This paper proposes an analysis of the semantics of even that is consistent with the assumptions about the syntax and semantics of negation in Collins and Postal (Classical NEG raising, MIT Press, Cambridge, 2014). First, I review the distribution of negation, showing how negation may modify quantificational expressions where it gives rise to scope freezing effects. Second, I discuss the fact that even-phrases can be modified by negation, as in Not even John is there. On the basis of this fact, I argue that even is a quantifier. Lastly, I show that my data provides new empirical support for the assumption that there are two kinds of even, depending on the role played by focus in the scalar presupposition.
KeywordsEven Negation Negative polarity items Scalar presupposition Existential presupposition Scope freezing NEG raising
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Haegeman, Liliane. 2000. Negative preposing, negative inversion, and the split CP. In Negation and polarity, ed. L. Horn and Y. Kato, 21–61. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Hankamer, Jorge, and Ivan Sag. 1976. Deep and surface anaphora. Linguistic Inquiry 7(3): 391–426.Google Scholar
- Heim, Irene, and Angelika Kratzer. 1998. Semantics in generative grammar. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Horn, Laurence R. 1969. A presuppositional analysis of only and even. In Papers from the 5 th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society 5, 98–107. Chicago: CLS.Google Scholar
- Karttunen, Lauri, and Stanley Peters. 1979. Conventional implicature. In Syntax and Semantics 11: Presuppositions, ed. C. Oh and D. Dinneen, 1–56. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Lobeck, Anne. 1995. Ellipsis: Functional heads, licensing and identification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- McCawley, James D. 1991. Contrastive negation and metalinguistic negation. In Papers from the 27 th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Part Two: The Parasession on Negation, 189–206. Chicago: CLS.Google Scholar
- Neale, Stephen. 1990. Descriptions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Partee, Barbara. 2004. Noun phrase interpretation and type-shifting principles. In Compositionality in Formal Semantics, 203–230. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Rooth, Mats E. 1985. Association with focus. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.Google Scholar
- Rullman, Hotze. 2007. What does even even mean? Handout of a talk at the Linguistic Colloquium, University of Calgary, December 7.Google Scholar
- Schwarz, Bernhard. 2000. Notes on “even”. Ms., University of Stuttgart.Google Scholar