Natural Language Semantics

, Volume 23, Issue 4, pp 271–305

Scalar implicatures of embedded disjunction


DOI: 10.1007/s11050-015-9116-x

Cite this article as:
Crnič, L., Chemla, E. & Fox, D. Nat Lang Semantics (2015) 23: 271. doi:10.1007/s11050-015-9116-x


Sentences with disjunction in the scope of a universal quantifier, Every A is P or Q, tend to give rise to distributive inferences that each of the disjuncts holds of at least one individual in the domain of the quantifier, Some A is P & Some A is Q. These inferences are standardly derived as an entailment of the meaning of the sentence together with the scalar implicature that it is not the case that either disjunct holds of every individual in the domain of the quantifier, \({\neg}\)Every A is P &\({\neg}\)Every A is Q (plain negated inferences). As we show, this derivation faces a challenge in that distributive inferences may obtain in the absence of plain negated inferences. We address this challenge by showing that on particular assumptions about alternatives, a derivation of distributive inferences as scalar implicatures can be maintained without in fact necessitating plain negated inferences. These assumptions accord naturally with the grammatical approach to scalar implicatures. We also present experimental data that suggest that plain negated inferences are not only unnecessary for deriving distributive inferences, but might in fact be unavailable.


Scalar implicatures Disjunction Embedded exhaustification 

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Hebrew University of JerusalemJerusalemIsrael
  2. 2.Ecole Normale SupérieureParisFrance
  3. 3.Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations