Advertisement

The syntax of liketa

A case of restructuring in Appalachian English
Article

Abstract

In this article I provide a syntactic analysis for the non-standard liketa and its uncontracted counterpart liked to in Appalachian English. I argue that both forms are verbal and are related via restructuring, following similar analyses of wanna contraction. However, liketa is different from wanna in that it places unique aspectual restrictions on its complements. Specifically, it requires that the verb appearing immediately to the right be marked with past participle morphology for felicitous interpretation. A comparison of liketa and liked to reveals that both are verbal and liketa has many hallmark properties of restructuring predicates. In fact, it shares many properties with wanna contraction, an example of restructuring in English. I analyze liketa in the spirit of Wurmbrand (2001) who provides a mono-clausal approach to restructuring. I consider dialect variation among grammars which allow slightly different syntactic constraints on the usage of liketa. Finally, I sketch out an alternative bi-clausal restructuring account in order to compare the consequences of two prominent theories of restructuring verbs.

Keywords

Appalachian English Syntax Morphosyntax Variation Restructuring 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank my PhD advisor Alan Munn and the rest of my PhD committee for all of their work with me on this project. I also have to thank all of my AppE and non-AppE speaking friends, family, and informants for their input on this topic over many years. I want to thank members of the audiences of SECOL 79, LSA 2013, Christina Tortora and students in her 2013 LING 84100 class at the CUNY Gradate Center, and NYU’s Syntax Brown Bag. Thank you for all of your comments. A portion of this work was developed while I was a Post-doctoral Research Fellow at the City University of New York and The College of Staten Island. The requisite language follows: This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. (NSF Award #BCS-1152148).

Last and not least, I have to thank Mike Putnam for pointing out, many years ago, that I use liketa.

References

  1. Burzio, Luigi. 1986. Italian syntax: A government-binding approach, Vol. 1. Dordrecht: Reidel. Google Scholar
  2. Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A life in language, ed. Michael Kenstowicz, 1–52. Cambridge: MIT Press. Google Scholar
  3. Feagin, Crawford. 1979. Variation and change in Alabama English: A sociolinguistic study of the white community. Washington: Georgetown University Press. Google Scholar
  4. Frantz, Donald. 1977. A new view of to-contraction. In Work papers of the Summer Institute of Linguistics, Vol. 21, 71–76. Grand Forks: University of North Dakota. Google Scholar
  5. Givón, Talmy. 1994. Irrealis and the subjunctive. Studies in Language 18 (2): 265–337. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Goodall, Grant. 1991. Wanna-contraction as restructuring. In Interdisciplinary approaches to language: Essays in honor of S.-Y. Kuroda, eds. S. Y. Kuroda, Carol P. Georgopoulos, and Roberta L. Ishihara, 239–254. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Goodall, Grant. 2006. Contraction. In The Blackwell companion to syntax, eds. Martin Everaert and Henk C. van Riemsdijk, Vol. 19, 688–703. Malden: Wiley–Blackwell. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Green, Lisa J. 1993. Topics in African American English: The verb system analysis. Ph.D. diss., University of Massachusetts. Google Scholar
  9. Iatridou, Sabine. 2000. The grammatical ingredients of counterfactuality. Linguistic Inquiry 31 (2): 231–270. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Johnson, Greg. 2013. Liketa is not almost. In 36th annual Penn Linguistics Colloquium (PLC), Vol. 19.1. Philadelphia: The University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics. Google Scholar
  11. Johnson, Greg. 2014. Restructuring and infinitives: The view from Appalachia. Ph.D. diss., Michigan State University. Google Scholar
  12. Kratzer, Angelika. 1996. Severing the external argument from its verb. In Phrase structure and the lexicon, eds. Johan Rooryck and Laurie Zaring, 109–137. Dordrecht: Springer. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kytö, Merja, and Suzanne Romaine. 2005. “We had like to have been killed by thunder & lightning”: The semantic and pragmatic history of a construction that like to disappeared. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 6 (1): 1–35. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Labov, William. 1972. Language in the inner city: Studies in the Black English vernacular. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. Google Scholar
  15. Matthewson, Lisa. 2006. Temporal semantics in a superficially tenseless language. Linguistics and Philosophy 29 (6): 673–713. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Montgomery, Michael, and Joseph Hall. 2004. Dictionary of Smoky Mountain English. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press. Google Scholar
  17. Palmer, Frank Robert. 2001. Mood and modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Postal, Paul, and Geoffrey Pullum. 1982. The contraction debate. Linguistic Inquiry 13 (1): 122–138. Google Scholar
  19. Pullum, Geoffrey K. 1997. The morpholexical nature of English to-contraction. Language. Google Scholar
  20. Rapp, Irene, and Arnim von Stechow. 1999. Fast ‘almost’ and the visibility parameter for functional adverbs. Journal of Semantics 16 (2): 149. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rizzi, Luigi. 1982. Issues in Italian syntax, Vol. 11. Berlin: de Gruyter. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Roberts, Ian. 1997. Restructuring, head movement, and locality. Linguistic Inquiry 28 (3): 423–460. Google Scholar
  23. Roberts, Ian, and Anna Roussou. 2003. Syntactic change: A minimalist approach to grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ruffing, Katie, and Tom McCoy. 2015. Liketa. Yale Grammatical Diversity Project: English in North America. Available at: https://ygdp.yale.edu/phenomena/liketa. Accessed 24 January 2018.
  25. Steele, Susan. 1975. Past and irrealis: Just what does it all mean? International Journal of American Linguistics 41 (3): 200–217. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wolfram, Walt, and Donna Christian. 1976. Appalachian Speech. Arlington: Center for Applied Linguistics. Google Scholar
  27. Wurmbrand, Susanne. 2001. Infinitives: Restructuring and clause structure. Vol. 55 of Studies in generative grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar
  28. Zanuttini, Raffaella. 1996. On the relevance of tense for sentential negation. In Parameters and functional heads: Essays in comparative syntax, eds. Adriana Belletti and Luigi Rizzi. Oxford studies in comparative syntax, 181–207. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Louisiana State UniversityLouisianaUSA

Personalised recommendations