Our phylogenetic analysis showed that seventy-four clinical isolates originated in Northeast China were entirely clustered with S. globosa. Moreover, these isolates were divided into two highly supported sub-clades (S. globosa I and S. globosa II). S. globosa I grouped sixty-eight Chinese clinical isolates, three previously published Chinese environmental isolates (AM399002, AM399005, and AM399004), the type strain of S. globosa (AM116908 from Spain), and some isolates from the USA (AM399015), India (AM490358), Japan (AM398994), Brazil (GU456632), UK (AM490354), while S. globosa II included six Chinese clinical isolates and the isolate from Italy (AM399018). S. globosa I was significantly more frequent than S. globosa II. The division of S. globosa was not related to geography, since the main clade of our clinical isolates, S. globosa I was more closely related to isolates from USA, Japan, and Brazil than to the other Chinese clinical isolates of S. globosa II. Sixty-eight Chinese clinical isolates were closely related to AM399002, AM399004, and AM399005, which were isolated from environment of Northeast China by Ishizaki and Xuezhu Jin [15]. Among them, AM399002 was from cornstalks, while AM399004 was from reed leaves and AM399005 was from soil [15], which indicated that most clinical isolates in Northeast China originated from autochthonous environment. Only six isolates were related to AM399018, which was isolated from Italy by Viviani in 1986 [16]. This suggested that a small amount of isolates in Northeast China were allochthonous. There was no association between the clinical form of sporotrichosis and the division of S. globosa. The origins of S. globosa I isolates in this study were fixed cutaneous (n = 29), lymphocutaneous (n = 36), and disseminated cutaneous (n = 3). S. globosa II isolates in this study were from fixed cutaneous (n = 3) and lymphocutaneous (n = 3) cases.
Although these clinical isolates were divided into two groups, they showed the same morphological and physiological features. They produced not only obovoidal, hyaline, sympodial conidia but also globose to subglobose, pigmented, sessile conidia. They were able to assimilate sucrose and unable to assimilate raffinose. The colonies of these isolates when grown on PDA attained a diameter of 25–45 mm at 30 °C in 21 days (not exceeding 50 mm). According to the Marimon’s key phenotypic features for species differentiation [1], the aforementioned phenotypic aspects are characteristic of S. globosa. However, we also noticed an important discrepancy with the results reported by Marimon et al. [1] with regard to the ability of S. globosa isolates to grow at 37 °C. Marimon et al. proposed S. globosa did not present growth at 37 °C. By contrast, most of our S. globosa isolates presented growth at 37 °C, attaining 9 mm of colony diameter on PDA at 37 °C in 21 days. Nevertheless, Marimon et al. related four exceptions, which exhibited very restricted growth (up to 2 mm in diameter in 21 days). Moreover, the first S. globosa isolate in Brazil identified by Oliveira et al. [5] also presented growth at 37 °C, attaining 7 mm of colony diameter. Consequently, disagreement in thermotolerance suggested that there may be some variation within this species. It seemed that the capacity for growth at 37 °C was not helpful for species differentiation. The reason for the difference in diameter at 37 °C may be that we inoculated 10 μl of conidial suspension, while both Marimon and Oliveira inoculated pieces of the fungus that were approximately 1 mm in diameter. In addition, Kwon-Chung [17] discovered that strains causing fixed cutaneous sporotrichosis grow best at 35 °C, while those causing lymphocutaneous form grow at both 37 and 35 °C. However, in our study, the isolates which were thermotolerant at 37 °C could be obtained from fixed cutaneous, lymphocutaneous, or disseminated sporotrichosis. Our observations were similar to those of Mehta et al. [18] who observed that isolates from both fixed and lymphocutaneous types grew well at 37 °C. These phenomena further hinted that difference in thermotolerance may be related to individual variation.
Based on the phenotypic and genetic analysis, we found that all clinical isolates studied belonged to the same species, i.e., S. globosa, independent of geographical regions and clinical forms of sporotrichosis, which suggested it was not Sporothrix species that determined types of clinical presentation. Our previous studies [19] showed that the isolate (Sp98-12-1, i.e. DMU1) from disseminated sporotrichosis presented 10-bp deletion in the ribosomal nontranscribed spacer (NTS) region and higher virulence compared to the isolate (D1, i.e. DMU15) from fixed sporotrichosis, which further suggested from the gene level that there may be some variation within this species. It appears that the strain variation in genotypes and virulence as well as immune status of the host may contribute to disseminated type of sporotrichosis. We also drew a conclusion that outbreaks of sporotrichosis in Jilin province over the past 2 years were caused by the same species as the sporadic cases in Heilongjiang and Liaoning provinces, which could be explained by the fact that in Northeast China, wide contact with contaminated cornstalks led to high incidence. The people living in rural areas accounted for a considerable proportion of sporotrichosis patients, who were used to stacking cornstalks for use in cooking or heating. Isolation of S. schenckii from cornstalks of Northeast China has been reported [15], which proves to be S. globosa now [1]. Over time, fungal growth on this material increases as the cornstalks decay and become the source of contamination. Outbreaks might be associated with increased chances of contact in autumn and winter or increased Sporothrix quantity in the environment, which was also confirmed by our results that most clinical isolates were clustered with Chinese environmental isolates.