A scope freezing effect with negated quantifier phrases
I document a scope freezing effect found with negated quantifier phrases (distinct from the scope freezing effect discussed in Collins (Nat Lang Semant 24: 291–303, 2016a)). In a sentence with a negated quantifier phrase of the form [NEG DP1], no quantifier phrase DP2 can take scope between NEG and DP1. I show how this scope freezing effect can be explained in terms of the analysis of negated quantifier phrases given in Collins and Postal (Classical NEG raising, MIT Press, Cambridge, 2014) and Collins (2016a).
KeywordsScope freezing Negation Many Split scope
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Collins, Chris. 2016b. *NEG NEG. Ms., NYU.Google Scholar
- Collins, Chris. 2017. The distribution of negated quantifier phrases in English. Ms., NYU.Google Scholar
- Hackl, Martin. 2000. Comparative quantifiers. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
- Heim, Irene. 2000. Degree operators and scope. In Proceedings of SALT 10, ed. Brendan Jackson and Tanya Matthews, 40–64. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.Google Scholar
- Lasnik, Howard. 1972. Analyses of negation in English. PhD dissertation, MIT. Distributed by Indiana University Linguistics Club, 1976.Google Scholar
- May, Robert. 1977. Grammar of quantification. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
- Partee, Barbara and Mats Rooth. 1983. Generalized conjunction and type ambiguity. In Meaning, use and interpretation of language, ed. Rainer Bäuerle et al., 361–383. Berlin: de Gruyter. (Republished in Paul Portner and Barbara H. Partee (eds.), Formal semantics: the essential readings. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2002).Google Scholar
- Penka, Doris. 2011. Negative indefinites. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar