Journal of Nanoparticle Research

, Volume 12, Issue 2, pp 501–512 | Cite as

Size response of an SMPS–APS system to commercial multi-walled carbon nanotubes

Research Paper


Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) are representative-engineered nanomaterials with unique properties. The safe production of CNTs urgently requires reliable tools to assess inhalation exposure. In this study, on-line aerosol instruments were employed to detect the release of multi-walled CNTs (MWCNTs) in workplace environments. The size responses of aerosol instruments consisting of both a scanning mobility particle sizer (SMPS) and an aerodynamic particle sizer (APS) were examined using five types of commercial MWCNTs. A MWCNT solution and powder were aerosolized using atomizing and shaking methods, respectively. Regardless of the phase and purity, the aerosolized MWCNTs showed consistent size distributions with both SMPS and APS. The SMPS and APS measurements revealed a dominant broad peak at approximately 200–400 nm and a distinct narrow peak at approximately 2 μm, respectively. Comparing with field application of the two aerosol instruments, the APS response could be a fingerprint of the MWCNTs in a real workplace environment. A modification of the atomizing method is recommended for the long-term inhalation toxicity studies.


Aerosol Atomizing EHS Inhalation exposure Multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) Occupational health Shaking Size response 


  1. Aufderheide M, Mohr U (2004) A modified CULTEX® system for the direct exposure of bacteria to inhalable substances. Exp Toxicol Pathol 55(6):451–454CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bae GN, Lee SB, Park SM (2007) Vehicle-related fine particulate air pollution in Seoul, Korea. Asian J Atmos Environ 1(1):1–8Google Scholar
  3. Baron PA, Deye GJ, Chen BT, Schwegler-Berry DE, Shvedova AA, Castranova V (2008) Aerosolization of single-walled carbon nanotubes for an inhalation study. Inhal Toxicol 20(8):751–760CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen DR, Pui DYH (1997) Numerical modeling of the performance of differential mobility analyzers for nanometer aerosol measurements. J Aerosol Sci 28(6):985–1004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen DR, Pui DYH, Hummes D, Fissan H, Quant FR, Sem GJ (1998) Design and evaluation of a nanometer aerosol differential mobility analyzer (Nano-DMA). J Aerosol Sci 29(5/6):497–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Davoren M, Herzog E, Casey A, Cottineau B, Chambers G, Byrne HJ, Lyng FM (2007) In vitro toxicity evaluation of single walled carbon nanotubes on human A549 lung cells. Toxicol In Vitro 21:438–448CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Donaldson K, Aitken R, Tran L, Stone V, Duffin R, Forrest G, Alexander A (2006) Carbon nanotubes: a review of their properties in relation to pulmonary toxicology and workplace safety. Toxicol Sci 92:5–22CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Giechaskiel B, Ntziachristos L, Samaras Z, Scheer V, Casati R, Vogt R (2005) Formation potential of vehicle exhaust nucleation mode particles on-road and in the laboratory. Atmos Environ 39:3191–3198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Han JH, Lee EJ, Lee JH, So KP, Lee YH, Bae GN, Lee S-B, Ji JH, Cho MH, Yu IJ (2008) Monitoring multiwalled carbon nanotube exposure in carbon nanotube research facility. Inhal Toxicol 20:741–749CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Heitbrink WA, Evans DE, Ku BK, Maynard AD, Slavin TJ, Peters TM (2009) Relationships among particle number, surface area, and respirable mass concentrations in automotive engine manufacturing. J Occup Environ Hyg 6:19–31CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Ji JH, Jung JH, Yu IJ, Kim SS (2007a) Long-term stability characteristics of metal nanoparticles generator using small ceramic heater for inhalation toxicity studies. Inhal Toxicol 19:745–751CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Ji JH, Jung JH, Kim SS, Yoon JU, Park JD, Choi BS, Chung YH, Kwon IH, Jeong J, Han BS, Shin JH, Sung JH, Song KS, Yu IJ (2007b) Twenty-eight-day inhalation toxicity study of silver nanoparticles in Sprague-Dawley rats. Inhal Toxicol 19:857–871CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Kim SH, Zachariah MR (2005) In-flight size classification of carbon nanotubes by gas phase electrophoresis. Nanotechnology 16:2149–2152CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  14. Kim SH, Zachariah MR (2006) In-flight kinetic measurements of the aerosol growth of carbon nanotubes by electrical mobility classification. J Phys Chem B 110:4555–4562CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Kittelson DB (1998) Engines and nanoparticles: a review. J Aerosol Sci 29:575–588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ku BK, Maynard AD (2005) Comparing aerosol surface-area measurements of monodisperse ultrafine silver agglomerates by mobility analysis, transmission electron microscopy and diffusion charging. J Aerosol Sci 36:1108–1124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ku BK, Emery MS, Maynard AD, Stolzenburg MR, McMurry PH (2006) In situ structure characterization of airborne carbon nanofibres by a tandem mobility-mass analysis. Nanotechnology 17:3613–3621CrossRefPubMedADSGoogle Scholar
  18. Ku BK, Maynard AD, Baron PA, Deye GJ (2007) Observation and measurement of anomalous responses in a differential mobility analyzer caused by ultrafine fibrous carbon aerosols. J Electrostat 65:542–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lamorena RB, Jung SG, Bae GN, Lee W (2007) The formation of ultra-fine particles during ozone-initiated oxidations with terpenes emitted from natural paint. J Hazard Mater 141:245–251CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Long CM, Suh HH, Koutrakis P (2000) Characterization of indoor particle sources using continuous mass and size monitors. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 50:1236–1250PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Maynard AD, Baron PA, Foley M, Shvedova AA, Kisin ER, Castranova V (2004) Exposure to carbon nanotube material: aerosol release during the handling of unrefined single walled carbon nanotube material. J Toxicol Environ Health A 67:87–107CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Maynard AD, Aitken RJ, Butz T, Colvin V, Donaldson K, Oberdorster G, Philbert MA, Ryan J, Seaton A, Stone V, Tinkle SS, Tran L, Walker NJ, Warheit DB (2006) Safe handling of nanotechnology. Nature 444:267–269CrossRefPubMedADSGoogle Scholar
  23. Maynard AD, Ku BK, Emery M, Stolzenburg M, McMurry PH (2007) Measuring particle size-dependent physiochemical structure in airborne single walled carbon nanotube agglomerates. J Nanopart Res 9:85–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mülhopt S, Paur H-R, Diabaté S, Krug HF (2007) In vitro testing of inhalable fly ash at the air–liquid interface. Advanced environmental monitoring. Springer, Netherlands, pp 402–414Google Scholar
  25. Muller J, Huaux F, Lison D (2006) Respiratory toxicity of carbon nanotubes: how worried should we be? Carbon 44:1048–1056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Poland CA, Duffin R, Kinloch I, Maynard A, Wallace WAH, Seaton A, Stone V, Brown S, MacNee W, Donaldson K (2008) Carbon nanotubes introduced into the abdominal cavity of mice show asbestos-like pathogenicity in a pilot study. Nat Nanotechnol. doi:10.1038/nnano.2008.111
  27. Rao S, Huang L, Setyawan W, Hong S (2003) Nanotube electronics: large-scale assembly of carbon nanotubes. Nature 425:36–37CrossRefPubMedADSGoogle Scholar
  28. Shin WG, Pui DYH, Fissan H, Neumann S, Trampe A (2007) Calibration and numerical simulation of nanoparticle surface area monitor (TSI Model 3550 NSAM). J Nanopart Res 9:61–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Shvedova AA, Kisin E, Murray AR, Johnson VJ, Gorerlik O, Arepalli S, Hubbs F, Mercer RR, Keohavong P, Sussman N, Jin J, Yin J, Stone S, Chen BT, Deye G, Maynard AD, Castranova V, Baron PA, Kagan VE (2008) Inhalation versus aspiration of single-walled carbon nanotubes in C57BL/6 mice: inflammation, fibrosis, oxidative stress, and mutagenesis. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 295(4):L552–L565CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Sinnott SB, Andrews R (2001) Carbon nanotubes: synthesis, properties, and applications. Crit Rev Solid State Mater Sci 26:145–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Watson JG, Chow JC, Park K, Lowenthal DH (2006) Nanoparticle and ultrafine particle events at the Fresno Supersite. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 56:417–430PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Zhao Y, Xing G, Chai Z (2008) Nanotechnology: are carbon nanotubes safe? Nat Nanotechnol 3:191–192CrossRefPubMedADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Environmental Technology ResearchKorea Institute of Science and TechnologySeoulKorea

Personalised recommendations