Skip to main content
Log in

Structure of optimized generalized coordinates partitioned vectors for holonomic and non-holonomic systems

  • Published:
Multibody System Dynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The generalized coordinates partitioning is a well-known procedure that can be applied in the framework of a numerical integration of the DAE systems. However, although the procedure proves to be a very useful tool, it is known that an optimization algorithm for the coordinates partitioning is needed to obtain the best performance. In the paper, the optimized partitioning of the generalized coordinates is revisited in the context of a numerical forward dynamics of the holonomic and non-holonomic multibody systems. After a short presentation of the geometric background of the optimized coordinates partitioning, a structure of the optimally partitioned vectors is discussed on the basis of a gradient analysis of the separate constraint sub-manifolds at the configuration and the velocity levels when holonomic and non-holonomic constraints are present in the system. It is shown that, for holonomic systems, the vectors of optimally partitioned coordinates have the same structure for the generalized positions and velocities. On the contrary, in the case of non-holonomic systems, the optimally partitioned coordinates generally differ at the configuration and the velocity levels. The conclusions of the paper are illustrated within the framework of the presented numerical example.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wehage, R.A., Haug, E.J.: Generalized coordinate partitioning for dimension reduction in analysis of constrained dynamic systems. J. Mech. Des. 104, 247–255 (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Nikravesh, P.E.: Computer-Aided Analysis of Mechanical Systems. Prentice Hall, New York (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Haug, E.J.: Computer Aided Kinematics and Dynamics of Mechanical Systems: Basic Methods. Prentice Hall, New York (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Schiehlen, W.: Multibody system dynamics: roots and perspectives. Multibody Syst. Dyn. 1, 149–188 (1997)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Terze, Z., Lefeber, D., Muftić, O.: Null space integration method for constrained multibody system simulation with no constraint violation. Multibody Syst. Dyn. 6, 229–243 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Terze, Z., Naudet, J.: Geometric properties of projective constraint violation stabilization method for generally constrained multibody systems on manifolds. Multibody Syst. Dyn. 20, 85–106 (2008)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Blajer, W., Schiehlen, W., Schirm, W.: A projective criterion to the coordinate partitioning method for multibody dynamics. Arch. Appl. Mech. 64, 86–98 (1994)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Blajer, W.: Elimination of constraint violation and accuracy aspects in numerical simulation of multibody systems. Multibody Syst. Dyn. 7(3), 265–284 (2002)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Marsden, J.E., Ratiu, T.S.: Introduction to Mechanics and Symmetry. Springer, New York (1999)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Arnold, V.I.: Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics. Springer, New York (1978)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Bullo, F., Lewis, A.D.: Geometric Control of Mechanical Systems. Springer, New York (2005)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Shutz, B.F.: Geometrical Methods of Mathematical Physics. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jungnickel, U.: Differential-algebraic equations in Riemannian spaces and applications to multibody system dynamics. ZAMM 74, 409–415 (1994)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Blajer, W.: A geometric unification of constrained system dynamics. Multibody Syst. Dyn. 1, 3–21 (1997)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. de Jalon, J.G., Bayo, E.: Kinematic and Dynamic Simulation of Multibody Systems: The Real-Time Challenge. Springer, New York (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Terze, Z., Müller, A.: Lie group modeling and forward dynamics simulation of multibody systems, part 2: dynamics and time integration. Trans. FAMENA 33(3), 1–14 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Nikravesh, P.E.: Initial condition correction in multibody dynamics. Multibody Syst. Dyn. 18, 107–115 (2007)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zdravko Terze.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Terze, Z., Naudet, J. Structure of optimized generalized coordinates partitioned vectors for holonomic and non-holonomic systems. Multibody Syst Dyn 24, 203–218 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11044-010-9195-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11044-010-9195-x

Keywords

Navigation