Advertisement

Journal of Nanoparticle Research

, Volume 10, Supplement 1, pp 3–22 | Cite as

A longitudinal analysis of nanotechnology literature: 1976–2004

  • Xin LiEmail author
  • Hsinchun Chen
  • Yan Dang
  • Yiling Lin
  • Catherine A. Larson
  • Mihail C. Roco
Research Paper

Abstract

Nanotechnology research and applications have experienced rapid growth in recent years. We assessed the status of nanotechnology research worldwide by applying bibliographic, content map, and citation network analysis to a data set of about 200,000 nanotechnology papers published in the Thomson Science Citation Index Expanded database (SCI) from 1976 to 2004. This longitudinal study shows a quasi-exponential growth of nanotechnology articles with an average annual growth rate of 20.7% after 1991. The United States had the largest contribution of nanotechnology research and China and Korea had the fastest growth rates. The largest institutional contributions were from the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the Russian Academy of Sciences. The high-impact papers generally described tools, theories, technologies, perspectives, and overviews of nanotechnology. From the top 20 institutions, based on the average number of paper citations in 1976–2004, 17 were in the Unites States, 2 in France and 1 in Germany. Content map analysis identified the evolution of the major topics researched from 1976 to 2004, including investigative tools, physical phenomena, and experiment environments. Both the country citation network and the institution citation network had relatively high clustering, indicating the existence of citation communities in the two networks, and specific patterns in forming citation communities. The United States, Germany, Japan, and China were major citation centers in nanotechnology research with close inter-citation relationships.

Keywords

Bibliographic analysis Citation analysis Information visualization Self-organizing maps Nanoscale science and engineering Nanotechnology papers Research and development (R&D) Technological innovation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the following awards: National Science Foundation (NSF), “Mapping Nanotechnology Development Based on the ISI Literature-Citation Database,” CMMI-0549663 and “Mapping Nanotechnology Development,” CMMI-0533749. The last co-author was supported by the Directorate for Engineering, NSF. The literature data was purchased from Thomson ISI and we thank them for their support.

References

  1. Braun T, Schubert A, Zsindely S (1997) Nanoscience and nanotechnology on the balance. Scientometrics 38(2):321–325. doi: 10.1007/BF02457417 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chen H, Schuffels C, Orwig R (1996) Internet categorization and search: a machine learning approach. J Vis Commun Image R 7(1):88–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen H, Roco MC, Li X, Lin Y (2008) Trends in nanotechnology patents. Nat Nanotechnol 3(3):123–125. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2008.51 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gansner E, North S (2000) An open graph visualization system and its applications to software engineering. Softw-Pract Exp 30(11):1203–1233. doi 10.1002/1097-024X(200009)30:11<1203::AID-SPE338>3.0.CO;2-NGoogle Scholar
  5. Huang Z, Chen H, Yip A, Ng G, Guo F, Chen Z-K et al (2003) Longitudinal patent analysis for Nanoscale Science and Engineering: Country, institution and technology field. J Nanopart Res 5:333–363. doi: 10.1023/A:1025556800994 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Huang Z, Chen H, Chen Z-K, Roco MC (2004) International nanotechnology development in 2003: country, institution, and technology field analysis based on USPTO patent database. J Nanopart Res 6(4):325–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hullmann A (2006) Who is winning the global nanorace? Nat Nanotechnol 1(2):81–83. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2006.110 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Karki MM (1997) Patent citation analysis: a policy analysis tool. World Pat Inf 19:269–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kostoff RN, Murday JS, Lau CGY, Tolles WM (2006a) The seminal literature of nanotechnology research. J Nanopart Res 8(2):193–213. doi: 10.1007/s11051-005-9034-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kostoff RN, Stump JA, Johnson D, Murday JS, Lau CGY, Tolles WM (2006b) The structure and infrastructure of the global nanotechnology literature. J Nanopart Res 8(3–4):301–321. doi: 10.1007/s11051-005-9035-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Li X, Chen H, Huang Z, Roco MC (2007a) Patent citation network in nanotechnology (1976–2004). J Nanopart Res 9(3):337–352. doi: 10.1007/s11051-006-9194-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Li X, Lin Y, Chen H, Roco MC (2007b) Worldwide nanotechnology development: a comparative study of USPTO, EPO, and JPO patents (1976–2004). J Nanopart Res 9(6):977–1002. doi: 10.1007/s11051-007-9273-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Meyer MS (2001) Patent citation analysis in a novel field of technology: An exploration of nano-science and nano-technology. Scientometrics 51(1):163–183. doi: 10.1023/A:1010572914033 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Meyer M, Persson O (1998) Nanotechnology - Interdisciplinarity, patterns of collaboration and differences in application. Scientometrics 42(2):195–205. doi: 10.1007/BF02458355 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ong T-H, Chen H, Sung W-K, Zhu B (2005) NewsMap: a knowledge map for online news. Decis Support Syst 39:583–597. doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2004.03.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Oppenheim C (2000) Do patent citations count? In: Cromin B, Atkins HB (eds) The Web of knowledge. Information Today, Inc., Medford, pp 405–432Google Scholar
  17. Porter AL, Cunningham S (1995) Whither Nanotechnology? A Bibliometric Study. Foresight Update 21:4Google Scholar
  18. Roco MC (2005) International perspective on government nanotechnology funding in 2005. J Nanopart Res 7:707–712. doi: 10.1007/s11051-005-3141-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Roco MC, Williams RS, Alivisatos P (2000) Nanotechnology research directions. Springer (former Kluwer Academic Publishers), DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  20. Schummer J (2004) Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, and patterns of research collaboration in nanoscience and nanotechnology. Scientometrics 59(3):425–465. doi: 10.1023/B:SCIE.0000018542.71314.38 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Tolle K, Chen H (2000) Comparing noun phrasing techniques for use with medical digital library tools. J Am Soc Inf Sci 51(4):518–522. doi 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(2000)51:4<352::AID-ASI5>3.0.CO;2-8Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xin Li
    • 1
    Email author
  • Hsinchun Chen
    • 1
  • Yan Dang
    • 1
  • Yiling Lin
    • 1
  • Catherine A. Larson
    • 1
  • Mihail C. Roco
    • 2
  1. 1.Artificial Intelligence Lab, Department of Management Information Systems, Eller College of ManagementThe University of ArizonaTucsonUSA
  2. 2.National Science FoundationArlingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations