Natural Language & Linguistic Theory

, Volume 33, Issue 4, pp 1235–1270 | Cite as

Maximal prominence and a theory of possible licensors

Article

Abstract

Languages often single out prominent positions for special consideration, allowing certain elements to appear only in those positions. Often material in the prominent position surfaces faithfully but neutralizes elsewhere (preservation systems), but other systems involve the spreading or migration of features to the prominent position to comply with the positional restriction (overwrite systems). The set of positions that behave as prominent for preservation seems to be a superset of the positions that behave as prominent for overwrite. This paper argues that this asymmetry stems from differences between positional faithfulness and positional licensing. Only positional licensing produces overwrite; it is argued here that it may target only the most prominent positions, while positional faithfulness, which produces preservation, may target all kinds of prominent positions.

Keywords

Prominence Positional licensing Positional faithfulness Positional markedness 

References

  1. Archangeli, Diana, and Douglas Pulleyblank. 1994. Grounded phonology. Cambridge: MIT Press. Google Scholar
  2. Bach, Emmon. 1968. Two proposals regarding the simplicity metric in phonology. Glossa 2(2): 128–149. Google Scholar
  3. Barnes, Jonathan. 2006. Strength and weakness at the interface: positional neutralization in phonetics and phonology. Berlin: de Gruyter. Google Scholar
  4. Beckman, Jill N. 1999. Positional faithfulness. New York: Garland. Google Scholar
  5. Benua, Laura. 1997. Transderivational identity: phonological relations between words. PhD diss., University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Google Scholar
  6. Bethin, Christina Y. 2006. Stress and tone in East Slavic dialects. Phonology 23(2): 125–156. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown, Roger, and David McNeill. 1966. The “tip of the tongue” phenomenon. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 5(4): 325–337. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bye, Patrick, and Paul de Lacy. 2000. Edge asymmetries in phonology and morphology. In North East Linguistics Society (NELS) 30, eds. Ji-Yung Kim and Masako Hirotani, 121–135. Amherst: GLSA. Google Scholar
  9. Campbell, Alistair. 1959. Old English grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  10. Canalis, Stefano. 2007. Total Vowel Harmony in Two Romance Dialects. Handout from talk presented at Phonetics and Phonology in Iberia, Universidade do Minho, Braga, June 25–26. Google Scholar
  11. Canalis, Stefano. 2009. Post-tonic vowel harmony in some dialects of Central Italy: the role of prosodic structure, contrast, and consonants. In Phonetics and phonology: interactions and interrelations, eds. Marina Vigario, Sonia Frota, and M. Joan Freitas, 48–67. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar
  12. Canalis, Stefano. to appear. Post-tonic vowel harmony in some dialects of Central Italy. In Phonetics and phonology in Iberia (PaPI) 3, 247–266. Google Scholar
  13. Cerrón-Palomino, Rodolfo. 2000. Lingüistica aimara. Cuzco: Bartolomé de Las Casas. Google Scholar
  14. Christdas, Prathima. 1988. The phonology and morphology of Tamil. PhD diss., Cornell University. Google Scholar
  15. Chung, Sandra. 1983. Transderivational relationships in Chamorro phonology. Language 59: 35–66. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Clark, Mary M. 1983. On the distribution of contour tones. In West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL), 44–55. Google Scholar
  17. Cole, Ronald A. 1973. Listening for mispronunciations: a measure of what we hear during speech. Perception and Psychophysics 1: 153–156. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cole, Ronald A., and Jola Jakimik. 1980. How are syllables used to recognize words? Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 67(3): 965–970. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Crosswhite, Katherine M. 1996. Base-derivative correspondences in Chamorro. In UCLA Working Papers in Phonology, ed. Chai-Shune Hsu, Vol. 93, 57–85. UCLA Graduate Linguistics Circle. Google Scholar
  20. Crosswhite, Katherine M. 2001. Vowel reduction in Optimality Theory. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar
  21. Dell, François, and Mohamed Elmedlaoui. 1985. Syllabic consonants and syllabification in Imdlawn Tashlhiyt Berber. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 7: 105–130. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dell, François, and Mohamed Elmedlaoui. 1988. Syllabic consonants in Berber: some new evidence. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 10(1): 1–17. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dell, François, and Mohamed Elmedlaoui. 2002. Syllables in Tashlhiyt Berber and in Moroccan Arabic. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dudas, Karen Marie. 1976. The phonology and morphology of Modern Javanese. PhD diss., University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois. Google Scholar
  25. Fougeron, Cécile. 1997. Prosodically conditioned articulatory variation: a review. In UCLA working papers in phonetics, Vol. 97, 1–73. Google Scholar
  26. Fowler, Carol A., Shirley E. Napps, and Laurie Feldman. 1985. Relations among regular and irregular morphologically related words in the lexicon as revealed by repetition priming. Memory and Cognition 13(3): 241–255. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Goldsmith, John. 1989. Licensing, inalterability, and harmonic rule application. In Chicago Linguistic Society: Part one: The general session (CLS) 25, eds. Caroline Wiltshire, Randolph Graczyk, and Bradley Music, 145–156. Google Scholar
  28. Gregores, Emma, and Jorge A. Suárez. 1967. A description of colloquial Guaraní. The Hague: Mouton. Google Scholar
  29. Hansson, Gunnar Ólafur. 2001. Theoretical and typological issues in consonant harmony. PhD diss., University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA. Google Scholar
  30. Hayes, Bruce. 1995. Metrical stress theory: principles and case studies. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
  31. Hayes, Bruce. 1999. Phonetically driven phonology: the role of Optimality Theory and inductive grounding. In Functionalism and formalism in linguistics, Volume I: General papers, eds. Michael Darnell, Edith Moravscik, Michael Noonan, Frederick Newmeyer, and Kathleen Wheatly, 243–285. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hock, Hans Henrich. 1999. Finality, prosody, and change. In Linguistics and phonetics (LP ’98): item and order in language and speech, eds. Osamu Fujimura, Brian D. Joseph, and Bohumil Palek, 15–30. Prague: Prague Karolinum Press. Google Scholar
  33. Hogg, Richard M. 1992. A grammar of Old English: Volume 1: Phonology. Cambridge: Blackwell. Google Scholar
  34. Horne, Merle, Eva Strangert, and Mattias Heldner. 1995. Prosodic boundary strength in Swedish: final lengthening and silent interval duration. In International Congress of Phonetic Sciences XIII, eds. Kjell Elenius and Peter Branderud, 170–173. Stockholm, Sweden. Google Scholar
  35. Horowitz, Leonard M., Margaret A. White, and Douglas W. Atwood. 1968. Word fragments as aids to recall: the organization of a word. Journal of Experimental Psychology 76(2): 219–226. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hyman, Larry M. 1988. Underspecification and vowel height transfer in Esimbi. Phonology 5(2): 255–273. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hyman, Larry M. 2002. Is there a right-to-left bias in vowel harmony? Ms., UC Berkeley. Google Scholar
  38. Hyman, Larry M. 2008. Directional asymmetries in the morphology and phonology of words, with special reference to Bantu. Linguistics 46(2): 309–350. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ito, Junko. 1988. Syllable theory in prosodic phonology. PhD diss., University of Massachusetts, Amherst, New York. Google Scholar
  40. Ito, Junko, and Armin Mester. 1999. Realignment. In The prosody-morphology interface, eds. René Kager, Harry van der Hulst, and Wim Zonneveld, 188–217. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ito, Junko, and Armin Mester. 2009. The extended prosodic word. In Phonological domains: universals and derivations, eds. Baris Kabak and Jaent Grijzenhout, 135–194. The Hague: de Gruyter. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ito, Junko, and Armin Mester. 2010. Recursive prosodic phrasing in Japanese. In Japanese/Korean Conference (JK18) 18, 147–164. Stanford: CSLI. Google Scholar
  43. Ito, Junko, and Armin Mester. 2013. Prosodic subcategories in Japanese. Lingua 124: 20–40. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Jarvella, Robert J., and Guust Meijers. 1983. Recognizing morphemes in spoken words: some evidence for a stem-organized mental lexicon. In The process of language understanding, eds. Giovanni B. Flores d’Arcais and Robert J. Jarvella, 81–112. New York: Wiley. Google Scholar
  45. Jesney, Karen. 2011. Licensing in multiple contexts: an argument for Harmonic Grammar. In Chicago linguistic society (cls) 45, eds. M. Ryan Bochnak, Peter Klecha, Alice Lemieux, Nassira Nicola, Jasmin Urban, and Christina Weaver, Vol. 1, 287–301. Chicago: University of Chicago. Google Scholar
  46. Kaplan, Aaron F. 2008a. Licensing and noniterative harmony in Lango. In North East Linguistics Society (NELS) 37, eds. Emily Elfner and Martin Walkow, Vol. 1, 311–322. Google Scholar
  47. Kaplan, Aaron F. 2008b. Noniterativity is an emergent property of grammar. PhD diss., University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA. Google Scholar
  48. Kaplan, Aaron. 2011. Gradualness and harmonic improvement without candidate chains in Chamorro. Linguistic Inquiry 42(4): 631–650. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kawahara, Shigeto. 2008. On the proper treatment of non-crisp edges. In Japanese/Korean linguistics, eds. Mutsuko Endo Hudson, Peter Sells, and Sun-Ah Jun, Vol. 13, 55–67. Stanford: CSLI Publications. Google Scholar
  50. Kehoe, Margaret, and Carol Stoel-Gammon. 1997. The acquisition of prosodic structure: an investigation of current accounts of children’s prosodic development. Language 73(1): 113–144. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kempley, S. T., and John Morton. 1982. The effects of priming with regularly and irregularly related words in auditory word recognition. British Journal of Psychology 73: 441–454. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Kiparsky, Paul. 1986. Systematic optionality in the lexical phonology of Chamorro. Ms., Stanford University. Google Scholar
  53. Lehiste, Ilse. 1970. Suprasegmentals. Cambridge: MIT Press. Google Scholar
  54. Lehiste, Ilse. 1972. The timing of utterances and linguistic boundaries. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America (JASA) 51(6): 2018–2024. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Lehiste, Ilse, Joseph P. Olive, and Lynn A. Streeter. 1976. Role of duration in disambiguating syntactically ambiguous sentences. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America (JASA) 60(5): 1199–1202. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Lombardi, Linda. 1994. Laryngeal features and laryngeal neutralization. New York: Garland. Google Scholar
  57. Lunden, S. L. Anya. 2006. Weight, final lengthening and stress: a phonetic and phonological case study of Norwegian. PhD diss., University of California, Santa Cruz. Google Scholar
  58. Magen, Harriet S. 1997. The extent of vowel-to-vowel coarticulation in English. Journal of Phonetics 25: 187–205. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Maiden, Martin. 1995. Evidence from the Italian dialects for the internal structure of prosodic domains. In Linguistic theory in the Romance languages, eds. John Charles Smith and Martin Maiden, 115–131. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. McCarthy, John J. 2003. OT constraints are categorical. Phonology 20(1): 75–138. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. McCarthy, John J. 2008a. The gradual path to cluster simplification. Phonology 25: 271–319. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. McCarthy, John J. 2008b. The serial interaction of stress and syncope. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory (NLLT) 26: 499–546. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. McCarthy, John J., and Alan Prince. 1986. Prosodic morphology. Ms., University of Massachusetts, Amherst, and Brandeis University. Google Scholar
  64. McCarthy, John J., and Alan Prince. 1995. Faithfulness and reduplicative identity. In University of Massachusetts occasional papers in linguistics 18: papers in Optimality Theory, eds. Jill Beckman, Laura Walsh Dickey, and Suzanne Urbanczyk, 149–348. Amherst: GLSA. Google Scholar
  65. Noonan, Michael. 1992. A grammar of Lango. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Oller, D. Kimbrough. 1973. The effect of position in utterance on speech segment duration in English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America (JASA) 54(5): 1235–1247. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Parker, Steve, and David Weber. 1996. Glottalized and aspriated stops in Cuzco Quechua. International Journal of American Linguistics 62(1): 70–85. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Paster, Mary. 2004. Vowel height harmony and blocking in Buchan Scots. Phonology 21(3): 359–407. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Penny, Ralph J. 1969. Vowel harmony in the speech of the Montes de Pas (Santander). Orbis 18(1): 148–166. Google Scholar
  70. Plag, Ingo, Gero Kunter, and Mareile Schramm. 2011. Acoustic correlates of primary and secondary stress in North American English. Journal of Phonetics 39: 362–374. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Poppe, Nicholas. 1954. Grammar of written Mongolian. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz. Google Scholar
  72. Poppe, Nicholas. 1955. Introduction to Mongolian comparative studies. Mémoirs de la société finno-ougrienne no. 110. Helsinki. Google Scholar
  73. Prince, Alan, and Paul Smolensky. 1993/2004. Optimality Theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. Ms., Rutgers University, New Brunswick and University of Colorado, Boulder. Published 2004. Malden: Blackwell. Google Scholar
  74. Puech, Gilbert. 1978. A cross-dialectal study of vowel harmony in Maltese. In Chicago Linguistics Society (cls) 14, eds. Donka Farkas, Wesley M. Jacobsen, and Karol W. Todrys, 377–389. Chicago: CLS. Google Scholar
  75. Rice, Keren. 2003. Featural markedness in phonology: variation. In The second glot international state-of-the-article book, eds. Lisa Cheng and Rint Sybesma, 389–429. Berlin: de Gruyter. Google Scholar
  76. Rice, Keren. 2007. Markedness in phonology. In The Cambridge handbook of phonology, ed. Paul de Lacy, 79–97. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
  77. Rivas, Alberto M. 1975. Nasalization in Guaraní. In North Eastern Linguistic Society (NELS) 5, eds. Ellen Kaisse and Jorge Hankamer, 134–143. Cambridge: Harvard University Linguistics Department. Google Scholar
  78. Rosenberg, Sheldon, Paul J. Coyle, and Walter L. Porter. 1966. Recall of adverbs as a function of the frequency of their adjective roots. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 5: 75–76. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Schuh, Russel G., and Lawan D. Yalwa. 1999. Hausa. In Handbook of the international phonetic association, 90–95. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
  80. Smith, Jennifer L. 2005. Phonological augmentation in prominent positions. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar
  81. Smolensky, Paul. 2006. Optimality in phonology II: harmonic completeness, local constraint conjunction, and feature domain markedness. In The harmonic mind: from neural computation to Optimality-Theoretic grammar, eds. Paul Smolensky and Géraldine Legendre, Vol. 2, 27–160. Cambridge/London: MIT Press. Chap. 14. Google Scholar
  82. Stallcup, Kenneth. 1980a. A brief account of nominal prefixes and vowel harmony in Esimbi. In L’expansion bantoue, ed. Luc Bouquiaux, Vol. II, 435–441. Paris: Société d’Etudes Linguistiques et Anthropologiques de France. Google Scholar
  83. Stallcup, Kenneth L. 1980b. Noun classes in Esimbi. In Noun classes in the Grassfields Bantu borderland, ed. Larry M. Hyman. Vol. 8 of Southern California occasional papers in linguistics, 139–153. Los Angeles: Department of Linguistics, University of Southern California. Google Scholar
  84. Stanners, Robert F., James J. Neiser, William P. Hernon, and Roger Hall. 1970. Memory representation for morphologically related words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 18(4): 399–412. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Steriade, Donca. 1995. Underspecification and markedness. In Handbook of phonological theory, ed. John Goldsmith, 114–174. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar
  86. Steriade, Donca. 1999. Phonetics in phonology: the case of laryngeal neutralization. In UCLA working papers in linguistics, ed. Matthew K. Gordon, Vol. 2, 25–146. Google Scholar
  87. Taft, Marcus, Gail Hambly, and Sachiko Kinoshita. 1986. Visual and auditory recognition of prefixed words. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 38A: 351–366. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Topping, Donald M. 1968. Chamorro vowel harmony. Oceanic Linguistics 7(1): 67–79. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. van Heuven, Vincent J. 1987. Stress patterns in Dutch (compound) adjectives: acoustic measurements and perception data. Phonetica 44: 1–12. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Walker, Rachel. 2001. Round licensing, harmony, and bisyllabic triggers in Altaic. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory (NLLT) 19: 827–878. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Walker, Rachel. 2004. Vowel feature licensing at a distance: evidence from northern Spanish language varieties. In West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL) 23, eds. Benjamin Schmeiser, Vineeta Chand, Ann Kelleher, and Angelo J. Rodriguez, 787–800. Somerville: Cascadilla. Google Scholar
  92. Walker, Rachel. 2005. Weak triggers in vowel harmony. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory (NLLT) 23: 917–989. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Walker, Rachel. 2008. Gradualness and fell-swoop derivations. Handout from talk presented at the UCSC Alumni Conference, Sept. 13. Google Scholar
  94. Walker, Rachel. 2010. Nonmyopic harmony and the nature of derivations. Linguistic Inquiry 41(1): 169–179. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Walker, Rachel. 2011. Vowel patterns in language. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Wightman, Colin W., Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel, Mari Ostendorf, and Patti J. Price. 1992. Segmental durations in the vicinity of prosodic phrase boundaries. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America (JASA) 91(3): 1707–1717. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Woock, Edith Bavin, and Michael Noonan. 1979. Vowel harmony in Lango. In Chicago Linguistic Society (CLS) 15, eds. Paul R. Clyne, William F. Hanks, and Carol L. Hofbauer. Google Scholar
  98. Zhang, Jie. 2001. The effects of duration and sonority on contour tone distribution-typological survey and formal analysis. PhD diss., University of California, Los Angeles. Google Scholar
  99. Zoll, Cheryl. 1997. Conflicting directionality. Phonology 14: 263–286. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Zoll, Cheryl. 1998a. Parsing below the segment in a constraint-based framework. Stanford: CLSI Publications. Google Scholar
  101. Zoll, Cheryl. 1998b. Positional asymmetries and licensing. Ms., MIT ROA-282, Rutgers Optimality Archive. http://roa.rutgers.edu.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of LinguisticsLanguages and Communication BLDGSalt Lake CityUSA

Personalised recommendations