‘According to’ phrases and epistemic modals
I provide an objection to an argument targeting the claim that epistemic modality concerns what is possible or necessary given what is known. The argument centers around uses of epistemic modals that co-occur with adjuncts of the form ‘according to X’, those in which the content of some reported information is at issue. I argue that such contexts do not license us to reach the sort of conclusion that the argument aims to reach.
KeywordsEpistemic modality Evidentiality Necessity Knowledge Evidence
- AnderBois, Scott. 2014. On the exceptional status of reportative evidentials. In Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT), 24, 234–254. Google Scholar
- Faller, Martina. 2002. Semantics and pragmatics of evidentials in Cuzco Quechua. PhD diss., Stanford University. Google Scholar
- Kratzer, Angelika. 2010. Collected papers on modals and conditionals. Published as Kratzer (2012). Google Scholar
- Lassiter, Daniel. 2014. The weakness of must: In defense of a Mantra. In Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT), 24, 597–618. Google Scholar
- Williamson, Timothy. 2000. Knowledge and its limits. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar