Skip to main content
Log in

Abstract

It is commonly argued that natural language has the expressive power of quantifying over intensional entities, such as times, worlds, or situations. A standard way of modelling this assumes that there are unpronounced but syntactically represented variables of the corresponding type. Not all that much as has been said, however, about the exact syntactic location of these variables. Meanwhile, recent work has highlighted a number of problems that arise because the interpretive options for situation pronouns seem to be subject to various restrictions. This paper is primarily concerned with situation pronouns inside of determiner phrases, arguing that they are introduced as arguments of (certain) determiners. Verbal predicates, on the other hand, are assumed to not combine with a situation pronoun. The various restrictions on their interpretation are shown to fall out from the semantic system that is developed based on that view. Further support for such an account comes from situation semantic analyses of donkey sentences as well as data on the temporal interpretation of nominal predicates. Its ability to account for this full range of data in a unified manner is shown to set it apart from previous proposals. The paper closes with an outlook on further extensions, including an account of quantifier domain restriction based on situation pronouns.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abusch Dorit. (1994) The scope of indefinites. Natural Language Semantics 2(2): 83–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barwise J., Etchemendy J. (1987) The liar. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Barwise J., Perry J. (1983) Situations and attitudes. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Bäuerle, Rainer. 1983. Pragmatisch-semantische Aspekte der NP-Interpretation. In Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Sprachtypologie, und Textlinguistik: Festschrift für Peter Hartmann, ed. M. Faust, R. Harweg, W. Lehfeldt, and G. Wienold, 121–131. Tübingen: Narr.

  • van Benthem J.F.A. K. (1977) Tense logic and standard logic. Logique et Analyse 80: 395–437

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman, S. 1987. Situation-based semantics for adverbs of quantification. In UMOP 12, ed. J. Blevins and A. Vainikka, 45–68. Amherst: GLSA.

  • Büring Daniel (2003) On d-trees, beans, and b-accents. Linguistics and Philosophy 26(5): 511–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Büring Daniel. (2004) Crossover situations. Natural Language Semantics 12(1): 23–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Büring Daniel. (2005) Binding theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, Robin. 1978. Variable binding and relative clauses. In Formal semantics and pragmatics for natural language, ed. F. Guenthner and S. J. Schmidt, 131–169. Dordrecht: Reidel.

  • Cooper, Robin. 1993. Generalized quantifiers and resource situations. In Situation theory and its applications, ed. Peter Aczel, Robin Cooper, Yasushiro Katagiri, John Perry, Kuniaki Mukai, David Israel, and Stanley Peters, 191–212. Stanford: CSLI Publications.

  • Cooper, Robin. 1995. The role of situations in generalized quantifiers. In Handbook of contemporary semantic theory, ed. Shalom Lappin. Malden: Blackwell.

  • Cresswell M. J. (1990) Entities and indices. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Elbourne Paul. (2005) Situations and individuals. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Enç, Mürvet. 1981. Tense without scope: An analysis of nouns as indexicals. PhD thesis, University of Wisconsin-Madison.

  • Enç Mürvet. (1986) Toward a referential analysis of temporal expressions. Linguistics and Philosophy 9: 405–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fintel, K. von., and Irene Heim. 2007. Intensional semantics. Lecture Notes, MIT.

  • Fodor, Janet D. 1970. The linguistic description of opaque contents. PhD thesis, MIT.

  • Heim Irene. (1990) E-type pronouns and donkey anaphora. Linguistics and Philosophy 13(2): 137–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heim Irene, Angelika Kratzer. (1998) Semantics in generative grammar. Blackwell, Malden

    Google Scholar 

  • Iatridou, S., and I. Sichel. 2008. Negative DPs and scope diminishment: Some basic patterns. In Proceedings of NELS 38, ed. A. Schardl, M. Walkow, and M. Badurrahman, 337–350. University of Massachusetts at Amherst, GLSA.

  • Iatridou S., Sichel. I. (2011) Negative DPs, A-Movement, and Scope Diminishment. Linguistic Inquiry 42(4): 595–629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamp Hans. (1971) Formal properties of ‘now’. Theoria 37: 227–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keshet, Ezra. 2008a. Good intensions: Paving two roads to a theory of the de re/de dicto distinction. PhD thesis, MIT.

  • Keshet, Ezra. 2008b. Only the strong: Restricting situation variables. In Proceedings of SALT 18, ed. T. Friedman and S. Ito, 483–495. Ithaca: Cornell University.

  • Keshet Ezra. (2010) Situation economy. Natural Language Semantics 18: 385–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keshet, Ezra. 2011a. Possible worlds and wide scope indefinites: A reply to Bäuerle 1983. Linguistic Inquiry 41 (4): 692–701. doi:10.1162/LING_a_00019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/LING_a_00019.

  • Keshet, Ezra. 2011b. Split intensionality: A new scope theory of de re and de dicto. Linguistics and Philosophy. doi:10.1007/s10988-011-9081-x. http://www.springerlink.com/content/d584131779263716/.

  • Kratzer Angelika. (1989) An investigation of the lumps of though. Linguistics and Philosophy 12(5): 607–653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kratzer, Angelika. 2004. Covert quantifier restrictions in natural languages. Talk given at Palazzo Feltrinelli in Gargnano, June 11, 2004.

  • Kratzer, Angelika. 2007. Situations in natural language semantics. In Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, ed. Edward N. Zalta. Stanford: CSLI Publications.

  • Kusumoto, Kiyomi. 1999. Tense in embedded contexts. PhD thesis, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.

  • Kusumoto Kiyomi. (2005) On the quantification over times in natural language. Natural Language Semantics 13(4): 317–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladusaw W. (1977) Some problems with tense in PTQ. Texas Linguistic Forum 6: 89–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Landman, Fred (2004) Indefinites and the type of sets. Blackwell, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis David. (1986) On the plurality of worlds. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthewson Lisa. (2001) Quantification and the nature of crosslinguistic variation. Natural Language Semantics 9(1): 145–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milsark, G. 1974. Existential sentences in English. PhD thesis, MIT.

  • Milsark G. (1977) Towards the explanation of certain peculiarities of existential sentences in English. Linguistic Analysis 3: 1–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Montague, R. 1974. Formal philosophy. Selected papers by Richard Montague, ed. R. H. Thomason. New Haven: Yale University Press.

  • Musan, Renate. 1995. On the temporal Interpretation of noun phrases. PhD thesis, MIT.

  • Ogihara T. (1992) Temporal reference in English and Japanese. Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogihara T. (1996) Tense, attitudes, and scope. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Percus Orin. (2000) Constraints on some other variables in syntax. Natural Language Semantics 8(3): 173–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell B. (1905) On denoting. Mind 14: 479–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwager, Magdalena. 2010. Speaking of qualities. In Proceedings of SALT 9. Ithaca: CLC Publications.

  • Schwarz, Florian. 2009. Two types of definites in natural language. PhD thesis, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.

  • Schwarz, Florian. 2011. Situation pronouns and domain restriction. Ms, University of Pennsylvania.

  • Soames Scott. (1986) Incomplete definite descriptions. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 27: 349–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stechow, A. von. 1984. Structured propositions and essential indexicals. In Varieties of formal semantics. Proceedings of the 4th Amsterdam Colloquium, ed. Fred Landman and Frank Feldman, 385–404. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.

  • Stowell, Tim. 1993. Syntax of tense. Ms., UCLA.

  • Vlach, Frank. 1973. ‘Now’ and ‘then’: A formal study in the logic of tense anaphora. PhD thesis, UCLA.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Florian Schwarz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schwarz, F. Situation pronouns in determiner phrases. Nat Lang Semantics 20, 431–475 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-012-9086-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-012-9086-1

Keywords

Navigation