Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Plausible reasoning and knowledge extraction in Cognitive IoT

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One central area of current Internet of Things (IoT) research is developing methods for objects to sense their environment autonomously and then link them together so that they can exchange their findings quickly. In response to this urgent need, a new paradigm has emerged that is known as the Cognitive Internet of Things (CIoT). It adds cognitive capability in the form of sophisticated intelligence to the existing IoT. With the generation of huge amounts of data by CIoT applications, there is a compelling need to derive valuable insights from data in a computationally efficient way. Therefore, this research proposes the modified plausible reasoning for extracting knowledge from massive heterogeneous datasets. In the first step, the data is passed onto total variance regularizers to regularise the variance. Subsequently, the clusters are created with probabilistic clustering, and the plausibility theory is redefined at the cluster and the cluster-member levels. The experimental assessment of the environmental data spanning 21.25 years and the cross-validation using a variety of measures demonstrate that the proposed method is more effective than other competing approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data will be made available as per request.

References

  1. Atzori L, Iera A, Morabito G (2010) The internet of things: a survey. Comput Netw 54(15):2787–2805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Perera C, Qin Y, Estrella JC et al (2017) Fog computing for sustainable smart cities: a survey. ACM Comput Surv 50:1. https://doi.org/10.1145/3057266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Palattella MR, Accettura N, Vilajosana X et al (2013) Standardized protocol stack for the internet of (important) things. IEEE Commun Surv Tutorials 15:1389–1406. https://doi.org/10.1109/SURV.2012.111412.00158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mokari H, Firouzmand E, Sharifi I, Doustmohammadi A (2024) Resilient control strategy and attack detection on platooning of smart vehicles under DoS attack. ISA Trans 144:51–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isatra.2023.11.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Alahdadi A, Safaei AA, Ebadi MJ (2023) A truthful and budget-balanced double auction model for resource allocation in cloud computing. Soft Comput 27:18263–18284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-023-08081-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wijewickrama R, Maiti A, Jadliwala M (2021) Write to know: on the feasibility of wrist motion based userauthentication from handwriting. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM Conference on Security and Privacy in Wireless and Mobile Networks. pp 335–346. https://doi.org/10.1145/3448300.3468290

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Yang H, Wang Z, Song K (2022) A new hybrid grey wolf optimizer-feature weighted-multiple kernel-support vector regression technique to predict TBM performance. Eng Comput 38:2469–2485. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-020-01217-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Yang HQ, Xing SG, Wang Q, Li Z (2018) Model test on the entrainment phenomenon and energy conversion mechanism of flow-like landslides. Eng Geol 239:119–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.03.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Akbar A, Carrez F, Moessner K, Zoha A (2015) Predicting complex events for pro-active IoT applications. 2015 IEEE 2nd World Forum on Internet of things. WF-IoT), IEEE, pp 327–332

  10. Agrawal N, Rellermeyer J, Ding AY (2019) IoT resource-aware orchestration framework for edge computing. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on emerging Networking EXperiments and Technologies. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp 62–64

  11. Dard G, Mangortey E, Pinon OJ, Mavris DN (2019) Application of data fusion and machine learning to the analysis of the relevance of recommended flight reroutes. AIAA Aviat 2019 Forum 1–22. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2019-3189

  12. Abdallah M, Abu Talib M, Hosny M et al (2022) Forecasting highly fluctuating electricity load using machine learning models based on multimillion observations. Adv Eng Inf 53:101707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2022.101707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fu C, Sayed T (2022) Bayesian dynamic extreme value modeling for conflict-based real-time safety analysis. Anal Methods Accid Res 34:100204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amar.2021.100204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Al-Jarrah OY, Yoo PD, Muhaidat S et al (2015) Efficient machine learning for big data: a review. Big Data Res 2:87–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bdr.2015.04.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yoo C, Ramirez L, Liuzzi J (2014) Big data analysis using modern statistical and machine learning methods in medicine. Int Neurourol J 18:50. https://doi.org/10.5213/inj.2014.18.2.50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Babu AA, Kumar GD, BalaMurali R, Kondaiah K (n.d) Big Data Analytics: A Classification of Data Quality Assessment and Improvement Methods

  17. Xu Y, Sun Y, Wan J et al (2017) Industrial big data for fault diagnosis: taxonomy, review, and applications. IEEE Access 5:17368–17380. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2731945

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Diao X, Pietrykowski M, Huang F et al (2022) An ontology-based fault generation and fault propagation analysis approach for safety-critical computer systems at the design stage. Artif Intell Eng Des Anal Manuf 36:e1. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0890060421000342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang L, Liu Y, Zhou J et al (2022) An Imbalanced Fault diagnosis Method based on TFFO and CNN for Rotating Machinery. Sensors 22:8749. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22228749

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ou C, Zhu H, Shardt YAW et al (2022) Quality-Driven regularization for Deep Learning Networks and its application to Industrial Soft Sensors. IEEE Trans Neural Networks Learn Syst 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2022.3144162

  21. Sun Z, Jin H, Xu Y et al (2022) Severity-insensitive fault diagnosis method for heat pump systems based on improved benchmark model and data scaling strategy. Energy Build 256:111733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.111733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ramírez R, Selin C (2014) Plausibility and probability in scenario planning. Foresight 16:54–74. https://doi.org/10.1108/FS-08-2012-0061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Jaynes ET (1988). How does the brain do plausible reasoning?. In Maximum-entropy and Bayesian methods in science and engineering: Foundations. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3049-0_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Mishra AK, Roy P, Bandyopadhyay S (2021) Binary particle swarm optimization based feature selection (BPSO-FS) for improving breast cancer prediction

  25. Fathalla A, Li K, Salah A, Mohamed MF (2022) An LSTM-based distributed scheme for data transmission reduction of IoT systems. Neurocomputing 485:166–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2021.02.105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Gui H, Liu J, Ma C et al (2022) New mist-edge-fog-cloud system architecture for thermal error prediction and control enabled by deep-learning. Eng Appl Artif Intell 109:104626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2021.104626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Salim C, Mitton N (2021) K-predictions based data reduction approach in WSN for smart agriculture. Computing 103:509–532. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00607-020-00864-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Yu T, Wang X, Shami A (2017) A Novel Fog Computing Enabled Temporal Data Reduction Scheme in IoT Systems. In: GLOBECOM 2017–2017 IEEE Global Communications Conference. IEEE, pp 1–5

  29. Deng H, Guo Z, Lin R, Zou H (2019) Fog Computing Architecture-Based Data Reduction Scheme for WSN. In: 2019 1st International Conference on Industrial Artificial Intelligence (IAI). IEEE, pp 1–6

  30. Manocha A, Singh R, Verma P (2020) An internet of things fog-assisted sleep-deprivation prediction Framework for spinal cord Injury patients. Computer (Long Beach Calif) 53:46–56. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2019.2916829

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Taneja M, Jalodia N, Davy A (2019) Distributed Decomposed Data Analytics in Fog enabled IoT deployments. IEEE Access 7:40969–40981. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2907808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Peixoto MLM, Maia AHO, Mota E et al (2021) A traffic data clustering framework based on fog computing for VANETs. Veh Commun 31:100370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vehcom.2021.100370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Agarwal P, Alam M (2022) Edge optimized and personalized lifelogging framework using ensembled metaheuristic algorithms. Comput Electr Eng 100:107884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2022.107884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Wang J, Meyer MC, Wu Y, Wang Y (2019) Maximum Data-Resolution Efficiency for Fog-Computing Supported Spatial Big Data Processing in Disaster Scenarios. IEEE Trans Parallel Distrib Syst 30:1826–1842. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPDS.2019.2896143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Taneja M, Jalodia N, Byabazaire J et al (2019) SmartHerd management: a microservices-based fog computing–assisted IoT platform towards data‐driven smart dairy farming. Softw Pract Exp 49:1055–1078. https://doi.org/10.1002/spe.2704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Xin X, Li SG, Garg H et al (2022) Connected Degree of Fuzzifying Matroids. J Math 2022:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7811196

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  37. Zhong W, Huang J, Liu Q, Zhou M, Wang J, Yin J, Duan N (2022) Reasoning over Hybrid Chain for Table-and-Text Open Domain Question Answering. In IJCAI. pp 4531–4537

    Google Scholar 

  38. Kegyes T, Süle Z, Abonyi J (2021) The applicability of reinforcement learning methods in the development of industry 4.0 applications. Complexity 2021. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/7179374

  39. Chen W, Qiu X, Cai T et al (2021) Deep reinforcement learning for internet of things: a Comprehensive Survey. IEEE Commun Surv Tutorials 23:1659–1692. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2021.3073036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Latif S, Driss M, Boulila W et al (2021) Deep learning for the Industrial Internet of things (IIoT): a comprehensive survey of techniques, implementation frameworks, potential applications, and future directions. Sensors 21:7518. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21227518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Osifeko MO, Hancke GP, Abu-Mahfouz AM (2020) Artificial Intelligence techniques for cognitive sensing in future IoT: state-of-the-Art, potentials, and challenges. J Sens Actuator Netw 9:21. https://doi.org/10.3390/jsan9020021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Hasan T, Malik J, Bibi I et al (2022) Securing industrial internet of things against botnet attacks using hybrid deep learning approach. IEEE Trans Netw Sci Eng: 1–1. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSE.2022.3168533

  43. Ding J, Tang T, Zhang Y, Chi W (2022) Using intelligent ontology technology to extract knowledge from successful project in IoT enterprise systems. Enterp Inf Syst 16. https://doi.org/10.1080/17517575.2021.1913240

  44. Zeng X, Tu X, Liu Y et al (2022) Toward better drug discovery with knowledge graph. Curr Opin Struct Biol 72:114–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbi.2021.09.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Liang B, Su H, Gui L et al (2022) Aspect-based sentiment analysis via affective knowledge enhanced graph convolutional networks. Knowledge-Based Syst 235:107643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2021.107643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Meng F, Yang S, Wang J et al (2022) Creating knowledge graph of Electric Power Equipment faults based on BERT–BiLSTM–CRF Model. J Electr Eng Technol 17:2507–2516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42835-022-01032-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Selesnick I (2012) Total variation denoising (an MM Algorithm). Matrix 2012:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  48. Wang Q, Gao QX, Sun G, Ding C (2020) Double robust principal component analysis. Neurocomputing 391:119–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2020.01.097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Puschmann D, Barnaghi P, Tafazolli R (2017) Adaptive clustering for dynamic IoT Data streams. IEEE Internet Things J 4:64–74. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2016.2618909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. McLachlan GJ, Lee SX, Rathnayake SI (2019) Finite Mixture models. Annu Rev Stat Its Appl 6:355–378. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-statistics-031017-100325

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  51. Diaz-Rozo J, Bielza C, Larrañaga P (2017) Machine learning-based CPS for Clustering High throughput Machining Cycle conditions. Procedia Manuf 10:997–1008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Bouguelia M-R, Karlsson A, Pashami S et al (2018) Mode tracking using multiple data streams. Inf Fusion 43:33–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2017.11.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Zheng HT, Yao X, Jiang Y, Xia ST, Xiao X (2017) Boost clickbait detection based on user behavior analysis. Web and Big Data: First International Joint Conference, APWeb-WAIM 2017, Beijing, China, July 7–9, 2017, Proceedings, Part II 1. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63564-4_6

  54. Gama J, Žliobaitė I, Bifet A et al (2014) A survey on concept drift adaptation. ACM Comput Surv 46:1–37. https://doi.org/10.1145/2523813

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Frederickson C, Gracie T, Portley S et al (2017) Adding adaptive intelligence to sensor systems with MASS. In: 2017 IEEE Sensors Applications Symposium (SAS). IEEE, pp 1–6

  56. Dias JG (2006) Latent class analysis and model selection. In From Data and Information Analysis to Knowledge Engineering: Proceedings of the 29th Annual Conference of the Gesellschaft für Klassifikation eV University of Magdeburg, March 9–11, 2005. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 95–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-31314-1_10

  57. Hurvich CM, Tsai CL (1989) Regression and time series model selection in small samples. Biometrika 76:297–307. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/76.2.297

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  58. Fraley C, Raftery AE (1998) How many clusters? Which clustering method? Answers via model-based cluster analysis. Comput J 41:586–588. https://doi.org/10.1093/comjnl/41.8.578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Celeux G, Govaert G (1995) Gaussian parsimonious clustering models. Pattern Recognit 28:781–793. https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-3203(94)00125-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Brito P, Duarte Silva AP (2012) Modelling interval data with normal and skew-normal distributions. J Appl Stat 39:3–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/02664763.2011.575125

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  61. Fraley C, Raftery AE, Scrucca L (2012) Normal mixture modeling for model-based clustering, classification, and density estimation. Dep Stat Univ Washingt 23:2012

    Google Scholar 

  62. Lu Z, Lou W (2023) Bayesian approaches to variable selection in mixture models with application to disease clustering. J Appl Stat 50(2):387–407. https://doi.org/10.1080/02664763.2021.1994529

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  63. Mecibah MS, Boukelia TE, Tahtah R, Gairaa K (2014) Introducing the best model for estimation the monthly mean daily global solar radiation on a horizontal surface (case study: Algeria). Renew Sustain Energy Rev 36:194–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.04.054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Pekaslan D, Chen C, Wagner C, Garibaldi JM (2020) Performance and Interpretability in Fuzzy Logic Systems–can we have both? In Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems: 18th International Conference, IPMU 2020, Lisbon, Portugal, June 15–19, 2020, Proceedings, Part I 18. Springer International Publishing, pp 571–584. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50146-4_42

  65. Chen C, Twycross J, Garibaldi JM (2017) A new accuracy measure based on bounded relative error for time series forecasting. PLoS ONE 12:e0174202. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Jaynes ET (1982) On the rationale of maximum-entropy methods. Proc IEEE 70:939–952. https://doi.org/10.1109/PROC.1982.12425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Chen M, Qu R, Fang W (2022) Case-based reasoning system for fault diagnosis of aero-engines. Expert Syst Appl 202:117350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.117350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. LeClair A, Jaskolka J, MacCaull W, Khedri R (2022) Architecture for ontology-supported multi-context reasoning systems. Data Knowl Eng 140:102044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.datak.2022.102044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Duan J, Lin Z, Jiao F et al (2022) A dynamic case-based reasoning system for responding to infectious disease outbreaks. Expert Syst Appl 204:117628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.117628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Sap M, Shwartz V, Bosselut A, Choi Y, Roth D (2020) Commonsense reasoning for natural language processing. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Tutorial Abstracts. pp 27–33. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.acl-tutorials.7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  71. Kaswan KS, Dhatterwal JS, Balyan A (2022) Intelligent agents based integration of machine learning and case base reasoning system. In: 2022 2nd International Conference on Advance Computing and Innovative Technologies in Engineering (ICACITE). IEEE, pp 1477–1481

  72. Babichev S, Lytvynenko V, Wójcik W, Vyshemyrskaya S (eds) (2020) Lecture Notes in Computational Intelligence and Decision Making: 2020 International Scientific Conference" Intellectual Systems of Decision-making and Problems of Computational Intelligence" (Vol. 1246). Springer Nature

  73. Xu Y (2022) Dialogue Explanation With Reasoning for AI. In: Proceedings of the 2022 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society. ACM, New York, pp 918–918

Download references

Acknowledgements

A lot of thanks to the EIC, editor and all those reviewers who had given their precious time for valuable suggestion, comment and their active participation in our research work. Also, we are very grateful to all those who have directly or indirectly enhanced our research work.

Funding

No funding is provided for the preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Applications, National Institute of Technology, Raipur, India

    Vidyapati Jha & Priyanka Tripathi

Authors
  1. Vidyapati Jha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Priyanka Tripathi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Vidyapati Jha and Priyanka Tripathi equally contributed to this research.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vidyapati Jha.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Consent to participate

All the authors involved have agreed to participate in this submitted article.

Consent to publish

All the authors involved in this manuscript give full consent for publication of this submitted article.

Conflict of interest

Authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jha, V., Tripathi, P. Plausible reasoning and knowledge extraction in Cognitive IoT. Multimed Tools Appl (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-024-19382-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-024-19382-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation