Abstract
The design process of road vehicles, very often based on intuition and experience, can be greatly enhanced through the use of generalized optimization techniques. A methodology based on the use flexible multibody models for the ride and stability optimization of vehicles is proposed here. This procedure allows the use of complex shaped deformable bodies, represented by finite elements, while the gross rigid body motion is captured using co-rotational frames. Rigid bodies represent almost undeformable system components. The methodology proposed is exemplified through the application to a road vehicle with flexible chassis, described as a flexible multibody system. The vehicle optimum design is achieved through the use of an algorithm with finite differences sensitivities, included in a general-purpose package. The vehicle components characteristics are the design variables while constraints on their relative motion and limiting values are imposed. The major difference between the analysis models used for vehicle ride and for handling lies in the description of the tires and road. For comfort improvement the road model is profiled, i.e., it simply contains the information on its height for the left and right side of the wheel sets independently. No lateral forces are specified for the tire road interaction and the tire model only includes the radial deformations. The handling analysis of the vehicle dynamics requires that a three-dimensional description of the road is provided and that the tire model can handle lateral forces. The ride optimization is achieved by finding the optimum of a ride index that is the outcome of a metric that accounts for the acceleration measured in several key points of the vehicle, weighted according to its importance to the occupant comfort. Simulations with various vehicle speeds and different road profiles and geometries, accounting for diverse ride and handling conditions, are used to exemplify applications of the proposed methods.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Shabana, A., Dynamic Analysis of Large-Scale Inertia Variant Flexible Systems, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Iowa, 1982.
Geradin, M., Cardona, A., Doan, D.B. and Duysens, J., ‘Finite element modeling concepts in multibody dynamics,’ in Computer Aided Analysis of Rigid and Flexible Multibody Systems, M.S. Pereira and J.A.C. Ambrosio (eds.), Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1994, 233–284.
Ambrósio, J. and Gonçalves, J., ‘Complex flexible multibody systems with application to vehicle dynamics.’ Multibody System Dynamics 6(2), 2001, 163–182.
Shabana, A. and Wehage, R., ‘A coordinate reduction technique for transient analysis of spatial structures with large angular rotations.’ Journal of Structural Mechanics 11(3), 1983, 401–431.
Ambrósio, J. and Ravn, P., ‘Elastodynamics of multibody systems using generalized inertial coordinates and structural damping.’ Mechanics Structure and Machines 25(2), 1997, 201–219.
Ambrósio, J. and Gonçalves, J., ‘Advanced modelling of flexible multibody systems using virtual bodies.’ Computer Assisted Mechanics and Engineering Sciences 9(3), 2002, 373–390.
Crowe, K., Yuan-An, J.F., Neaderhouser, D. and Smith, P. A Direct Sparse Linear Equation Solver Using Linked List Storage. IMSL Technical Report 9006, IMSL, Houston, 1990.
Duff, A.M. Erisman and Reid, J.K. Direct Methods for Sparse Matrices, Clarendon Press, Oxford, MA, 1986.
Haug, E. and Arora, J., Applied Optimal Design: Mechanical and Structural Systems, Wiley, New York, 1979.
Chang, P.N., ‘Optimal design of mechanical systems with constraint violation stabilization method.’ Journal of Mechanisms, Transmissions and Automation in Design 107, 1985, 493–498.
Baumal, A., McPhee, J.J. and Calamai, P., ‘Application of genetic algorithms to the design optimization of an active vehicle suspension system.’ Journal of Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 163, 1998, 87–94.
Etman, L., Campen, D. and Schoofs, A., ‘Optimization of multibody systems using approximation concepts,’ in Optimization of Mechanical Systems D. Bestle and W. Schiehlen, (eds.), IUTAM-Symposium, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1996.
Haug, E., Wehage, R. and Mani, N., ‘Design sensitivity analysis of large scale constrained dynamic mechanical systems.’ Journal of Mechanisms Transmission and Automation in Design 106, 156–162. 1984.
Kim, M. and Choi, D., ‘Min-max dynamic response optimization of mechanical systems using approximate augmented lagragian.’ International Journal of Numerical Methods in Engineering 43, 1998, 549–564.
Paeng, J. and Arora, J., ‘Dynamic response optimization of mechanical systems with multiplier methods.’ Journal of Mechanisms Transmission and Automation Design 111, 73–80. 1989.
Bestle, D. and Schiehlen W. (eds.), Optimization of Mechanical Systems, IUTAM-Symposium, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1996.
Bestle, D. and Eberhard, P., ‘Multi-criteria multi-model design optimisation,’ Proceedings IUTAM Symposium on Optimization of Mechanical Systems, Bestle, D. and Schiehlen, W. (eds.), Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 33–40. 1996.
Bestle, D. and Eberhard, P., ‘Analyzing and optimizing multibody systems,’ Mech. Struct. Machines 20, 1992, 67–92.
Schiehlen, W., ‘Symbolic computations in multibody systems,’ Computer Aided Analysis of Rigid and Flexible Multibody Systems, Pereira, M.S. and Ambrosio, J.A.C. (eds.), Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 101–136. 1994.
Gillespie, T.D., ‘Fundamentals of Vehicle Dynamics,’ SAE, 1992.
Besselink, I. and van Asparen, F., ‘Numerical optimization of the linear dynamic behavior of commercial vehicles.’ Vehicle System Dynamics 23, 1994, 53–70.
ISO 2631, Guide for Evaluation of Human Exposure to Whole Body Vibration, International Organisation for Standardisation, 1974.
Gim, G. and Nikravesh, P.E., ‘An analytical model of pneumatic tire for vehicle dynamic simulations, Part 1: Pure slip.’ International Journal of Vehicle Design 11, 1990, 589–618.
Pacejka, H. and Sharp, R., ‘Shear Force development by pneumatic tyres in steady state conditions: A review of modelling aspects.’ Vehicle System Dynamics 20, 121–176, 1991.
Nikravesh, P.E., ‘Multibody modeling of a vehicle base on experimentally obtained vibration data,’ in NATO ARW on Computational Aspects of Nonlinear Structural Systems with Large Rigid Body Motion, Ambrósio, J. and Kleiber, M. (eds.), IOS Press, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2000.
Pereira, M. and Proença, P.L., ‘Dynamic analysis of spatial flexible multibody systems using joint coordinates.’ Int. J. Num. Meth. In Engng 32, 1991, 1799–1812.
Yoo, W.S. and Haug, E.J., ‘Dynamics of flexible mechanical systems using vibration and static correction modes.’ Journal of Mechanisms, Transmissions and Automation in Design 108, 1986, 315–322.
ANSYS – Version 5.2, Swanson Analysis Inc, 1995.
Griffin, M. Handbook of human vibration., Academic Press, London, 1990.
Sayers, M.W. and Karamihas, S.M. Interpretation of Road Roughness Profile Data, Final Report, Contract DTFH 61-92-C00143, Report No. FHWA RD-96–101, 1996.
Vanderplaats, G. DOT-Design Optimization Tools, Version 3.0, VMA Engineering, Colorado Springs, Colorado, 1992.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gonçalves, J.P.C., Ambrósio, J.A.C. Road Vehicle Modeling Requirements for Optimization of Ride and Handling. Multibody Syst Dyn 13, 3–23 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11044-005-2528-5
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11044-005-2528-5