material cycles for describing society’s metabolism: from the viewpoint of material flow analysis. Resour Conserv Recycl 40:185–200
Hassellöv M, Kaegi R (2009) Analysis and characterization of manufactured nanoparticles in aquatic environments. Environmental and Human Health Impacts of Nanotechnology. Wiley, Chichester, pp 211–266
Hendren CO, Mesnard X, Dröge J, Wiesner MR (2011) Estimating production data for five engineered nanomaterials as a basis for exposure assessment. Environ Sci Technol 45:2562–2569
Henkler F, Tralau T, Tentschert J, Kneuer C, Haase A, Platzek T, Luch A, Götz M (2012) Risk assessment of nanomaterials in cosmetics: a European union perspective. Arch Toxicol 86:1641–1646
Hsu L-Y, Chein H-M (2007) Evaluation of nanoparticle emissions for TiO2 nanopowder coating materials. J Nanopart Res 9:157–163
Kaegi R, Ulrich A, Sinnet B, Vonbank R, Wichser A, Zuleeg S, Simmler H, Brunner S, Vonmont H, Burkhardt M, Boller M (2008) Synthetic TiO2 nanoparticle emission from exterior facades into the aquatic environment. Environ Pollut 156:233–239
Kaiser J-P, Zuin S, Wick P (2013) Is nanotechnology revolutionizing the paint and lacquer industry? A critical opinion. Sci Total Environ 442:282–289
Keller AA, Wang H, Zhou D, Lenihan HS, Cherr G, Cardinale BJ, Miller R, Ji Z (2010) Stability and aggregation of metal oxide nanoparticles in natural aqueous matrices. Environ Sci Technol 44:1962–1967
Khanna AS (2008) Nanotechnology in high performance paint coatings. Asian J Exp Sci 22:25–32
Khanna V, Bakshi BR (2009) Carbon nanofiber polymer composites: evaluation of life cycle energy use. Environ Sci Technol 43:2078–2084
Kharisov BI, Kharissova OV (2010) Advances in nanotechnology in paper processing. Int J Green Nanotechnol Mater Sci Eng 2:M1–M8
Khin MM, Nair AS, Babu VJ, Murugan R, Ramakrishna S (2012) A review on nanomaterials for environmental remediation. Energy Environ Sci 5:8075–8109
Khot LR, Sankaran S, Maja JM, Ehsani R, Schuster EW (2012) Applications of nanomaterials in agricultural production and crop protection: a review. Crop Prot 35:64–70
Kiser MA, Westerhoff P, Benn T, Wang Y, Pérez-Rivera J, Hristovski K (2009) Titanium nanomaterial removal and release from wastewater treatment plants. Environ Sci Technol 43:6757–6763
Klaine SJ, Alvarez PJJ, Batley GE, Fernandes TF, Handy RD, Lyon DY, Mahendra S, McLaughlin MJ, Lead JR (2008) Nanomaterials in the environment: behavior, fate, bioavailability, and effects. Environ Toxicol Chem 27:1825–1851
Lanone S, Rogerieux F, Geys J, Dupont A, Maillot-Marechal E, Boczkowski J, Lacroix G, Hoet P (2009) Comparative toxicity of 24 manufactured nanoparticles in human alveolar epithelial and macrophage cell lines. Part Fibre Toxicol 6:1–12
Lee J, Mahendra S, Alvarez PJJ (2010) Nanomaterials in the construction industry: a review of their applications and environmental health and safety considerations. ACS Nano 4:3580–3590
Liu HH, Cohen Y (2012) Multimedia environmental distribution of nanomaterials. In: Nanotechnology 2012: bio sensors, instruments, medical, environment and energy, Nanotech 2012 vol 3. pp 304–306
Lopez-Moreno ML, de la Rosa G, Hernandez-Viezcas JA, Castillo-Michel H, Botez CE, Peralta-Videa JR, Gardea-Torresdey JL (2010) Evidence of the differential biotransformation and genotoxicity of ZnO and CeO2 nanoparticles on soybean (Glycine max) plants. Environ Sci Technol 44(19):7315–7320
Lowry GV, Espinasse BP, Badireddy AR, Richardson CJ, Reinsch BC, Bryant LD, Bone AJ, Deonarine A, Chae S, Therezien M, Colman BP, Hsu-Kim H, Bernhardt ES, Matson CW, Wiesner MR (2012a) Long-term transformation and fate of manufactured Ag nanoparticles in a simulated large scale freshwater emergent wetland. Environ Sci Technol 46:7027–7036
Lowry GV, Gregory KB, Apte SC, Lead JR (2012b) Transformations of nanomaterials in the environment. Environ Sci Technol 46:6891–6892
Marín S, Merkoçi A (2012) Nanomaterials based electrochemical sensing applications for safety and security. Electroanalysis 24:459–469
Mu L, Sprando R (2010) Application of nanotechnology in cosmetics. Pharm Res 27:1746–1749
Mueller NC, Nowack B (2008) Exposure modeling of engineered nanoparticles in the environment. Environ Sci Technol 42:4447–4453
Musee N (2011) Simulated environmental risk estimation of engineered nanomaterials: a case of cosmetics in Johannesburg City. Hum Exp Toxicol 30:1181–1195
Navarro E, Baun A, Behra R, Hartmann NB, Filser J, Miao AJ, Quigg A, Santschi PH, Sigg L (2008) Environmental behavior and ecotoxicity of engineered nanoparticles to algae, plants, and fungi. Ecotoxicology 17:372–386
O’Brien N, Cummins E (2010) Ranking initial environmental and human health risk resulting from environmentally relevant nanomaterials. J Environ Sci Health A 45:992–1007
Peckenham JM (2005) The use of biosolids in Maine: a review, prepared for Maine State Planning Office and the Maine Waste Water Control Association
Peralta-Videa JR, Zhao L, Lopez-Moreno ML, de la Rosa G, Hong J, Gardea-Torresdey JL (2011) Nanomaterials and the environment: a review for the biennium 2008–2010. J Hazard Mater 186:1–15
Petrov PD, Georgiev GL (2012) Fabrication of super-macroporous nanocomposites by deposition of carbon nanotubes onto polymer cryogels. Eur Polym J 48:1366–1373
Presting H, König U (2003) Future nanotechnology developments for automotive applications. Mater Sci Eng C 23:737–741
Qian L, Hinestroza J (2004) Application of nanotechnology for high performance textiles. J Text Appar Technol Manag 4:1–7
Reck BK, Graedel TE (2012) Challenges in metal recycling. Science 337:690–695
Sabitha M, Jose S, Raj S, Sumod U (2012) Nanotechnology in cosmetics: opportunities and challenges. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 4:186–193
Sahoo NG, Rana S, Cho JW, Li L, Chan SH (2010) Polymer nanocomposites based on functionalized carbon nanotubes. Prog Polym Sci 35:837–867
Salonitis K, Stavropoulos P, Chryssolouris G (2010) Nanotechnology for the needs of the automotive industry. Int J Nanomanuf 6:99–110
Savage N, Diallo MS (2005) Nanomaterials and water purification: opportunities and challenges. J Nanopart Res 7:331–342
Schmidt M (2008) The Sankey diagram in energy and material flow management. J Ind Ecol 12:82–94
Serrano E, Rus G, García-Martínez J (2009) Nanotechnology for sustainable energy. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 13:2373–2384
Shafer MM, Overdier JT, Armstong DE (1998) Removal, partitioning, and fate of silver and other metals in wastewater treatment plants and effluent-receiving streams. Environ Toxicol Chem 17:630–641
Shvedova AA, Kisin ER, Mercer R, Murray AR, Johnson VJ, Potapovich AI, Tyurina YY, Gorelik O, Arepalli S, Schwegler-Berry D, Hubbs AF, Antonini J, Evans DE, Ku B-K, Ramsey D, Maynard A, Kagan VE, Castranova V, Baron P (2005) Unusual inflammatory and fibrogenic pulmonary responses to single-walled carbon nanotubes in mice. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 289:L698–L708
Silvestre C, Duraccio D, Cimmino S (2011) Food packaging based on polymer nanomaterials. Prog Polym Sci 36:1766–1782
Singh P, Nanda A (2012) Nanotechnology in cosmetics: a boon or bane? Toxicol Environ Chem 94:1467–1479
Song L, Toth G, Vajtai R, Endo M, Ajayan PM (2012) Fabrication and characterization of single-walled carbon nanotube fiber for electronics applications. Carbon 50:5521–5524
Su S, Wu W, Gao J, Lu J, Fan C (2012) Nanomaterials-based sensors for applications in environmental monitoring. J Mater Chem 22:18101–18110
Subramanian V, Takhee L (2012) Nanotechnology-based flexible electronics. Nanotechnology 23:340201
Suh S, Yee S (2011) Phosphorus use-efficiency of agriculture and food system in the US. Chemosphere 84:806–813
Tan E, Yin P, Lang X, Wang X, You T, Guo L (2012) Functionalized gold nanoparticles as nanosensor for sensitive and selective detection of silver ions and silver nanoparticles by surface-enhanced Raman scattering. Analyst 137:3925–3928
Thomas CR, George S, Horst AM, Ji Z, Miller RJ, Peralta-Videa JR, Xia T, Pokhrel S, Mädler L, Gardea-Torresdey JL, Holden PA, Keller AA, Lenihan HS, Nel AE, Zink JI (2011) Nanomaterials in the environment: from materials to high-throughput screening to organisms. ACS Nano 5:13–20
United_Nations (2011) Municipal waste treatment. United Nations Statistics Division
Weiss J, Takhistov P, McClements DJ (2006) Functional materials in food nanotechnology. J Food Sci 71:R107–R116
Windler L, Lorenz C, von Goetz N, Hungerbühler K, Amberg M, Heuberger M, Nowack B (2012) Release of titanium dioxide from textiles during washing. Environ Sci Technol 46:8181–8188
Wong YWH, Yuen CWM, Leung MYS, Ku SKA, Lam HLI (2006) Selected applications of nanotechnology in textiles. AUTEX Res J 6:1–8
Xia T, Kovochich M, Liong M, Mädler L, Gilbert B, Shi H, Yeh JI, Zink JI, Nel AE (2008) Comparison of the mechanism of toxicity of zinc oxide and cerium oxide nanoparticles based on dissolution and oxidative stress properties. ACS Nano 2:2121–2134
Zhao L, Peralta-Videa JR, Varela-Ramirez A, Castillo-Michel H, Li C, Zhang J, Aguilera RJ, Keller AA, Gardea-Torresdey JL (2012) Effect of surface coating and organic matter on the uptake of CeO2 NPs by corn plants grown in soil: insight into the uptake mechanism. J. Hazard Mater. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.05.008
Zhou D, Keller AA (2010) Role of morphology in the aggregation kinetics of ZnO nanoparticles. Water Res 44:2948–2956
Zhou Z-Y, Tian N, Li J-T, Broadwell I, Sun S-G (2011) Nanomaterials of high surface energy with exceptional properties in catalysis and energy storage. Chem Soc Rev 40:4167–4185
Acknowledgments
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) and the US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) under Cooperative Agreement Number DBI-0830117. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of NSF or USEPA. This work has not been subjected to USEPA review, and no official endorsement should be inferred. The authors thank Michael Bostok for the d3.js script used to produce the Sankey diagrams.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Keller, A.A., McFerran, S., Lazareva, A. et al. Global life cycle releases of engineered nanomaterials . J Nanopart Res 15, 1692 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-013-1692-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-013-1692-4