Synthesis, characterization, and ion-exchange properties of colloidal zeolite nanocrystals

Research Paper

Abstract

Here, we present physical–chemical properties of Linde type A (LTA) zeolite crystals synthesized via conventional hydrothermal and microwave heating methods. Both heating methods produced LTA crystals that were sub-micron in size, highly negatively charged, super-hydrophilic, and stable when dispersed in water. However, microwave heating produced relatively narrow crystal size distributions, required much shorter heating times, and did not significantly change composition, crystallinity, or surface chemistry. Moreover, microwave heating allowed systematic variation of crystal size by varying heating temperature and time during the crystallization reaction, thus producing a continuous gradient of crystal sizes ranging from about 90 to 300 nm. In ion-exchange studies, colloidal zeolites exhibited excellent sorption kinetics and capacity for divalent metal ions, suggesting their potential for use in water softening, scale inhibition, and scavenging of toxic metal ions from water.

Keywords

Nanoparticle Zeolite Microwave Hydrothermal synthesis Ion exchange 

References

  1. Apiratikul R, Pavasant P (2008) Sorption of Cu2+, Cd2+, and Pb2+ using modified zeolite from coal fly ash. Chem Eng J 144:245–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Auerbach SM, Carrado KA et al (2003) Handbook of zeolite science and technology. CRC, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Brant JA, Childress AE (2002) Assessing short-range membrane-colloid interaction using surface energetics. J Membr Sci 203:257–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Breck DW (1974) Zeolite molecular sieves: structure, chemistry, and use. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Carter MR (1993) Soil sampling and methods of analysis. Lewis Publishers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Cundy CS, Cox PA (2003) The hydrothermal synthesis of zeolites: history and development from the earliest days to the present time. Chem Rev 103:663–701PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Davis ME (2002) Ordered porous materials for emerging applications. Nature 417:813–821PubMedCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  8. El-Kamash AM, Zaki AA et al (2005) Modeling batch kinetics and thermodynamics of zinc and cadmium ions removal from waste solutions using synthetic zeolite A. J Hazard Mater 127:211–220PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gregor JE, Fenton E et al (1996) Interactions of calcium and aluminium ions with alginate. Water Res 30:1319–1324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hui KS, Chao CYH et al (2005) Removal of mixed heavy metal ions in wastewater by zeolite 4A and residual products from recycled coal fly ash. J Hazard Mater 127:89–101PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jeong BH, Hoek EMV et al (2007) Interfacial polymerization of thin film nanocomposites: a new concept for reverse osmosis membranes. J Membr Sci 294:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kim S, Hoek MVE (2007) Interactions controlling biopolymer fouling of reverse osmosis membrane. Desalination 202:333–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kuanchertchoo N, Kulprathipanja S et al (2006) Preparation of uniform and nano-sized NaA zeolite using silatrane and alumatrane precursors. Appl Organomet Chem 20:775–783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Larlus O, Mintova S et al (2006) Environmental syntheses of nanosized zeolites with high yield and monomodal particle size distribution. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 96:405–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Larsen SC (2007) Nanocrystalline zeolites and zeolite structures: synthesis, characterization, and applications. J Phys Chem C 111:18464–18474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lind ML, Jeong B-H et al (2008) Effect of mobile cation on zeolite-polyamide thin film nanocomposite membrane. J Mater Res 24:1624–1631CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  17. McDonnell AMP, Beving D et al (2005) Hydrophilic and antimicrobial zeolite coatings for gravity-independent water separation. Adv Funct Mater 15:336–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Tatlier M, Baris K et al (2007) Microwave vs. conventional synthesis of analcime from clear solutions. J Cryst Growth 306:146–151CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  19. Tompsett GA, Conner WC et al (2006) Microwave synthesis of nanoporous materials. ChemPhysChem 7:296–319PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Tosheva L, Valtchev VP (2005) Nanozeolites: synthesis, crystallization mechanism, and applications. Chem Mater 17:2494–2513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. van Oss CJ (1993) Acid-base interfacial interactions in aqueous-media. Colloids Surf A 78:1–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. van Oss CJ, Giese RF (2005) Influence of the pH of water on its electron-accepticity and donicity. J Adhes 81:237–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wang HT, Wang ZB et al (2000) Colloidal suspensions of template-removed zeolite nanocrystals. Chem Commun 2333–2334Google Scholar
  24. Wang HT, Holmberg BA et al (2002) Homogeneous polymer-zeolite nanocomposite membranes by incorporating dispersible template-removed zeolite nanocrystals. J Mater Chem 12:3640–3643CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anna Jawor
    • 1
    • 2
  • Byeong-Heon Jeong
    • 1
    • 2
  • Eric M. V. Hoek
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Civil & Environmental Engineering DepartmentUniversity of California, Los Angeles (UCLA)Los AngelesUSA
  2. 2.California NanoSystems InstituteUniversity of California, Los AngelesLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations