It is commonly argued that natural language has the expressive power of quantifying over intensional entities, such as times, worlds, or situations. A standard way of modelling this assumes that there are unpronounced but syntactically represented variables of the corresponding type. Not all that much as has been said, however, about the exact syntactic location of these variables. Meanwhile, recent work has highlighted a number of problems that arise because the interpretive options for situation pronouns seem to be subject to various restrictions. This paper is primarily concerned with situation pronouns inside of determiner phrases, arguing that they are introduced as arguments of (certain) determiners. Verbal predicates, on the other hand, are assumed to not combine with a situation pronoun. The various restrictions on their interpretation are shown to fall out from the semantic system that is developed based on that view. Further support for such an account comes from situation semantic analyses of donkey sentences as well as data on the temporal interpretation of nominal predicates. Its ability to account for this full range of data in a unified manner is shown to set it apart from previous proposals. The paper closes with an outlook on further extensions, including an account of quantifier domain restriction based on situation pronouns.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Abusch Dorit. (1994) The scope of indefinites. Natural Language Semantics 2(2): 83–136
Barwise J., Etchemendy J. (1987) The liar. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Barwise J., Perry J. (1983) Situations and attitudes. MIT Press, Cambridge
Bäuerle, Rainer. 1983. Pragmatisch-semantische Aspekte der NP-Interpretation. In Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Sprachtypologie, und Textlinguistik: Festschrift für Peter Hartmann, ed. M. Faust, R. Harweg, W. Lehfeldt, and G. Wienold, 121–131. Tübingen: Narr.
van Benthem J.F.A. K. (1977) Tense logic and standard logic. Logique et Analyse 80: 395–437
Berman, S. 1987. Situation-based semantics for adverbs of quantification. In UMOP 12, ed. J. Blevins and A. Vainikka, 45–68. Amherst: GLSA.
Büring Daniel (2003) On d-trees, beans, and b-accents. Linguistics and Philosophy 26(5): 511–546
Büring Daniel. (2004) Crossover situations. Natural Language Semantics 12(1): 23–62
Büring Daniel. (2005) Binding theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Cooper, Robin. 1978. Variable binding and relative clauses. In Formal semantics and pragmatics for natural language, ed. F. Guenthner and S. J. Schmidt, 131–169. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Cooper, Robin. 1993. Generalized quantifiers and resource situations. In Situation theory and its applications, ed. Peter Aczel, Robin Cooper, Yasushiro Katagiri, John Perry, Kuniaki Mukai, David Israel, and Stanley Peters, 191–212. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Cooper, Robin. 1995. The role of situations in generalized quantifiers. In Handbook of contemporary semantic theory, ed. Shalom Lappin. Malden: Blackwell.
Cresswell M. J. (1990) Entities and indices. Kluwer, Dordrecht
Elbourne Paul. (2005) Situations and individuals. MIT Press, Cambridge
Enç, Mürvet. 1981. Tense without scope: An analysis of nouns as indexicals. PhD thesis, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Enç Mürvet. (1986) Toward a referential analysis of temporal expressions. Linguistics and Philosophy 9: 405–426
Fintel, K. von., and Irene Heim. 2007. Intensional semantics. Lecture Notes, MIT.
Fodor, Janet D. 1970. The linguistic description of opaque contents. PhD thesis, MIT.
Heim Irene. (1990) E-type pronouns and donkey anaphora. Linguistics and Philosophy 13(2): 137–178
Heim Irene, Angelika Kratzer. (1998) Semantics in generative grammar. Blackwell, Malden
Iatridou, S., and I. Sichel. 2008. Negative DPs and scope diminishment: Some basic patterns. In Proceedings of NELS 38, ed. A. Schardl, M. Walkow, and M. Badurrahman, 337–350. University of Massachusetts at Amherst, GLSA.
Iatridou S., Sichel. I. (2011) Negative DPs, A-Movement, and Scope Diminishment. Linguistic Inquiry 42(4): 595–629
Kamp Hans. (1971) Formal properties of ‘now’. Theoria 37: 227–273
Keshet, Ezra. 2008a. Good intensions: Paving two roads to a theory of the de re/de dicto distinction. PhD thesis, MIT.
Keshet, Ezra. 2008b. Only the strong: Restricting situation variables. In Proceedings of SALT 18, ed. T. Friedman and S. Ito, 483–495. Ithaca: Cornell University.
Keshet Ezra. (2010) Situation economy. Natural Language Semantics 18: 385–434
Keshet, Ezra. 2011b. Split intensionality: A new scope theory of de re and de dicto. Linguistics and Philosophy. doi:10.1007/s10988-011-9081-x. http://www.springerlink.com/content/d584131779263716/.
Kratzer Angelika. (1989) An investigation of the lumps of though. Linguistics and Philosophy 12(5): 607–653
Kratzer, Angelika. 2004. Covert quantifier restrictions in natural languages. Talk given at Palazzo Feltrinelli in Gargnano, June 11, 2004.
Kratzer, Angelika. 2007. Situations in natural language semantics. In Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, ed. Edward N. Zalta. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Kusumoto, Kiyomi. 1999. Tense in embedded contexts. PhD thesis, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
Kusumoto Kiyomi. (2005) On the quantification over times in natural language. Natural Language Semantics 13(4): 317–357
Ladusaw W. (1977) Some problems with tense in PTQ. Texas Linguistic Forum 6: 89–102
Landman, Fred (2004) Indefinites and the type of sets. Blackwell, Oxford
Lewis David. (1986) On the plurality of worlds. Blackwell, Oxford
Matthewson Lisa. (2001) Quantification and the nature of crosslinguistic variation. Natural Language Semantics 9(1): 145–189
Milsark, G. 1974. Existential sentences in English. PhD thesis, MIT.
Milsark G. (1977) Towards the explanation of certain peculiarities of existential sentences in English. Linguistic Analysis 3: 1–29
Montague, R. 1974. Formal philosophy. Selected papers by Richard Montague, ed. R. H. Thomason. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Musan, Renate. 1995. On the temporal Interpretation of noun phrases. PhD thesis, MIT.
Ogihara T. (1992) Temporal reference in English and Japanese. Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington
Ogihara T. (1996) Tense, attitudes, and scope. Kluwer, Dordrecht
Percus Orin. (2000) Constraints on some other variables in syntax. Natural Language Semantics 8(3): 173–229
Russell B. (1905) On denoting. Mind 14: 479–493
Schwager, Magdalena. 2010. Speaking of qualities. In Proceedings of SALT 9. Ithaca: CLC Publications.
Schwarz, Florian. 2009. Two types of definites in natural language. PhD thesis, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
Schwarz, Florian. 2011. Situation pronouns and domain restriction. Ms, University of Pennsylvania.
Soames Scott. (1986) Incomplete definite descriptions. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 27: 349–375
Stechow, A. von. 1984. Structured propositions and essential indexicals. In Varieties of formal semantics. Proceedings of the 4th Amsterdam Colloquium, ed. Fred Landman and Frank Feldman, 385–404. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.
Stowell, Tim. 1993. Syntax of tense. Ms., UCLA.
Vlach, Frank. 1973. ‘Now’ and ‘then’: A formal study in the logic of tense anaphora. PhD thesis, UCLA.
About this article
Cite this article
Schwarz, F. Situation pronouns in determiner phrases. Nat Lang Semantics 20, 431–475 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-012-9086-1