Skip to main content
Log in

An axial flow cyclone to remove nanoparticles at low pressure conditions

  • Special focus: Nanoparticles and occupational health
  • Published:
Journal of Nanoparticle Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, the axial flow cyclone used in Tsai et al. (2004) was further tested for the collection efficiency of both solid (NaCl) and liquid (OA, oleic acid) nanoparticles. The results showed that the smallest cutoff aerodynamic diameters achieved for OA and NaCl nanoparticles were 21.7 nm (cyclone inlet pressure: 4.3 Torr, flow rate: 0.351 slpm) and 21.2 nm (5.4 Torr, 0.454 slpm), respectively. The collection efficiencies for NaCl and OA particles were close to each other for the aerodynamic diameter ranging from 25 to 180 nm indicating there was almost no solid particle bounce in the cyclone. The 3-D numerical simulation was conducted to calculate the flow field in the cyclone and the flow was found to be nearly paraboloid. Numerical simulation of the particle collection efficiency based on the paraboloid flow assumption showed that the collection efficiency was in good agreement with the experimental data with less than 15% of error. A semi-empirical equation for predicting the cutoff aerodynamic diameter at different inlet pressures and flow rates was also obtained. The semi-empirical equation is able to predict the cutoff aerodynamic diameter accurately within 9% of error. From the empirical cutoff aerodynamic diameter, a semi-empirical square root of the cutoff Stokes number, \(\sqrt {St_{50}^\ast}\), was calculated and found to be a constant value of 0.241. This value is useful to the design of the cyclone operating in vacuum to remove nanoparticles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Biswas P., Flagan R.J. (1988) Particle trap impactor. Aerosol Sci. 19: 113–121

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blachman M.W., Lippmann M. (1974) Performance characteristics of the multicyclone aerosol sampler. Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J. 35: 311–326

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boysan F., Ewan B.C.R., Swithenbank J., Ayers W.H. (1983) Experimental and theoretical studies of cyclone aeparator aerodynamics. IChemeE. Symp. Series 69: 305–320

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harwood R., Slack M. (2002) CFD analysis of a cyclone. QNET-CFD Network Newsletter. 1: 25–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinds W.C. (1999) Aerosol Technology. Wiley, New York, p126

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoekstra A.J., Derksen J.J., Van Den Akker H.E.A. (1999) An experimental and numerical study of turbulent swirling flow in gas cyclones. Chem. Eng. Sci. 54: 2055–2065

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu Y.D., Chein H.M., Chen T.M., Tsai C.J. (2005) Axial flow cyclone for segregation and collection of ultrafine particle: Theoretical and experimental study. Environ. Sci. Technol. 39: 1299–1308

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu B.Y.H., Rubow K.L. (1984) A new axial flow cascade cyclone for size characterization of airborne particulate matter. In: Liu B.Y.H., Pui D.Y., Fissan H.J. (eds) Aerosols. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 115–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard A.D. (2000) A simple model of axial flow cyclone performance under laminar flow conditions. J. Aerosol Sci. 31: 151–167

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Patankar S.V. (1980) Numerical Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow. Hemisphere Publishing Co, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt S., Thiele F. (2002) Comparison of numerical methods applied to the flow over wall-mounted cubes. Inter. J. Heat & Fluid Flow. 23: 330–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt S., H.M. Blackburn, M. Rudman & I. Sutalo, 2003. Simulation of turbulent flow in a cyclonic separator. 3rd International conference on CFD in the Minerals and Process Industries CSIRO, Melbourne, Australia, 10–12 December 2003, p. 365–369

  • Tsai C.J., Shiau H.G., Lin K.C., Shih T.S. (1999) Effect of deposited particles and particle charge on the penetration of small sampling cyclones. J. Aerosol Sci. 30: 313–323

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai C.J., Lin T.I. (2000) Particle collection efficiency of different impactor designs. Sep. Sci. Technol. 35: 2639–2650

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai C.J., Cheng Y.H. (1995) Solid particle collection characteristics on impaction surfaces of different designs. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 23: 96–106

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai C.J., Chen D.R., Chein H.M., Chen S.C., Roth J.L., Hsu Y.D., Li W., Biswas P. (2004) Theoretical and experimental study of an axial flow cyclone for fine particle removal in vacuum conditions. J. Aerosol Sci. 35: 1105–1118

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan N.P. (1988) Construction and testing of an axial flow cyclone pre-separator. J. Aerosol Sci. 19: 295–305

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss Z., Martinec P., Vitek J. (1987) Vlastnosti Dulnibo Prachu A Zaklady Protiprasne Techniky. SNTL, Prague

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiang R.B. & K.W. Lee, 2004. The flow pattern in cyclones with different cone dimensions and its effect on separation efficiency. Abstract, EAC 2004, Budapest, Hungary, Sep. 6–10, p. 289–290

  • Zhu Y., Lee K.W. (1999) Experimental study on small cyclones operating at high flowrates. J. Aerosol Sci. 30: 1303–1315

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

Authors would like to thank for the financial support of this project by Taiwan National Science Council (NSC 94-2211-E-009-001).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chuen-Jinn Tsai.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, SC., Tsai, CJ. An axial flow cyclone to remove nanoparticles at low pressure conditions. J Nanopart Res 9, 71–83 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-006-9152-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-006-9152-z

Keywords

Navigation