Advertisement

Natural Language Semantics

, Volume 19, Issue 2, pp 169–190 | Cite as

Scales and comparison classes

  • Alan Clinton BaleEmail author
Article

Abstract

This paper discusses comparison classes—sets that relativize the interpretation of gradable adjectives, often specified with for-clauses as in John is smart for a linguist. Such a discussion ultimately lends support to the thesis that scales, degrees, measure functions, and linear orders are grammatically derived from more basic relations between individuals. Three accounts of comparison classes are compared and evaluated. The first proposes that such classes serve as an argument to a function that determines a standard of comparison. The second maintains that these classes restrict the domain of a measure function used to map entities to degrees. The third proposes that these classes limit the kind of individuals that participate in a binary relation; this relation is then used in the construction of a scale and a measure function. It is this third account that is most consistent with the empirical data. It can explain how comparison classes fix a standard of comparison, induce presuppositions concerning the comparative subjects, and induce incommensurability in comparative constructions.

Keywords

Comparison classes Scales Gradable adjectives Linear order Quasi-order 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bale, Alan Clinton. 2006. The universal scale and the semantics of comparison. Ph.D. Thesis, McGill University.Google Scholar
  2. Bale Alan Clinton. (2008) A Universal scale of comparison. Linguistics and Philosophy 31(1): 1–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bartsch, Renate, and Theo Vennemann. 1972. Semantic structures: A study in the relation between semantics and syntax. Frankfurt am Main: Athenaum.Google Scholar
  4. Bierwisch, Manfred. 1987. Semantik der Graduierung. In Grammatische und Konzeptuelle Aspekte von Dimensionsadjektiven, ed. M. Bierwisch and E. Lang, 91–286. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
  5. Bresnan Joan. (1973) Syntax of the comparative clause construction in English. Linguistic Inquiry 4(3): 275–344Google Scholar
  6. Bresnan Joan. (1975) Comparative deletion and constraints on transformations. Linguistic Analysis 1(1): 25–75Google Scholar
  7. Cresswell, M.J. 1976. The Semantics of degree. In Montague grammar, ed. B. Partee, 261–292. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  8. Graff Delia. (2000) Shifting sands: An interest-relative theory of vagueness. Philosophical Topics 20: 45–81Google Scholar
  9. Kennedy Christopher. (1999) Projecting the adjective: The syntax and semantics of gradability and comparison. Garland, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Kennedy Christopher. (2007) Vagueness and grammar: The semantics of relative and absolute gradable adjectives. Linguistics and Philosophy 30(1): 1–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kennedy Christopher, Louise McNally. (2005) Scale structure and the semantic typology of gradable predicates. Language 81: 345–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Klein Ewan. (1980) A Semantics for positive and comparative deletion. Linguistics and Philosophy 4(1): 1–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Klein Ewan. (1982) The interpretation of adjectival comparatives. Journal of Linguistics 18: 113–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Klein, Ewan. 1991. Comparatives. In Semantik/semantics: An international handbook of contemporary research, ed. A. von Stechow and D. Wunderlich, 673–691. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  15. Krantz D.H., Luce R.D., Tversky A. (1971) Foundations of measurement. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Ludlow Peter. (1989) Implicit comparison classes. Linguistics and Philosophy 12: 519–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McCawley, James D. 1979. Two notes on comparatives. In Adverbs, vowels, and other objects of wonder, 71–75. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  18. Platts Mark. (1979) Ways of meaning. Routledge and Kegan Paul, LondonGoogle Scholar
  19. Recanati François. (2004) Literal meaning. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  20. Stalnaker, Robert. 1974. Pragmatic presuppositions. In Semantics and philosophy: Essays, ed. Milton K. Munitz and Peter K. Unger, 197–213. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
  21. van Rooij, Robert. 2011. Implicit versus explicit comparatives. In Vagueness and language use, ed. P. Egre and N. Klinedinst, 51–72. Basinstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  22. van Rooij, Robert. To appear. Measurement, and interadjective comparisons. Journal of Semantics.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Linguistics Program, Concordia UniversityW. MontreálCanada

Personalised recommendations