Skip to main content
Log in

Tractable Treatment of Design by Multiobjective Optimization – Parallel Kinematics Case Study

  • Published:
Multibody System Dynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The majority of engineering designs can be described as configuration design. The solution of configuration design is not only the satisfaction of constraints and requirements, but the solution requires the optimized variant. However, there are usually multiple objectives and corresponding design problem in a multiobjective one. Even for relatively small problems the solution space is large and the computational complexity can be very high with exponential growth. Another problem of configuration design is the usual nonlinear and non-monotonic character of engineering design. The efficient computation of multiobjective global optimisation is a powerful general way for solving the nonlinearity and non-monotonicity of design problems.

The paper deals with two issues: (1) the description of general approaches how to reduce this computational complexity and thus to realize tractable treatment of such design and (2) the description of application of this approach for design of parallel kinematics machines. The described general approaches for the reduction of computational complexity are the decomposition of design space into hierarchy of subspaces, the development of computational tools for global evaluation of mechanical properties and usage of global optimization tools that enable efficiently to find admissible solutions and to reconstruct the Pareto sets.

This general approach has been successfully applied for design methodology of parallel kinematics machines. Parallel kinematics machine means a platform with actuator (gripper for manipulation in robotics, cutting tool for machining in machine tools) that is suspended on several kinematic chains in parallel. The developed design methodology has been successfully used for the industrial design of the new horizontal machine tool TRIJOINT 900H with significantly improved mechanical properties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stefik, M., Introduction to Knowledge Systems Morgan Kaufman Publishers, 1995.

  2. Tansley, D.S.W. and Hayball, C.C., Knowledge-Based Systems Analysis and Design Prentice Hall, Hemel Hempstead, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Motta, E. and Zdrahal, Z., Parametric Design Problem Solving, KAW 96. Banff, Canada, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Zdrahal, Z. and Motta, E., ‘An in-depth analysis of propose & revise problem solving methods’, in Proceedings of the 9th KAW 95, Banff Canada, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Zdrahal, Z. and Valasek, M., ‘Modelling tasks in engineering design’, Cybernetics and Systems 27(2), 1996, 105–117.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Valasek, M., ‘Mechatronic system design methodology - initial principles based on case studies’, in Mechatronics 98, Adolfsson, J. and Karlsen, J. (eds.), Pergamon Press, Amsterdam, 1998, pp. 501–506.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Valasek, M. and Stefan, M., ‘Knowledge-based approach for concurrent engineering’, in Proceedings of 4th International Conference on Knowledge-Based Intelligent Engineering Systems KES 2000, Brighton 2000, Vol. 1, pp. 125–128.

  8. Valasek, M. and Stefan, M., ‘Concurrent engineering design based on sensitivity analysis of design network’, in Proceedings of Advanced Engineering Design Conference AED 03, CTU in Prague, Prague 2003, p. 244, CD-ROM.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Stefan, M., ‘Automatic fix rating for parametric design knowledge model’, in Proceedings of Summer Workshop of Applied Mechanics 2003, CTU in Prague, Prague 2003, CD-ROM.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tesar, D. et al., ‘A generalized modular architecture for robot structures’, Manuf. Review 2(2), 1989, 91–118.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Neue Maschinenkonzepte mit parallelen Strukturen fuer Handhabung und Produktion, VDI Berichte 1427, Braunschweig 1998.

  12. Neugebauer, R. (ed.), Development Methods and Application Experience of Parallel Kinematics, PKS 2002, IWU FhG, Chemnitz, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Šika, Z., Valášek, M., Miláček, S., and Bastl, P., ‘Synthesis and analysis of planar redundant parallel robot’, in Proceedings of NATO ASI Computational Methods in Mechanisms, Angeles, J. and Zakhariev, E. (eds.), Varna, 1997, Vol. II, pp. 353–362.

  14. Val’šek, M. and Sika, Z., ‘Redundantly actuated parallel kinematics – New concept for machine tools’, in Proceedings of 1st IFAC-Conference on Mechatronic Systems, Darmstadt, 2000, pp. 241–246.

  15. Valasek, M., Bauma, V., Sika, Z. and Vampola, T., ‘Redundant parallel robots-new perspectives, mechatronics design and control challenges’, in Advanced Driving Systems, Chemnitz: 2002, p. 292–301.

  16. Sika, Z., Valasek, M., Bauma, V., and Vampola, T., ‘Design of redundant parallel robots by multidisciplinary virtual modelling’, in Virtual Nonlinear Multibody Systems, NATO Advanced Study Institute, Prague: CTU, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, 2002, Vol. 2, pp. 177–182.

  17. Valasek, M. and Sika, Z., ‘Pareto set determination and manipulation from multiobjective optimization’, in Proceedings of Advanced Engineering Design Conference AED 03, CTU in Prague, Prague 2003, p. 185, CD-ROM.

  18. Valasek, M., Cizek, V. and Petru, F., ‘Increased innovation potential by concurrent engineering design methodology – a case study at kovosvit’, in 3rd International Conference on Integrated Engineering Approach in Enterprise Management, Prague: CTU, 2002, pp. 111–115.

  19. www.trijoint.com.

  20. Valasek, M., Petru, F., Sika, Z., Bauma, V. and Vampola, T.: Parallel positioning mechanism, especialy for machining and/or manipulation a and/or measurement, Patent pending PV 2001–2214, Prague 2001.

  21. Salisbury, J.K. and Craig, J., ‘Articulated hands: Force control and kinematic issues’, International Journal of Robotics Research, 1(1), 1982, pp. 4–17.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gosselin, C.M., ‘On the design of efficient parallel mechanisms’, in Computational Methods in Mechanical Systems, NATO ASI Series F, Vol. 161 Springer Verlag, Berlin 1998, pp. 68–96.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Val’šek, M. and Šika, Z., ‘Evaluation of dynamic capabilities of machines and robots’, Multibody System Dynamics 5, 2001, 183–202.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Stejskal, V. and Val’šek, M., Kinematics and Dynamics of Machinery, Marcel Dekker, New York 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Val’šek, M., Šika, Z. and Bauma, V., ‘Kinematic accuracy of redundant parallel robots’, in Mechatronics and Robotics 99, VUT Brno 1999, pp. 197–202.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Val’šek, M., Breedveld, P., Šika, Z. and Vampola, T., Software tools for mechatronic vehicles: Design through modelling and simulation, Vehicle System Dynamics 33(Suppl), 2000, 214–230.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Houck, C., Joines, J. and Kay, M., A Genetic Algorithm for Function Optimization: A Matlab Implementation, NCSU-IE TR 95-09, 1995, http://www.eos.ncsu.edu/eos/service/ie/research/kay_res/GAToolBox/gaot.

  28. Haug, E.J., Adkins, F.A. and Luh, Ch.M., ‘Numerical methods for mechanism and manipulator workspace analysis’, in Computational Methods in Mechanical Systems, Angeles, J. and Zakhariev, E. (eds.), NATO ASI Series F, Vol. 161, Springer Verlag, Berlin 1998, pp. 144–163.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Valasek.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Valasek, M., Sika, Z., Bauma, V. et al. Tractable Treatment of Design by Multiobjective Optimization – Parallel Kinematics Case Study. Multibody Syst Dyn 13, 143–174 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11044-005-4082-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11044-005-4082-6

Keywords

Navigation