Advertisement

Effect of silica shell thickness of Fe3O4–SiOx core–shell nanostructures on MRI contrast

  • Hrushikesh M. JoshiEmail author
  • Mrinmoy De
  • Felix Richter
  • Jiaqing He
  • P. V. Prasad
  • Vinayak P. DravidEmail author
Brief Communication

Abstract

Core–shell magnetic nanostructures (MNS) such as Fe3O4–SiOx, are being explored for their potential applications in biomedicine, such as a T2 (dark) contrast enhancement agent in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Herein, we present the effect of silica shell thickness on its r 2 relaxivity in MRI as it relates to other physical parameters. In this effort initially, monodispersed Fe3O4 MNS (nominally 9 nm size) were synthesized in organic phase via a simple chemical decomposition method. To study effect of shell thickness of silica of Fe3O4–SiOx core shell on r 2 relaxivity, the reverse micro-emulsion process was used to form silica coating of 5, 10 and 13 nm of silica shell around the MNS, while polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane was used to form very thin layer on the surface of MNS; synthesized nanostructures were characterized by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and high resolution TEM (HRTEM), superconducting quantum interference device magnetometry and MRI. Our observation suggests that, with increase in thickness of silica shell in Fe3O4–SiOx core–shell nanostructure, r 2 relaxivity decreases. The decrease in relaxivity could be attributed to increased distance between water molecules and magnetic core followed by change in the difference in Larmor frequencies (Δω) of water molecules. These results provide a rational basis for optimization of SiOx-coated MNS for biomedical applications.

Keywords

Magnetic nanoparticles T2 contrast agents Core–shell nanostructures Relaxivity MRI 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research is supported by the Center for Cancer Nanotechnology Excellence (CCNE) initiative of the National Institutes of Health’s National Cancer Institute under Award U54CA119341 at Northwestern University. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of the National Institutes of Health. Part of this work was performed in the EPIC/NIFTI facility of the NUANCE centre (supported by NSF-NSEC, NSFMRSEC, Keck Foundation, the State of Illinois, and Northwestern University) at Northwestern University. MRI measurements were performed at NorthShore University HealthSystem with the kind support of Center for Advanced Imaging. We would like to acknowledge paper by Blasiak et al. (2011) on similar research topic, which was published at nearly the same time when this contribution was under reviewing process.

References

  1. Aslam M, Schutz EA, Sun T, Meade T, Dravid VP (2007) Synthesis of amine-stabilized aqueous colloidal iron oxide nanoparticles. Cryst Growth Des 7:471–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blasiak B, Zhang Z, Zhang T, Foniok T, Sutherland GR, Veres T, Tomnek B (2011) The effect of coating of Fe3O4/silica core/shell nanoparticles on T-2 relaxation time at 9.4 T Eur. Phys. J Appl Phys 55:10401Google Scholar
  3. Carroll JB, Frankamp BL, Srivastava S, Rotello VM (2004) Electrostatic self-assembly of structured gold nanoparticle/polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane (POSS) nanocomposites. J Mater Chem 14:690–694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen F, Bu W, Chen Y, Fan Y, He Q, Zhu M, Liu X, Zhou L, Zhang S, Peng W, Shi A (2009) Sub-50-nm monosized superparamagnetic Fe3O4@SiO2 T 2-weighted MRI contrast agent: highly reproducible synthesis of uniform single-loaded core–shell nanostructures. J Chem Asian J 4:1809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Duan H, Kuang M, Wang X, Wang YA, Mao H, Nie S (2008) Reexamining the effects of particle size and surface chemistry on the magnetic properties of iron oxide nanocrystals: new insights into spin disorder and proton relaxivity. J Phys Chem C 112:8127–8131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Finni KS, Bartlett JR, Barbe′ CJA, Kong L (2007) Formation of silica nanoparticles in microemulsions. Langmuir 23:3017–3024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Frankamp BL, Fischer NO, Hong R, Srivastava S, Rotello VM (2006) Surface modification using cubic silsesquioxane ligands facile synthesis of water-soluble metal oxide nanoparticles. Chem Mater 18:956–959CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gillis P, Moiny F, Brooks RA (2002) On T 2-shortening by strongly magnetized spheres: a partial refocusing model. Magn Reson Med 47:257–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hu F, MacRenaris KW, Waters EA, Liang T, Schultz-Sikma EA, Eckermann AL, Meade TJ (2009) Ultrasmall, water-soluble magnetite nanoparticles with high relaxivity for magnetic resonance imaging. J Phys Chem C 113:20855–20860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hui C, Shen C, Yang T, Bao L, Tian J, Ding H, Li C, Gao HJ (2008) Large-scale Fe 3O 4 nanoparticles soluble in water synthesized by a facile method. J Phys Chem C 112:11336–11339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jang J, Nah H, Lee JH, Moon SH, Kim MG, Cheon J (2009) Critical enhancements of MRI contrast and hyperthermic effects by Dopant-controlled magnetic nanoparticles. Angew Chem Int Ed 48:1234–1238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jordan A, Scholz R, Wust P, Fahling H, Krause J, Wlodarczyk W, Sander B, Vogl TH, Felix R (1997) Effects of magnetic fluid hyperthermia (MFH) on C3H mammary carcinoma in vivo. Int J Hyperth 13:587–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Joshi HM (2013) Multifunctional ferrite nanoparticles for MR imaging applications. J Nanopart Res 15:1235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Joshi HM, Lin YP, Aslam M, Prasad PV, Schultz EA, Edelman R, Meade T, Dravid VP (2009) Effects of shape and size of cobalt ferrite nanostructures on their MRI contrast and thermal activation. J Phys Chem C 113:17761–17767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jun YW, Huh YM, Choi JS, Lee JH, Song HT, Kim S, Yoon S, Kim KS, Shin JS, Suh JS, Cheon J (2005) Nanoscale size effect of magnetic nanocrystals and their utilization for cancer diagnosis via magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Chem Soc 127:5732–5733CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. LaConte LEW, Nitin N, Zurkiya O, Caruntu D, O’Connor CJ, Hu X, Bao G (2007) Coating thickness of magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles affects R2 relaxivity. J Mag Res Imag 26:1634–1641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Laurent S, Forge D, Port M, Roch A, Robic C, Elst LV, Muller RN (2008) Magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: synthesis, stabilization, vectorization, physicochemical characterizations, and biological applications. Chem Rev 108:2064–2110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lee AH, Huh YM, Jun YW, Seo JW, Jang JT, Song HT, Kim S, Cho EJ, Yoon HG, Suh JS, Cheon J (2007) Artificially engineered magnetic nanoparticles for ultra-sensitive molecular imaging. Nat Med 13:95–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Molday RS, Mackenzie D (1982) Immunospecific ferromagnetic iron-dextran reagents for the labeling and magnetic separation of cells. J Immun Meth 52:353–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Park J, An K, Hwang Y, Park JG, Noh HJ, Kim JY, Park JH, Hwang NM, Hyeon T (2004) Ultra-large-scale syntheses of monodisperse nanocrystals. Nat Mater 3:891–895CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pinho SLC, Pereira GA, Voisin P, Kassem J, Bouchaud V, Etienne L, Peters JA, Carlos L, Mornet S, Geraldes CFGC, Rocha J, Delville MH (2010) Fine tuning of the relaxometry of γ-Fe2O3@SiO2 nanoparticles by tweaking the silica coating thickness. ACS Nano 9:5339–5349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Prasad NK, Rathinasamy K, Panda D, Bahadur D (2007) Mechanism of cell death induced by magnetic hyperthermia with nanoparticles of γ-MnxFe2−xO3 synthesized by a single step process. J Mater Chem 17:5042–5051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rosi NL, Mirkin CA (2005) Nanostructures in biodiagnostics. Chem Rev 105:1547–1562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Schmidt AM (2007) Thermoresponsive magnetic colloids. Colloid Poly Sci 285:953–966CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Schultz-sikma EA, Joshi HM, Ma Q, Macrenaris KW, Eckerman AL, Dravid VP, Meade TJ (2011) Probing the chemical stability of mixed ferrites: implications for magnetic resonance contrast agent design. Chem Mater 23:2657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sun C, Lee JSH, Zhang M (2008) Magnetic nanoparticles in MR imaging and drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 60:1252–1265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ulman A (1996) Formation and structure of self-assembled monolayers. Chem Rev 96:1533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Vogt C, Toprak MS, Muhammed M, Laurent S, Bridot JL, Muller RN (2010) High quality and tuneable silica shell–magnetic core nanoparticles. J Nanopart Res 12:1137–1147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Zhang M, Cushing BL, O’Connor CJ (2008) Synthesis and characterization of monodisperse ultra-thin silica-coated magnetic nanoparticles. Nanotechnology 19:085601CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hrushikesh M. Joshi
    • 1
    • 5
    Email author
  • Mrinmoy De
    • 1
  • Felix Richter
    • 1
  • Jiaqing He
    • 3
  • P. V. Prasad
    • 2
  • Vinayak P. Dravid
    • 1
    • 4
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Materials Science and EngineeringNorthwestern UniversityEvanstonUSA
  2. 2.Department of RadiologyNorthShore University HealthSystemEvanstonUSA
  3. 3.Department of ChemistryNorthwestern UniversityEvanstonUSA
  4. 4.International Institute for NanotechnologyNorthwestern UniversityEvanstonUSA
  5. 5.R&D CentreHindustan Polyamides and Fibres LimitedNavi MumbaiIndia

Personalised recommendations