Skip to main content
Log in

Language recognition power and succinctness of affine automata

  • Published:
Natural Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this work we study a non-linear generalization based on affine transformations of probabilistic and quantum automata proposed recently by Díaz-Caro and Yakaryılmaz (in: Computer science—theory and applications, LNCS, vol 9691. Springer, pp 1–15, 2016. ArXiv:1602.04732) referred to as affine automata. First, we present efficient simulations of probabilistic and quantum automata by means of affine automata which characterizes the class of exclusive stochastic languages. Then we initiate a study on the succintness of affine automata. In particular, we show that an infinite family of unary regular languages can be recognized by 2-state affine automata, whereas the number of inner states of quantum and probabilistic automata cannot be bounded. Finally, we present a characterization of all (regular) unary languages recognized by two-state affine automata.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. This way of scanning an input tape is sometimes referred to as “strict realtime”.

  2. A superoperator or quantum operator is a positive-semidefinite operation that maps density matrices to density matrices (Say and Yakaryılmaz 2014; Ambainis and Yakaryılmaz 2015).

  3. Pures states are vectors in a complex Hilbert space normalized with respect to the \(\ell _2\)-norm.

  4. A promise problem \(\mathtt L=(L_{yes},L_{no})\) is solved by a machine M, or M solves \(\mathtt L\), if for all \(w \in \mathtt L_{yes}, M\) accepts w, and for all \(w \in \mathtt L_{no}, M\) rejects w.

References

  • Ablayev FM, Gainutdinova A, Khadiev K, Yakaryılmaz A (2014) Very narrow quantum OBDDs and width hierarchies for classical OBDDs. In: Descriptional complexity of formal systems, LNCS, vol 8614. Springer, pp 53–64

  • Ambainis A, Freivalds R (1998) 1-way quantum finite automata: strengths, weaknesses and generalizations. In: FOCS’98. pp 332–341. ArXiv:9802062

  • Ambainis A, Yakaryılmaz A (2012) Superiority of exact quantum automata for promise problems. Inf Process Lett 112(7):289–291

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ambainis A, Yakaryılmaz A (2015) Automata and quantum computing. Tech. Rep. ArXiv:1507.01988

  • Belovs A, Montoya J A, Yakaryılmaz A (2016) Can one quantum bit separate any pair of words with zero-error? Tech. Rep. ArXiv:1602.07967

  • Díaz-Caro A, Yakaryılmaz A (2016) Affine computation and affine automaton. In: Computer science—theory and applications, LNCS, vol 9691. Springer, pp 1–15. ArXiv:1602.04732

  • Freivalds R, Karpinski M (1994) Lower space bounds for randomized computation. In: ICALP’94. pp 580–592

  • Gainutdinova A, Yakaryılmaz A (2015) Unary probabilistic and quantum automata on promise problems. In: Developments in language theory, LNCS, vol 9168. Springer, pp 252–263

  • Geffert V, Yakaryılmaz A (2015) Classical automata on promise problems. Discrete Math Theor Comput Sci 17(2):157–180

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gruska J, Qiu D, Zheng S (2015) Potential of quantum finite automata with exact acceptance. Int J Found Comput Sci 26(3):381–398

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hirvensalo M (2010) Quantum automata with open time evolution. Int J Nat Comput 1(1):70–85

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hirvensalo M, Moutot E, Yakaryılmaz A (2017) On the computational power of affine automata. Lang Automat Theory Appl Lect Notes Comput Sci 10168:405–417

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ibrahimov R, Khadiev K, Prūsis K, Yakaryılmaz A (2017) Zero-error affine, unitary, and probabilistic OBDDs. Tech. Rep. ArXiv:1703.07184

  • Kupferman O, Ta-Shma A, Vardi M Y (1999) Counting with automata. In: Short paper presented at the 15th annual IEEE symposium on logic in computer science (LICS 2000)

  • Li L, Qiu D, Zou X, Li L, Wu L, Mateus P (2012) Characterizations of one-way general quantum finite automata. Theor Comput Sci 419:73–91

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Macarie II (1998) Space-efficient deterministic simulation of probabilistic automata. SIAM J Comput 27(2):448–465

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Moore C, Crutchfield JP (2000) Quantum automata and quantum grammars. Theor Comput Sci 237(1–2):275–306

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Nakanishi M, Khadiev K, Prūsis K, Vihrovs J, Yakaryılmaz A (2017) Affine counter automata. In: Proceedings 15th international conference on automata and formal languages, EPTCS, vol 252. pp 205–218

  • Paz A (1971) Introduction to probabilistic automata. Academic Press, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rabin M, Scott D (1959) Finite automata and their decision problems. IBM J Res Dev 3:114–125

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rabin MO (1963) Probabilistic automata. Inf Control 6:230–243

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rashid J, Yakaryılmaz A (2014) Implications of quantum automata for contextuality. In: Implementation and application of automata, LNCS, vol 8587. Springer, pp 318–331. ArXiv:1404.2761

  • Say ACC, Yakaryılmaz A (2014) Quantum finite automata: A modern introduction. In: Computing with new resources, LNCS, vol 8808. Springer, pp 208–222

  • Shur AM, Yakaryılmaz A (2016) More on quantum, stochastic, and pseudo stochastic languages with few states. Nat Comput 15(1):129–141

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Turakainenn P (1975) Word-functions of stochastic and pseudo stochastic automata. Ann Acad Sci Fenn Ser A I Math 1:27–37

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Villagra M, Yakaryılmaz A (2016) Language recognition power and succintness of affine automata. In: Unconventional computation and natural computation, LNCS, vol. 9726. Springer, pp 116–129

  • Yakaryılmaz A, Say ACC (2009) Languages recognized with unbounded error by quantum finite automata. In: Computer science—theory and applications, LNCS, vol 5675. Springer, pp 356–367

  • Yakaryılmaz A, Say ACC (2010) Languages recognized by nondeterministic quantum finite automata. Quantum Inf Comput 10(9&10):747–770

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Yakaryılmaz A, Say ACC (2010) Succinctness of two-way probabilistic and quantum finite automata. Discrete Math Theor Comput Sci 12(2):19–40

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Yakaryılmaz A, Say ACC (2011) Unbounded-error quantum computation with small space bounds. Inf Comput 279(6):873–892

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank to the anonymous referees for their helpful comments. Yakaryılmaz was partially supported by CAPES with Grant 88881.030338/2013-01 and ERC Advanced Grant MQC.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcos Villagra.

Additional information

An earlier version of this paper appeared as “Villagra, M., Yakaryılmaz, A.: Language recognition power and succinctness of affine automata. In: Unconventional Computation and Natural Computation, LNCS, vol. 9726, pp. 116–129. Springer (2016)”. The current paper has augmented this original work by presenting full details of all proofs. Some parts of this work was done while Yakaryılmaz was visiting Universidad Nacional de Asunción in September 2015.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Villagra, M., Yakaryılmaz, A. Language recognition power and succinctness of affine automata. Nat Comput 17, 283–293 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11047-017-9652-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11047-017-9652-z

Keywords

Navigation