Skip to main content
Log in

Sorting of neural spikes: When wavelet based methods outperform principal component analysis

  • Published:
Natural Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sorting of the extracellularly recorded spikes is a basic prerequisite for analysis of the cooperative neural behavior and neural code. Fundamentally the sorting performance is defined by the quality of discriminative features extracted from spike waveforms. Here we discuss two features extraction approaches: principal component analysis (PCA), and wavelet transform (WT). We show that only when properly tuned to the data, the WT technique may outperform PCA. We present a novel method for extraction of spike features based on a combination of PCA and continuous WT. The method automatically tunes its WT part to the data structure making use of knowledge obtained by PCA. We demonstrate the method on simulated and experimental data sets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

PCA:

principal component analysis

WF:

wave form

WSAC:

wavelet shape-accounting classifier

WSPC:

wavelet-classifier with superparamagnetic clustering

WSC:

wavelet-based spike classifier

WT:

wavelet transform

References

  • Acharya T and Ray AK (2005) Image Processing: Principles and Applications. Wiley

  • Blatt M, Wiseman S, Domany E (1996) Superparamagnetic clustering of data. Physical Review Letters 76: 3251–3254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buzsaki G (2004) Large-scale recording of neuronal ensembles. Nature Neuroscience 7(5): 446–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downs GM, Barnard JM (2002) Clustering methods and their uses in computational chemistry. Reviews in Computational Chemistry 18:1–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris KD, Henze DA, Csicsvari J, Hirase H, Buzsaki G (2000) Accuracy of tetrode spike separation as determined by simultaneous intracellular and extracellular measurements. Journal of Neurophysiology 84: 401–414

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulata E, Segev R, Ben-Jacob E (2002) A method for spike sorting and detection based on wavelet packets and Shannon’s mutual information. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 117:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman L and Rousseeuw PJ (1990) Finding Groups in Data: An Introduction to Cluster Analysis. Wiley-Interscience

  • Letelier J, Weber P (2000) Spike sorting based on discrete wavelet transform coefficients. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 101:93–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewicki M (1998) A review of methods for spike sorting: the detection and classification of neural action potentials. Network: Computational Neural Systems 9: R53–78

  • Quian Quiroga R, Nadasdy Z, Ben-Shaul Y (2004) Unsupervised spike detection and sorting with wavelets and superparamagnetic clustering. Neural Computation 16: 1661–1687

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Shoham S, Fellows MR, Normann RA (2003) Robust, automatic spike sorting using mixtures of multivariate t-distributions. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 127: 111–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler B (1999) Automatic Discrimination of Single Units. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work has been supported in part by the European Union under ROSANA project (EU-IST-2001-34892), by a project from Universidad Complutense (PR1/06-14482-B), by the Spanish Ministry of Education and Science under the program Ramon y Cajal, and by the program BRHE from CRDF and RF Ministry of Education and Science (grant Y1-P-06-06).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Valeri A. Makarov.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pavlov, A., Makarov, V.A., Makarova, I. et al. Sorting of neural spikes: When wavelet based methods outperform principal component analysis. Nat Comput 6, 269–281 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11047-006-9014-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11047-006-9014-8

Keywords

Navigation