Natural Language & Linguistic Theory

, Volume 33, Issue 3, pp 955–1001 | Cite as

Comparison classes and the relative/absolute distinction: a degree-based compositional account of the ser/estar alternation in Spanish

  • Silvia Gumiel-Molina
  • Norberto Moreno-Quibén
  • Isabel Pérez-Jiménez
Article

Abstract

The notion of comparison class has figured prominently in recent analyses of the gradability properties of adjectives. We assume that the comparison class is introduced by the degree morphology of the adjective and present a new proposal where comparison classes are crucial to explain the distribution of adjectives in Spanish copular sentences headed by the verbs ser ‘beSER’ and estar ‘beESTAR’. The copula estar ‘beestar’ appears whenever a gradable adjective merges with a within-individual comparison class, a modifier expressing a property of stages. The copular verb ser ‘beser’ appears when a gradable adjective merges with a between-individuals comparison class, a modifier expressing a property of individuals. The distinction between relative and absolute adjectives can be reduced to the semantic properties of the modifier expressing the comparison class that is merged in the functional structure of the adjective.

Keywords

Absolute Adjective Comparison class Copula Degree Estar Gradability Relative Ser 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Violeta Demonte, Olga Fernández Soriano, Manuel Leonetti, Louise McNally, Jesús Romero-Trillo and the audiences at the SEL 2012 meeting, the XX Incontro di Grammatica Generativa, the XX Colloquium on Generative Grammar, the WAASAP, the International workshopser and estar at the interfaces” and the members of the LyCC group, for their comments and suggestions on earlier versions of this paper. Thanks also to two anonymous reviewers and the editors of this special issue of NLLT, Elena Castroviejo and Berit Gehrke, whose comments have undoubtedly improved this article. The research underlying this work has been partly supported by a grant to the projects SPYCE II-(FFI2009-07456) and EventSynt-(FFI2009-07114) from the Spanish MICINN, and also by a grant to the project “La adquisición de los verbos copulativos ser y estar en niños de 3–6 años” (Ayudas concedidas a la Escuela de Magisterio en el marco del Convenio de Colaboración entre la Universidad de Alcalá e Ibercaja Obra Social y Cultural, 2011).

References

  1. Abney, Steven Paul. 1987. The English Noun Phrase in its sentential aspect. PhD diss., MIT, Cambridge, MA. Google Scholar
  2. Adger, David, and Gillian Ramchand. 2003. Predication and equation. Linguistic Inquiry 34: 325–359. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alexiadou, Artemis, Liliane Haegeman, and Melita Stavrou. 2007. Noun phrase in the generative perspective. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson, Curt, and Marcin Morzycki. 2015. Degrees as kinds. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory. Google Scholar
  5. Arche, María Jesús. 2006. Individuals in time: tense, aspect and the individual/stage distinction. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Arche, María Jesús. 2011. Las oraciones copulativas agentivas. In 60 problemas de gramática, eds. Victoria Escandell, Manuel Leonetti, and Cristina Sánchez, 99–105. Barcelona: Akal. Google Scholar
  7. Arsenijević, Boban, Gemma Boleda, Berit Gehrke, and Louise McNally. In press. Ethnic adjectives are proper adjectives. In Chicago Linguistic Society (CLS) 46. Google Scholar
  8. Asher, Nicholas, and Michael Morreau. 1995. What generic sentences mean. In The generic book, eds. Gregory Carlson and Francis Jeffry Pelletier, 300–338. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
  9. Baker, Mark C. 2003. Lexical categories. Verbs, nouns and adjectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bale, Alan. 2011. Scales and comparison classes. Natural Language Semantics 19: 169–190. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Beltrama, Andrea, and Ryan Bochnak. 2015. Intensification without degrees cross-linguistically. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory. Google Scholar
  12. Bhatt, Rajesh, and Roumyana Izvorsky. 1998. Genericity, implicit arguments and control. In Student Conference in Linguistics (SCIL) 7. Google Scholar
  13. Bierwisch, Manfred. 1989. The semantics of gradation. In Dimensional adjectives: grammatical structure and conceptual interpretation, eds. Manfred Bierwisch and Ewald Lang, 71–237. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Boleda, Gemma, Stefan Evert, Berit Gehrke, and Louise McNally. 2012. Adjectives as saturators vs. modifiers: statistical evidence. In Logic, language and meaning, eds. Maria Aloni, Vadim Kimmelman, Floris Roelofsen, Galit Sassoon, Katrin Schulz, and Matthijs Westera, 18th Amsterdam Colloquium, The Netherlands, December 19–21, 2011, 112–121. Dordrecht: Springer. Revised selected papers. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bolinger, Dwight. 1947. Still more on ser and estar. Hispania 30: 361–366. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Borer, Hagit. 2005. Structuring sense. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bosque, Ignacio. 1990. Sobre el aspecto en los participios y los adjetivos. In Tiempo y aspecto en Español, ed. Ignacio Bosque, 177–210. Madrid: Cátedra. Google Scholar
  18. Bowers, John. 1993. The syntax of predication. Linguistic Inquiry 24: 591–656. Google Scholar
  19. Brownlow, Oliver. 2011. Towards a unified analysis of the syntax and semantics of get constructions. PhD diss., University of London, Queen Mary. Google Scholar
  20. Brucart, Josep Maria. 2009. La alternancia ser/estar y las construcciones atributivas de localización. In Actas del V Encuentro de Gramática Generativa, ed. Alicia Avellana. 115–152. Neuquén: EDUCO. Google Scholar
  21. Camacho, José. 2012. Ser and estar: the individual / stage level distinction and aspectual predication. In The handbook of Spanish linguistics, eds. José Ignacio Hualde, Antxon Olarrea, and Erin O’Rourke, 453–476. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Carlson, Gregory. 1977. Reference to kinds in English. PhD diss., UMass, Amherst. Google Scholar
  23. Carlson, Gregory. 2010. Generics and concepts. In Kinds, things, and stuff. Mass terms and generics, ed. Francis Jeffry Pelletier, 16–35. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  24. Cinque, Guglielmo. 1994. On evidence for partial N-movement in the Romance DP. In Paths towards universal grammar. Studies in honor of Richard S. Kayne, eds. Guiglielmo Cinque, Jan Koster, Jean-Yves Pollock, Luigi Rizzi, and Raffaella Zanuttini, 85–110. Georgetown: Georgetown University Press. Google Scholar
  25. Cinque, Guiglielmo. 2010. The syntax of adjectives: a comprehensive study. Cambridge: MIT Press. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Clements, J. Clancy. 1988. The semantics and pragmatics of Spanish 〈COPULA〉+ADJECTIVE construction. Linguistics 26: 779–822. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Contreras, Heles. 1993. On null operator structures. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 11: 1–30. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Corver, Norbert. 1991. Evidence for DegP. In North East Linguistics Society (NELS) 21, 33–47. Amherst: University of Massachusetts. Google Scholar
  29. Crespo, Luis. 1946. Los verbos ser y estar explicados por un nativo. Hispania 29: 45–55. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Cuervo, María Cristina. 2008. Some datives are born, some are made. In Hispanic Linguistics Symposium 12, eds. Claudia Borgonovo, Manuel Español-Echevarría, and Philippe Prévost, 26–37. Somerville: Cascadilla Proceedings Project. Google Scholar
  31. Cuervo, María Cristina. 2010. Against ditransitivity. Probus 22: 151–180. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Demonte, Violeta. 1999. A minimal account of Spanish adjective position and interpretation. In Grammatical analyses in Basque and Romance linguistics, eds. Jon Franco, Alazne Landa, and Juan Martín, 45–75. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Demonte, Violeta. 2008. Meaning-form correlations and the order of adjectives in Spanish. In Adjectives and adverbs: syntax, semantics and discourse, eds. Louise McNally and Christopher Kennedy, 71–100. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  34. Demonte, Violeta. 2011. Adjectives. In Semantics: an international handbook of natural language meaning, eds. Claudia Maienborn, Klaus von Heusinger, and Paul Portner, 1314–1340. Berlin: de Gruyter. Google Scholar
  35. Diesing, Molly. 1992. Indefinites. Cambridge: MIT Press. Google Scholar
  36. Dixon, Robert M. W. 1982. Where have all the adjectives gone? Studies in Languages 1: 19–80. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Epstein, Samuel. 1984. Quantifier-pro and the LF representation of PROarb. Linguistic Inquiry 15: 499–505. Google Scholar
  38. Escandell, Victoria, and Manuel Leonetti. 2002. Coercion and the stage/individual distinction. In Semantics and pragmatics of Spanish, ed. Javier Gutiérrez-Rexach, 159–180. Amsterdam: Elsevier. Google Scholar
  39. Fábregas, Antonio. 2007. The internal syntactic structure of relational adjectives. Probus 19: 1–36. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Fábregas, Antonio. 2012. A guide to IL and SL in Spanish: properties, problems and proposals. Borealis. An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics 1–2: 1–71. doi:10.7557/1.1.2.2296. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Falk, Johan. 1979. Visión de norma general vs. norma individual. Ensayo de explicación de la oposición ser/estar en unión con adjetivos que denotan belleza y corpulencia. Studia Neophilologica 51: 275–293. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Fernández Leborans, María Jesús. 1999. La predicación: las oraciones copulativas. In Gramática descriptiva de la lengua Española, eds. Ignacio Bosque and Violeta Demonte, 2357–2460. Madrid: RAE-Espasa Calpe. Google Scholar
  43. Franco, Fabiola, and Donald Steinmetz. 1983. Ser y estar + adjetivo calificativo en Español. Hispania 66: 176–184. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Franco, Fabiola, and Donald Steinmetz. 1986. Taming ser and estar with predicate adjectives. Hispania 69: 379–386. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Fults, Scott. 2006. The structure of comparison: an investigation of gradable adjectives. PhD diss., University of Maryland, College Park. Google Scholar
  46. Gallego, Ángel, and Juan Uriagereka. 2009. Estar = Ser + P. Paper presented at the XIX Colloquium on Generative Grammar, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Universidad del País Vasco. Google Scholar
  47. Gehrke, Berit. 2015. Different ways to be passive. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory. Google Scholar
  48. Gil, Irene, and Edita Gutiérrez. 2012. Características morfosintácticas de los adjetivos descriptivos. In Lingüística XL. El lingüista del siglo XXI, eds. Adrián Cabedo Nebot and Patricia Infante Ríos, 323–330. Madrid: SEL Ediciones. Google Scholar
  49. Gili Gaya, Samuel. 1961. Curso superior de sintaxis española. Barcelona: Spes. Google Scholar
  50. Gumiel-Molina, Silvia, and Isabel Pérez-Jiménez. 2012. Aspectual composition in “ser/estar + adjective” structures: adjectival scalarity and verbal aspect in copular constructions. Borealis. An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics 1: 33–62. http://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/borealis/article/view/2321. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Gumiel-Molina, Silvia, Norberto Moreno-Quibén, and Isabel Pérez-Jiménez. 2013. On the aspectual properties of adjectives. Talk presented at the Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSLR) 43. New York: CUNY, April 2013. Google Scholar
  52. Gutiérrez-Rexach, Javier, and Enrique Mallén. 2001. NP movement and adjective position in the DP phases. In Features and interfaces in Romance, eds. Julia Herschensohn, Enrique Mallén, and Karen Zagona, 107–132. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Gutiérrez-Rexach, Javier, and Enrique Mallén. 2002. Toward a unified minimalist analysis of prenominal adjectives. In Structure, meaning and acquisition in Spanish. Papers from the 4th Hispanic Linguistic Symposium, ed. Clancy Clements, 178–192. Somerville: Cascadilla Press. Google Scholar
  54. Hanssen, Federico. 1913. Gramática histórica de la lengua castellana, Paris, 1966. Google Scholar
  55. Husband, Matthew. 2010. On the compositional nature of stativity. PhD diss., Michigan State University, Michigan. Google Scholar
  56. Husband, Matthew. 2012. On the compositional nature of states. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Jiménez-Fernández, Ángel. 2012. What information structure tells us about individual/stage-level predicates. Borealis. An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics 1: 1–32. http://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/borealis/article/view/2293. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Kennedy, Cristopher, and Louise McNally. 1999. From event structure to scale structure: degree modification in deverbal adjectives. In Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 9, eds. Tanya Matthews and Devon Strolovitch, 163–180. Ithaca: CLS Publications. Google Scholar
  59. Kennedy, Cristopher, and Louise McNally. 2005. Scale structure, degree modification, and the semantics of gradable predicates. Language 81: 345–381. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Kennedy, Cristopher. 1999. Projecting the adjective: the syntax and semantics of gradability and comparison Outstanding dissertations in linguistics. New York: Garland. Google Scholar
  61. Kennedy, Cristopher. 2007. Vagueness and grammar: the semantics of relative and absolute gradable adjectives. Linguistics and Philosophy 30: 1–45. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Klein, Wolfgang. 1980. Some remarks on Sanders’ typology of elliptical coordinations. Linguistics 18: 871–876. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Kratzer, Angelika. 1988/1995. Stage-level/individual-level predicates. In The generic book, eds. Gregory Carlson and Francis Jeffry Pelletier, 125–175. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
  64. Krifka, Manfred, Francis Jeffy Pelletier, Gregory N. Carlson, Alice ter Meulen, Gennaro Chierchia, and Godehard Link. 1995. Genericity: an introduction. In The generic book, eds. Gregory Carlson and Francis Jeffry Pelletier, 1–124. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
  65. Krifka, Manfred. 1989/1992. Thematic relations as links between nominal Reference and temporal constitution. In Lexical matters, eds. Ivan Sag and Ana Szabolcsi, 29–53. Chicago: CSLI Publications, Chicago University Press. Google Scholar
  66. Kubota, Ai. 2015. Transforming manner adverbs into surface-subject oriented adverbs: evidence from Japanese. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory. Google Scholar
  67. Landman, Meredith, and Marcin Morzycki. 2003. Event-kinds and the representation of manner. In Western Conference in Linguistics (WECOL) 11. http://www.er.uqam.ca/merlin/dg791357/material/papers/event_kinds. Google Scholar
  68. Larson, Richard K., and Nagaya Takahashi. 2007. In Altaic formal linguistics II, eds. Meltem Kelepir and Balkız Öztürk. Vol. 54 of MIT working papers in linguistics, 101–120. Cambridge: MITWPL. Google Scholar
  69. Lasersohn, Peter. 2005. Context dependence, disagreement and predicates of personal taste. Linguistics and Philosophy 28: 643–686. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Lewis, David K. 1983. Philosophical papers. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  71. Ludlow, Peter. 1989. Implicit comparison classes. Linguistics and Philosophy 12: 519–533. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Luján, Marta. 1981. Spanish copulas as aspect indicators. Lingua 54: 165–210. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Magri, Giorgio. 2009. A theory of individual-level predicates based on blind mandatory scalar implicatures. Natural Language Semantics 17: 245–297. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Maienborn, Claudia. 2003. Against a Davidsonian analysis of copula sentences. In North East Linguistics Society (NELS) 33, 167–186. Amherst: GLSA. Google Scholar
  75. Maienborn, Claudia. 2005. A discourse-based account of Spanish ser/estar. Linguistics 43: 155–180. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Mallén, Enrique. 2001. Issues in the syntax of DP in Romance and Germanic. In Current issues in Spanish syntax and semantics, eds. Javier Gutiérrez-Rexach and Luis Silva Villar, 39–64. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter. Google Scholar
  77. Marín, Rafael. 2010. Spanish adjectives within bounds. In Adjectives: formal analyses in syntax and semantics, eds. Patricia Cabredo-Hofherr and Ora Mathushansky, 307–332. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. McNally, Louise. 1994. Adjunct predicates and the individual/stage distinction. In West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL) 12, 561–576. Google Scholar
  79. McNally, Louise. 1998. Stativity and theticity. In Events and grammar, ed. Susan Rothstein, 293–308. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. McNally, Louise. 2011. The relative role of property type and scale structure in explaining the behavior of gradable adjectives. In Vagueness in Communication (ViC) 2009, eds. Rick Nouwen, Robert van Rooij, Uli Sauerland, and Hans-Christian Schmitz, 151–168. Berlin: Springer. Google Scholar
  81. McNally, Louise. 2012. Relative and absolute standards and degree achievements. Ms., Universitat Pompeu Fabra. Google Scholar
  82. Mikkelsen, Line. 2005. Copular clauses: specification, predication and equation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Pancheva, Roumyana. 2006. Phrasal and clausal comparatives in Slavic. In Annual Workshop On Formal Approaches To Slavic Linguistics. The Princeton meeting, eds. James E. Lavine, Steven Franks, Hana Filip, and Mila Tasseva-Kurktchieva, 236–257. Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications. Google Scholar
  84. Park, So-Young. 2008. Functional categories: the syntax of DP and DegP. PhD diss., University of Southern California. Google Scholar
  85. Percus, Orin J. 1997. Aspects of A. PhD diss., MIT, Cambridge, MA. Google Scholar
  86. Pujalte, Mercedes. 2009. Condiciones sobre la introducción de argumentos: el caso de la alternancia dativa en Español. Master Thesis, Universidad Nacional del Comahue. Google Scholar
  87. Pylkkänen, Liina. 2002. Introducing arguments. PhD diss., MIT, Cambridge, MA. Google Scholar
  88. Pylkkänen, Liina. 2008. Introducing arguments. Cambridge: MIT press. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Roby, David. B. 2009. Aspect and the categorization of states. The case of ser and estar Spanish. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Roldán, Mercedes. 1974. Toward a semantic characterization of ser and estar. Hispania 57: 68–75. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Romero, Juan. 2009. El sujeto en las construcciones copulativas. Verba 36: 195–214. Google Scholar
  92. Rothstein, Susan. 2001. Predicates and their subjects. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar
  93. Rotstein, Carmen, and Yoad Winter. 2004. Total adjectives vs. partial adjectives: scale structure and higher-order modifiers. Natural Language Semantics 12: 259–288. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Roy, Isabelle. 2013. Non-verbal predication. Copular sentences at the syntax-semantics interface. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Sánchez Masiá, Melania. 2013. Sobre los tipos de escala en la estructura interna de nombres y adjetivos. Talk presented at the XLII Symposium of the Sociedad Española de Lingüística, Madrid, January 2013. Google Scholar
  96. Sánchez, Liliana. 1996. Word order, predication and agreement in DPs in Spanish, Southern Quechua and Southern Andean Bilingual Spanish. In Grammatical theory and Romance languages, ed. Karen Zagona, 209–218. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Sassoon, Galit, and Assaf Toledo. 2011. Absolute and relative adjectives and their comparison classes. Ms., Institute for Logic, Language and Computation, University of Amsterdam and Utrecht University. Google Scholar
  98. Schmitt, Cristina, and Karen Miller. 2007. Making discourse-dependent decisions: the case of the copulas ser and estar in Spanish. Lingua 117: 1907–1929. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Schmitt, Cristina. 2005. Semi-copulas: event and aspectual composition. In Aspectual inquiries, eds. Paula Kempchinsky and Roumyana Slabakova, 121–145. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Solt, Stephanie. 2011. Notes on the comparison class. In Vagueness in Communication (ViC) 2009, revised selected papers, eds. Rick Nowen, Robert van Rooij, Uli Sauerland, and Hans-Christian Schmitz. Vol. 6571 of LNA, 189–206. Berlin: Springer. Google Scholar
  101. Solt, Stephanie. 2012. Comparison to arbitrary standards. In Sinn und Bedeutung 16, eds. Ana Aguilar Guevara, Anna Chernilovskaya, and Rick Nouwen, Vol. 2, 557–570. Cambridge: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics. Google Scholar
  102. Stanley, Jason. 2000. Context and logical form. Linguistics and Philosophy 23(4): 391–434. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Stowell, Tim. 1991. The alignment of arguments in adjective phrases. In Perspectives on phrase structure: heads and licensing, ed. Susan Rothstein. Vol. 25 of Syntax and semantics, 105–135. New York: Academic Press. Google Scholar
  104. Syrett, Kristen. 2007. Learning about the structure of scales: adverbial modification and the acquisition of the semantics of gradable adjectives. PhD diss., Northwestern University, Evanston, IL. Google Scholar
  105. Thomas, Guillaume. 2012. Temporal implicatures. PhD diss., MIT, Cambridge, MA. Google Scholar
  106. Toledo, Assaf, and Galit Sassoon. 2011. Absolute vs. relative adjectives—variance within vs. between individuals. In Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 21, 135–154. Google Scholar
  107. Wilkinson, Karina. 1991. Studies in the semantics of generic Noun Phrases. PhD diss., University of Massachusetts at Amherst. Google Scholar
  108. Zagona, Karen. 2010. Ser and estar: phrase structure and aspect. In Chronos 8 Cahiers Chronos, eds. Chiyo Nishida and Cinzia Russi, 1–24. Amsterdam: Rodopi. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Silvia Gumiel-Molina
    • 1
  • Norberto Moreno-Quibén
    • 2
  • Isabel Pérez-Jiménez
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Universidad de AlcaláAlcalá de HenaresSpain
  2. 2.ILLA-CCHS-Consejo Superior de Investigaciones CientíficasMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations