Journal of Nanoparticle Research

, Volume 11, Issue 6, pp 1393–1403 | Cite as

Morphology of single-wall carbon nanotube aggregates generated by electrospray of aqueous suspensions

Research Paper


Airborne single-wall carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) have a high tendency to agglomerate due to strong interparticle attractive forces. The SWCNT agglomerates generally have complex morphologies with an intricate network of bundles of nanotubes and nanoropes, which limits their usefulness in many applications. It is thus desirable to produce SWCNT aerosol particles that have well-defined, unagglomerated fibrous morphologies. We present a method to generate unagglomerated, fibrous particles of SWCNT aerosols using capillary electrospray of aqueous suspensions. The effects of the operating parameters of capillary electrospray such as strength of buffer solution, capillary diameter, flow rate, and colloidal particle concentration on the size distributions of SWCNT aerosols were investigated. Results showed that electrospray from a suspension of higher nanotube concentration produced a bimodal distribution of SWCNT aerosols. Monodisperse SWCNT aerosols below 100 nm were mostly non-agglomerated single fibers, while polydisperse aerosols larger than 100 nm had two distinct morphologies: a ribbon shape and the long, straight fiber. Possible mechanisms are suggested to explain the formation of the different shapes, which could be used to produce SWCNT aerosols with different morphologies.


Single-wall carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) Electrosprays Water suspensions Straight fiber Aerosols Agglomeration 


  1. Baron PA, Sorensen CM, Brockman JE (2001) Nonspherical particle measurements: shape factors, fractals, and fibers. In: Baron PA, Willeke K (eds) Aerosol measurement: principles, techniques, and applications. Wiley, New York, pp 725–726Google Scholar
  2. Birch ME (2003) Elemental carbon monitoring of diesel exhaust particulate in the workplace. In: NIOSH manual of analytical methods (NMAM 5040), Chap Q, 4th edn. NIOSH, Cincinnati, OH (DHHS publication no. 2003-154)Google Scholar
  3. Chen DR, Pui DYH (1997) Experimental investigation of scaling laws for electrospraying: dielectric constant effect. Aerosol Sci Technol 27:367–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Deitzel JM, Kleinmeyer J, Harris D, Tan NCB (2001) The effect of processing variables on the morphology of electrospun nanofibers and textiles. Polymer 42(1):261–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dole M, Mach LL, Hines RL, Mobley RC, Ferguson LP, Alice MB (1968) Molecular beams of macroions. J Chem Phys 49:2240–2249CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  6. Fernandez de la Mora J, Loscertales IG (1994) The current emitted by highly conducting Taylor cones. J Fluid Mech 260:155–184CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  7. Gamero-Castaño M, Fernandez de la Mora J (2000) Mechanisms of electrospray ionization of singly and multiply charged salt clusters. Anal Chim Acta 406:67–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ganan-Calvo AM, Davila J, Barrero A (1997) Current and droplet size in the electrospraying of liquids. Scaling laws. J Aerosol Sci 28:249–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gorelik O, Nikolaev P, Arepalli S (2000) Purification procedures for single-walled carbon nanotubes, NASA contractor report. NASA, Hanover, MD (NASA/CR-2000-208926)Google Scholar
  10. Kaufman SL (2000) Electrospray diagnostics performed by using sucrose and proteins in the gas-phase electrophoretic mobility molecular analyzer (GEMMA). Anal Chim Acta 406:3–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kim SC, Pui DYH (2005) Delivery of single nanoparticles (NP) to cells using an electrospray system [abstract]. In: 2nd international symposium on nanotechnology, occupational health, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 3–6 October 2005, p 80Google Scholar
  12. Ku BK (2007) Characterization of purified single walled carbon nanotube aerosols generated by electrospraying of suspensions. In: 3rd international symposium on nanotechnology, occupational and environmental health, Taipei, Taiwan, Aug 29–Sep 1 2007, pp 11–12Google Scholar
  13. Ku BK, Maynard AD (2005) Comparing aerosol surface-area measurement of monodisperse ultrafine silver agglomerates using mobility analysis, transmission electron microscopy and diffusion charging. J Aerosol Sci 36:1108–1124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ku BK, Maynard AD (2006) Generation and investigation of airborne silver nanoparticles with specific size and morphology by homogeneous nucleation, coagulation and sintering. J Aerosol Sci 37:452–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ku BK, Fernandez de la Mora J, Saucy DA, Alexander JNIV (2004) Mass distribution measurement of water-insoluble polymers by charge-reduced electrospray mobility analysis. Anal Chem 76(3):814–822PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ku BK, Maynard AD, Baron PA, Deye GJ (2007) Observation and measurement of anomalous responses in a differential mobility analyzer caused by ultrafine fibrous carbon aerosols. J Electrostat 65:542–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lam CW, James JT, McCluskey R, Hunter RL (2004) Pulmonary toxicity of single-wall carbon nanotubes in mice 7 and 90 days after intratracheal instillation. Toxicol Sci 77:126–134PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lam CW, James JT, McCluskey R, Arepalli S, Hunter RL (2006) A review of carbon nanotube toxicity and assessment of potential occupational and environmental health risks. Crit Rev Toxicol 36:189–217PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lilienfeld P (1985) Rotational electrodynamics of airborne fibers. J Aerosol Sci 16(4):315–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Maynard AD, Baron PA, Foley M, Shvedova AA, Kisin ER, Castranova V (2004) Exposure to carbon nanotube material: aerosol release during the handling of unrefined single walled carbon nanotube material. J Toxicol Environ Health 67(1):87–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Maynard AD, Ku BK, Emery MS, Stolzenburg MR, McMurry PH (2007) Measuring particle size-dependent physicochemical structure in airborne single walled carbon nanotube agglomerates. J Nanopart Res 9:85–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nakaso K, Fujimoto T, Seto T, Shimada M, Okuyama K, Lunden MM (2001) Size distribution change of Titania nano-particle agglomerates generated by gas phase reaction, agglomeration, and sintering. Aerosol Sci Technol 35:929–947CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nakaso K, Shimada M, Okuyama K, Deppert K (2002) Evaluation of the change in the morphology of gold nanoparticles during sintering. J Aerosol Sci 33:1061–1074CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Oberdörster G, Maynard A, Donaldson K, Castranova V, Fitzpatrick J, Ausman K, Carter J, Karn B, Kreyling W, Lai D, Olin S, Monteiro-Riviere N, Warheit D, Yang H (2005) Principles for characterizing the potential human health effects from exposure to nanomaterials: elements of a screening strategy. Part Fibre Toxicol 2:1–110. doi:10.1186/1743-8977-2-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Poland CA, Duffin R, Kinloch I, Maynard A, Wallace WAH, Seaton A, Stone V, Brown S, MacNee W, Donaldson K (2008) Carbon nanotubes introduced into the abdominal cavity of mice show asbestos-like pathogenicity in a pilot study. Nat Nanotechnol (Published online: 20 May 2008). doi:10.1038/nnano.2008.111
  26. Scott CD, Povitsky A, Dateo C, Gokcen T, Willis PA, Smalley RE (2003) Iron catalyst chemistry in modeling a high-pressure carbon monoxide nanotube reactor. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 3:63–73PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Shvedova AA, Kisin ER, Murray AR, Gandelsman VZ, Maynard AD, Baron PA, Castranova V (2003) Exposure to carbon nanotube material: assessment of the biological effects of nanotube materials using human keratinocyte cells. J Toxicol Environ Health 66(20):1909–1926CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Shvedova AA, Kisin ER, Mercer R, Murray AR, Johnson VJ, Potapovich AI, Tyurina YY, Gorelik O, Arepalli S, Schwegler-Berry D, Hubbs AF, Antonini J, Evans DE, Ku BK, Ramsey D, Maynard A, Kagan VE, Castranova V, Baron P (2005) Unusual inflammatory and fibrogenic pulmonary responses to single-walled carbon nanotubes in mice. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 289:L698–L708PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Stern ST, McNeil SE (2008) Nanotechnology safety concerns revisited. Toxicol Sci 101(1):4–21PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ude S, Fernandez de la Mora J, Thomson BA (2004) Charge-induced unfolding of multiply charged polyethylene glycol ions. J Am Chem Soc 126:12184–12190PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Warheit DB (2006) What is currently known about the health risks related to carbon nanotube exposures? Carbon 44:1064–1069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Warheit DB, Laurence BR, Reed KL, Roach DH, Reynolds GAM, Webb TR (2004) Comparative pulmonary toxicity assessment of single-wall carbon nanotubes in rats. Toxicol Sci 77:117–125PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)CincinnatiUSA

Personalised recommendations