Skip to main content

Possibilities for global governance of converging technologies

Journal of Nanoparticle Research volume 10, pages 11–29 (2008)Cite this article

Abstract

The convergence of nanotechnology, modern biology, the digital revolution and cognitive sciences will bring about tremendous improvements in transformative tools, generate new products and services, enable opportunities to meet and enhance human potential and social achievements, and in time reshape societal relationships. This paper focuses on the progress made in governance of such converging, emerging technologies and suggests possibilities for a global approach. Specifically, this paper suggests creating a multidisciplinary forum or a consultative coordinating group with members from various countries to address globally governance of converging, emerging technologies. The proposed framework for governance of converging technologies calls for four key functions: supporting the transformative impact of the new technologies; advancing responsible development that includes health, safety and ethical concerns; encouraging national and global partnerships; and establishing commitments to long-term planning and investments centered on human development. Principles of good governance guiding these functions include participation of all those who are forging or affected by the new technologies, transparency of governance strategies, responsibility of each participating stakeholder, and effective strategic planning. Introduction and management of converging technologies must be done with respect for immediate concerns, such as privacy, access to medical advancements, and potential human health effects. At the same time, introduction and management should also be done with respect for longer-term concerns, such as preserving human integrity, dignity and welfare. The suggested governance functions apply to four levels of governance: (a) adapting existing regulations and organizations; (b) establishing new programs, regulations and organizations specifically to handle converging technologies; (c) building capacity for addressing these issues into national policies and institutions; and (d) making international agreements and partnerships. Several possibilities for improving the governance of converging technologies in the global self-regulating ecosystem are recommended: using open-source and incentive-based models, establishing corresponding science and engineering platforms, empowering the stakeholders and promoting partnerships among them, implementing long-term planning that includes international perspectives, and institute voluntary and science-based measures for risk management.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Notes

  1. 1.

    www.convergingtechnologies.org

  2. 2.

    http://www.nsf.gov/news/news_summ.jsp?cntn_id=100454&org=NSF&from=news

References

  1. ABA (American Bar Association) (2006a) CERCLA nanotechnology issues. Chicago, US

  2. ABA (2006b) Nanotechnology briefing paper: clean water act. Chicago, US

  3. ABA (2006c) Innovative regulatory approaches. Chicago, US

  4. Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) (2002) Nanotechnology: the technology of the 21st century (2 vols), Bangkok, Thailand (ISBN 974-229-337-6)

  5. APEC Nanoforum (2006) Website: http://www.cms.itri.org.tw/eng/APECNanoForum/

  6. Bainbridge WS, Roco MC (eds) (2006) Managing nano-bio-info-cogno innovations: converging technologies in society. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  7. CBAN (Collaborative Board for Advancing Nanotechnology between NNI and industry) (2006) Joint NNI-ChI CBAN and SRC CWG5 nanotechnology EHS research needs recommendations. Washington, DC, January 20, 2006

  8. ETC Group (2005) The potential impact of nanoscale technologies on commodity markets: implications for commodity dependent developing counties. ETC Group, Ottawa, Canada, online at http://www.etcgroup.org/upload/publication/45/01/southcentre.commodities.pdf

  9. Gordijn B (2003) Nanoethics: from utopian dreams and apocalyptic nightmares towards a more balanced view. UNESCO, Paris, France, online at http://portal.unesco.org/shs/en/ev.php-URL_ID=6603&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html

  10. Hammond J, Keeney R, Raiffa H (1999) Smart choices: a practical guide to making better decisions. Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hollins O (2007) Environmentally beneficial nanotechnologies: barriers and opportunities. Report for the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, DEFR01 098 Report, London, UK

  12. IC Insights (2006) Optoelectronics sales will barely top discrete semiconductors in 2006, press release October 26, online at http://www.icinsights.com/news/releases/press20061026.html

  13. Illinois Institute of Technology (IIT) node, Nanotechnology in Society Network (2007) NanoEthicsBank (http://hum.iit.edu/NanoEthicsBank/intro/info.html), part of NanoConnection in Society (http://nanoconnection.net/about.php), IIT Chicago, Illinois, and University of California at Los Angeles

  14. International Risk Governance Council (IRGC) (2006a) White paper on risk governance of nanotechnology. IRGC, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  15. International Risk Governance Council (IRGC) (2006b) Surveys on risk governance of nanotechnology. IRGC, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  16. ITRS (Information Technology Research for Semiconductors) (2004) Nanoelectonics roadmap

  17. Kearnes M, Macnaghten P, Wilsdon J (2006) Governing at the nanoscale: people, policies and emerging technologies. DEMOS, London, 87 pp

  18. Kushf G (2004) Systems theory and the ethics of human enhancement. In: Roco MC, Montemagno C (eds) The coevolution of human potential and converging technologies. New York Academy of Sciences, New York, pp 124–149

    Google Scholar 

  19. Linkov I, Satterstrom FK, Steevens J, Ferguson E, Pleus RC (2007) Multi-criteria decision analysis and environmental risk assessment for nanomaterials. J Nanopart Res 9(4):543–554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lyall C, Tait J (2005) Shifting policy debates and the implications for governance. In: Lyall C, Tait J. (eds) New modes of governance, developing an integrated approach to science, technology, risk and the environment. Ashgate Publishing, Aldershot, England, pp 1–17

    Google Scholar 

  21. Meridian Institute (2004) International dialogue on responsible research and development of nanotechnology. Meridian Institute, Washington, DC., online at http://meridian-nano.org/Final_Report_Responsible_Nanotech_RD_040812.pdf

  22. Meridian Institute (2006) Project on nanotechnology for water filtration and purification. Meridian Institute, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  23. National Academies (2007) Proc. “Emerging frameworks and strategies for enabling and controlling knowledge”, Workshop, January 29–30, National Academies, Washington, D.C., www.si.umich.edu/cyber-infrastructure/program.htm

  24. NNI (2006) Environmental, health, and safety research needs for engineered nanoscale materials. National Nanotechnology Coordination Office, Arlington, Virginia

    Google Scholar 

  25. OECD (2006) Report of the OECD workshop on the safety of manufactured nanomaterials: building co-operation, co-ordination and communication. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris, France, online at www.oecd.org/env/nanosafety

  26. Pielke RA (2002) Policy, politics and perspective. Nature 416:367–368

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Radnor M, Strauss JD (2003) Commercializing and managing the converging new technologies. Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois

    Google Scholar 

  28. Renn O, Roco MC (2006) Nanotechnology and the need for risk governance. J Nanopart Res 8(2):153–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Roco MC (2004) Nanoscale science and engineering: unifying and transforming tools. AIChE J (Feature article) 50(5):890–897

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Roco MC (2005) The emergence and policy implications of converging new technologies integrated from the nanoscale. J Nanopart Res 7(2–3):129–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Roco MC, Bainbridge WS (eds) (2001) Societal implications of nanoscience and nanotechnology. Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  32. Roco MC, Bainbridge WS (eds) (2003) Converging technologies for improving human performance. Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  33. Roco MC, Bainbridge WS (eds) (2006) Nanotechnology: societal implications, 2 volumes. Springer, Berlin

  34. Roco MC, Montemagno CD (eds) (2004) The coevolution of human potential and converging technologies. New York Academy of Sciences, New York

    Google Scholar 

  35. Roco MC, Williams S, Alivisatos P (1999) Nanotechnology research directions. Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  36. Spohrer JC, Engelbart DC (2004) Converging technologies: science and business perspectives. In: Roco MC, Montemagno CD (eds) The coevolution of human potential and converging technologies. New York Academy of Sciences, New York, pp 50–82

    Google Scholar 

  37. Szalary A, Gray J (2006) Science in an exponential world. Nature 440:413–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. THECiS (The Center for Innovation Studies) (2007) Prospective Applications of Converging Technologies, Government of Canada Ottawa, Canada

  39. UNESCO (2006a) The ethics and politics of nanotechnology. UNESCO, Paris, France, online at http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0014/001459/145951e.pdf

  40. UNESCO (2006b) Global ethics observatory. UNESCO, Paris, France, online at www.unesco.org/shs/ethics/geobs

  41. UNESCO (2006c) Humanity and the biosphere: the next thousand years. UNESCO and “The Foundation for the Future”, Paris, France

  42. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) (2001) Human development report. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  43. Wilston J, Willis R (2004) See-through science: why public engagement needs to move upstream. Demos, London, online at www.demos.co.uk

  44. Winner L (1977) Autonomous technology: technics-out-of-control as a theme in political thought. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  45. World Economic Forum (2006) Global risks 2006. WEF, Geneva, Switzerland, online at www.weforum.org

Download references

Acknowledgements

This paper is an extension of the chapter “Progress in Governance of Converging Technologies Integrated from the Nanoscale” (M. Roco) in Bainbridge and Roco (2006).

Author information

Affiliations

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF), 4201 Wilson Blvd, Arlington, VA, 22230, USA

    Mihail C. Roco

Authors
  1. Mihail C. Roco
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mihail C. Roco.

Additional information

The opinions in this chapter reflect those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of NSF.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Roco, M.C. Possibilities for global governance of converging technologies. J Nanopart Res 10, 11–29 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-007-9269-8

Download citation

Keywords

  • Nanotechnology
  • Biotechnology
  • Information technology
  • Cognition
  • Societal implications
  • EHS
  • ELSI
  • NBIC
  • Education
  • Global approach
  • Open-source organization
  • Risk governance