Natural Computing

, Volume 14, Issue 4, pp 555–566 | Cite as

Minimization and equivalence in multi-valued logical models of regulatory networks

Article

Abstract

Multi-valued logical models can be used to describe biological networks on a high level of abstraction based on the network structure and logical parameters capturing regulatory effects. Interestingly, the dynamics of two distinct models need not necessarily be different, which might hint at either only non-functional characteristics distinguishing the models or at different possible implementations for the same behaviour. Here, we study the conditions allowing for such effects by analysing classes of dynamically equivalent models and both structurally maximal and minimal representatives of such classes. Finally, we present an efficient algorithm that constructs a minimal representative of the respective class of a given multi-valued model.

Keywords

Regulatory networks Multi-valued models Minimization Equivalence Transition system 

References

  1. Bloniarz PA, Hunt HB III, Rosenkrantz DJ (1984) Algebraic structures with hard equivalence and minimization problems. J ACM 31(4):879–904MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Dennunzio A, Formenti E, Provillard J (2012) Non-uniform cellular automata: classes, dynamics, and decidability. Inf Comput 215:32–46MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Gallet E, Manceny M, Le Gall P, Ballarini P (2014) An LTL model checking approach for biological parameter inference. In: Merz S, Pang J (eds) Formal methods and software engineering, lecture notes in computer science, vol 8829, Springer International Publishing, pp 155–170Google Scholar
  4. Gershenson C (2004) Introduction to random Boolean networks. arXiv:nlin/0408006
  5. Kauffman S (1969) Metabolic stability and epigenesis in randomly constructed genetic nets. J Theor Biol 22(3):437–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Klarner H, Streck A, Šafránek D, Kolčák J, Siebert H (2012) Parameter identification and model ranking of Thomas networks. In: Gilbert D, Heiner M (eds) Computational methods for systems biology, lecture notes in computer science, vol 7605, Springer, Heidelberg, pp 207–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Naldi A, Remy E, Thieffry D, Chaouiya C (2011) Dynamically consistent reduction of logical regulatory graphs. Theor Comput Sci 412(21):2207–2218MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Siebert H (2008) Local structure and behavior of Boolean bioregulatory networks. In: Horimoto K, Regensburger G, Rosenkranz M, Yoshida H (eds) Algebraic biology, lecture notes in computer science, vol 5147, Springer, Heidelberg, pp 185–199Google Scholar
  9. Streck A, Siebert H (2014) Equivalences in multi-valued asynchronous models of regulatory networks. In: Wąs J, Sirakoulis GC, Bandini S (eds) Cellular automata, lecture notes in computer science, vol 8751, Springer International Publishing, pp 571–575Google Scholar
  10. Thomas R (1991) Regulatory networks seen as asynchronous automata: a logical description. J Theor Biol 153(1):1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Thomas R (2013) Remarks on the respective roles of logical parameters and time delays in asynchronous logic: an homage to El Houssine Snoussi. Bull Math Biol 75(6):896–904MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mathematics and Computer ScienceFreie Universität BerlinBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations