Abstract
This paper argues that Hindi incorporation is, in fact, pseudo-incorporation, involving noun phrases rather than nouns. Furthermore, it shows that there is no requirement that the incorporated nominal surface as a morphological or even a syntactic unit with the verb. Such loosely aligned nominals can nevertheless be identified as incorporation on the basis of semantic intuitions having to do with number interpretation, anaphora, and certain properties typically associated with lexical processes. Contrary to standard assumptions, it is argued that the target of pseudo-incorporation is specified for number. Singular incorporated nominals in Hindi are shown to be semantically singular, with number neutrality arising as a consequence of interaction with aspectual operators. Taking aspectual information into account is also shown to have interesting implications for current approaches to the semantics of incorporation, one in which the incorporated nominal introduces a discourse referent, and one in which it functions as a predicate modifier. A closer look at the effect of aspect on anaphora, for example, does not unequivocally support the predicate modification view of pseudo-incorporation. The paper draws on data from Hungarian, and to some extent Danish, to explore the cross-linguistic applicability of the claims made on the basis of Hindi. Most notably, a distinction between Hungarian verbs with respect to incorporation of bare singulars provides striking confirmation of the claim that number morphology is semantically visible in pseudo-incorporation. It also addresses restrictions on the productivity of pseudo-incorporation in light of the proposed analysis of pseudo-incorporation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Asudeh, Ash, and Line Hove Mikkelsen. 2000. Incorporation in Danish: Implications for interfaces. In A collection of papers on head-driven phrase structure grammar, eds. Ronnie Cann, Claire Grover, and Philip Miller, 1–15. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Baker, Mark. 1996. The polysynthesis parameter. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bhatt, Rajesh. 2005. Long distance agreement in Hindi-Urdu. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 23: 757–807.
Bittner, Maria. 1994. Case, scope and binding. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Butt, Miriam. 1993. Object specificity and agreement in Hindi/Urdu. In Proceedings of CLS 29, eds. Katharine Beals et al., 89–103. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Carlson, Gregory. 1977. Reference to kinds in English. PhD Dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Chierchia, Gennaro. 1992. Anaphora and dynamic binding. Linguistics and Philosophy 15: 111–183.
Chierchia, Gennaro. 1998. Reference to kinds across languages. Natural Language Semantics 6: 339–405.
Chung, Sandra, and William Ladusaw. 2003. Restriction and saturation. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Cusic, David. 1981. Verbal plurality and aspect. PhD dissertation, Stanford University.
Dayal, Veneeta. 1999. Bare NPs, reference to kinds and incorporation. In Proceedings of semantics and linguistics theory 9, eds. Tanya Matthews and Devon Strolovitch, 35–51. Ithaca: CLC Publications.
Dayal, Veneeta. 2003. Bare nominals: Non-specific and contrastive readings under scrambling. In Word order and scrambling, ed. Simin Karimi, 67–90. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Dayal, Veneeta. 2004. Number marking and (in)definiteness in Kind Terms. Linguistics and Philosophy 27: 393–450.
de Hoop, Helen. 1992. Case configuration and noun phrase interpretation. PhD thesis, University of Groningen, Groningen.
Deo, Ashwini. 2006. Tense and aspect in Indo-Aryan languages: Variation and diachrony. PhD thesis, Stanford University.
Diesing, Molly. 1992. Indefinites. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Dowty, David. 1979. Word meaning and montague grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Elbourne, Paul. 2001. E-type anaphora as NP-deletion. Natural Language Semantics 9: 241–288.
Enç, Mürvet. 1986. Tense without scope: An analysis of nouns as indexicals. PhD dissertation, University of Southern California.
Enç, Mürvet. 1991. The semantics of specificity. Linguistic Inquiry 22: 1–25.
Farkas, Donka, and Henriette de Swart. 2003. The semantics of incorporation: From argument structure to discourse transparency. Palo Alto: CSLI.
Gambhir, Vijay. 1981. Syntactic restrictions and discourse functions of word order in standard Hindi. PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
Heim, Irene. 1990. E-type pronouns and donkey anaphora. Linguistics and Philosophy 13: 137–177.
Hook, Peter Edwin. 1979. Hindi structures: Intermediate level. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Center for South and Southeast Studies.
Krifka, Manfred. 1989. Nominal reference, temporal constitution and quantification in event semantics. In Semantics and contextual expressions, eds. Renate Bartsch, Johan van Benthem, and Peter van Emde Boas, 75–111. Dordrecht: Foris.
Krifka, Manfred. 1998. The origins of telicity. In Events and grammar, ed. Susan Rothstein, 197–235. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Krifka, Manfred, Francis J. Pelletier, Gregory Carlson, Alice ter Meulen, Gennaro Chierchia, and Godehard Link. 1995. In genericity: An introduction. In The generic book, eds. Gregory Carlson and Francis J. Pelletier, 1–124. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Lasersohn, Peter. 1995. Plurality, conjunction and events. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Levin, Beith. 1993. English verb classes and alternations: A preliminary investigation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Mahajan, Anoop. 1992. The specificity condition and the CED. Linguistic Inquiry 23: 510–516.
Massam, Diane. 2001. Pseudo noun incorporation in Niuean. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 19: 153–197.
Medin, Douglas, and Cynthia Aguilar. 1999. Categorization. In The MIT encyclopedia of the cognitive sciences, eds. Robert Wilson and Frank Keil, 104–106. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Mithun, Marianne. 1984. The evolution of noun incorporation. Language 60: 847–894.
Mithun, Marianne. 1986. On the nature of noun incorporation. Language 62: 32–38.
Mohanan, Tara. 1995. Wordhood and lexicality. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 13: 75–134.
Öztürk, Balkiz. 2003. Pseudo incorporation in Turkish. Harvard Working Papers in Linguistics 8: 139–158.
Porterfield, Leslie, and Veneeta Srivastav. 1988. (In)definiteness in the absence of articles: Evidence from Hindi and Indonesian. In Proceedings of the west coast conference on formal linguistics, ed. Hagit Borer, 265–276. Somerville: Casadilla Press.
Postal, Paul. 1969. Anaphoric islands. Chicago Linguistic Society 5: 205–239.
Pustejovsky, James. 1991. The generative lexicon. Computational Linguistics 17: 409–441.
Sadock, Jerrold. 1980. Noun incorporation in Greenlandic: A case of syntactic word formation. Language 56: 309–319.
Sadock, Jerrold. 1986. Some notes on noun incorporation. Language 62: 19–31.
Stump, Gregory. 1981. The interpretation of frequency adjectives. Linguistics and Philosophy 4: 629–660.
Stvan, Laurel. 1998. The semantics and pragmatics of bare singular noun phrases. PhD dissertation, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois.
Van Geenhoven, Veerle. 1998. Semantic incorporation and indefinite descriptions. Palo Alto: CSLI.
Van Geenhoven, Veerle. 2004. For-adverbials, frequentative aspect and pluractionality. Natural Language Semantics 12: 135–190.
Verma, Manindra K. 1966. The noun phrase in Hindi and English. New Delhi: Motilal.
Wescoat, Michael. 2002. On lexical sharing. PhD Thesis, Stanford University.
Yanovich, Igor. 2007. Incorporated nominals as antecedents for anaphora, or how to save the thematic arguments theory. In Proceedings of the 31st Penn linguistic colloquium, eds. Joshua Tauberer, Aviad Eilam, and Laurel MacKenzie, 267–280.
Zucchi, Alessandro, and Michael White. 2001. Twigs, sequences, and the temporal constitution of predicates. Linguistics and Philosophy 24: 223–270.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dayal, V. Hindi pseudo-incorporation. Nat Lang Linguist Theory 29, 123–167 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-011-9118-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-011-9118-4