Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Power efficient module in single chip for the energy optimized dynamic IoT communication

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The design of a power-efficient Internet of Things (IoT) dynamic communication system is the most required task for digital applications. However, allocating the optimal power based on the user requests is not an easy task. So, the current research article has planned to design a novel Firefly-based Power Estimation and Allocation (FbPEA) strategy for the communication microarchitecture. Here, the presented model is processed on the power chip of the microarchitecture module. Consequently, the data has been transmitted, and parameters were estimated in the LabView environment. Moreover, designing the microarchitecture of the LabView platform is new in the IoT communication fields. Compared to other tools, LabView has better power optimization and execution time results. Hence, using the LabView tool for the microarchitecture design has reduced the computation cost and complexity score of the designed FbPEA dynamic communication microarchitecture. The designed microarchitecture's efficiency has been verified with some critical parameters like power usage, execution time, and energy consumption.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Algorithm 1
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

References

  1. Gunisetti L, Koduri SB, Jagannathan V (2022) Optimized deep learning system for smart maize leaf disease detection in IoT platform via routing algorithm. Multimed Tools Appl. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-022-13775-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Baghban H, Huang CY, Hsu CH (2022) Latency minimization model towards high-efficiency edge-IoT service provisioning in horizontal edge federation. Multimed Tools Appl 81:26803–26820. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-021-11009-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Alassaf N, Gutub A, Parah SA et al (2019) Enhancing the speed of SIMON: A light-weight-cryptographic algorithm for IoT applications. Multimed Tools Appl 78:32633–32657. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-018-6801-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Farooq MJ, Zhu Q (2019) Modeling, analysis, and mitigation of dynamic botnet formation in wireless IoT networks. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur 14(9):2412–2426. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIFS.2019.2898817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sahay R, Meng W, Estay DAS, Jensen CD (2019) CyberShip-IoT: A dynamic and adaptive SDN-based security policy enforcement framework for ships. Future Gener Comput Syst 100:736–750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2019.05.049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Raut NB, Dhanya NM (2020) A green dynamic internet of things (IoT)-battery powered things aspect-survey. Soft computing: Theories and applications, Springer, Singapore, pp 153–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4032-5_16

  7. Fu X, Yu FR, Wang J, Qi Q, Liao J (2019) Dynamic service function chain embedding for NFV-enabled IoT: A deep reinforcement learning approach. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun 19(1):507–519. https://doi.org/10.1109/TWC.2019.2946797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Alam M, Ahmed N, Matam R, Ahmed Barbhuiya F, Mukherjee M (2021) Pro-Edge: A Programmable Edge Network Architecture for Industrial Internet of Things. https://doi.org/10.36227/techrxiv.16885003

  9. Wang L, Xiong X, Zhan J, Gao W, Wen X, Kang G, Tang F (2021) Wpc: Whole-picture workload characterization across intermediate representation, isa, and microarchitecture. IEEE Comput Archit Lett 20(2):86–89. https://doi.org/10.1109/LCA.2021.3087828

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang H, Sayadi H, Sasan A, Rafatirad S, Homayoun H (2020) Hybridg: Hybrid dynamic time warping and gaussian distribution model for detecting emerging zero-day microarchitectural side-channel attacks. 2020 19th IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA), IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMLA51294.2020.00101

  11. Sepúlveda J (2021) Secure Cryptography Integration: NoC-Based Microarchitectural Attacks and Countermeasures. Network-on-Chip Security and Privacy, Springer, Cham, pp 153–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69131-8_7

  12. Sreekumar R, Stan MR (2021) Microarchitecture Optimization for Asynchronous Stochastic Computing. 2021 28th IEEE International Conference on Electronics, Circuits, and Systems (ICECS), IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICECS53924.2021.9665644

  13. Boubakri M, Chiatante F, Zouari B (2021) Towards a firmware TPM on RISC-V. 2021 Design, Automation & Test in Europe Conference & Exhibition (DATE), IEEE. https://doi.org/10.23919/DATE51398.2021.9474152https://doi.org/10.23919/DATE51398.2021.9474152

  14. Banerjee U, Chandrakasan AP (2021) A Low-Power Elliptic Curve Pairing Crypto-Processor for Secure Embedded Blockchain and Functional Encryption. 2021 IEEE Custom Integrated Circuits Conference (CICC), IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/CICC51472.2021.9431552

  15. Si Q, Rashid I, Schafer BC (2021) Micro-architecture Tuning for Dynamic Frequency Scaling in Coarse-Grain Runtime Reconfigurable Arrays with Adaptive Clock Domain Support. 2021 IEEE Computer Society Annual Symposium on VLSI (ISVLSI), IEEE.https://doi.org/10.1109/ISVLSI51109.2021.00047

  16. Kumar S, Saeed F (2021) Communication-avoiding micro-architecture to compute Xcorr scores for peptide identification. 2021 31st International Conference on Field-Programmable Logic and Applications (FPL), IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/FPL53798.2021.00024

  17. Vicarte JRS, Shome P, Nayak N, Trippel C, Morrison A, Kohlbrenner D, Fletcher CW (2021) Opening Pandora’s Box: A Systematic Study of New Ways Microarchitecture Can Leak Private Data. 2021 ACM/IEEE 48th Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture (ISCA), IEEE.https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCA52012.2021.00035

  18. Choi Y, Jeong Y, Jang D, Kang BB, Lee H (2022) EmuID: Detecting the presence of emulation through microarchitectural characteristic on ARM. Comput Secur 113:102569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2021.102569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Forcioli Q, Danger JL, Maurice C, Bossuet L, Bruguier F, Mushtaq M, Novo D, France L, Benoit P, Guilley S, Perianin T (2021) Virtual Platform to Analyze the Security of a System on Chip at Microarchitectural Level. 2021 IEEE European Symposium on Security and Privacy Workshops (EuroS&PW), IEEE.https://doi.org/10.1109/EuroSPW54576.2021.00017

  20. Muzaffar S, Elfadel IM (2019) A domain-specific processor microarchitecture for energy-efficient, dynamic IoT communication. IEEE Trans Very Large Scale Integr (VLSI) Syst 27(9):2074-2087. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVLSI.2019.2911393

  21. Nannipieri P, Baldanzi L, Crocetti L, Di Matteo S, Falaschi F, Fanucci L, Saponara S (2022) CRFlex: A Flexible and Configurable Cryptographic Hardware Accelerator for AES Block Cipher Modes. International Conference on Applications in Electronics Pervading Industry, Environment and Society, Springer, Cham.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95498-7_5

  22. Kansakar P, Munir A (2018) Selecting Microarchitecture Configuration of Processors for Internet of Things. IEEE Trans Emerg Topics Comput 8(4):973–985. https://doi.org/10.1109/TETC.2018.2817923

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bora S, Paily R (2020) A high-performance core microarchitecture based on RISC-V ISA for low power applications. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst II: Express Briefs 68(6):2132–2136. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSII.2020.3043204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Jin Y, Cai J, Xu J, Huan Y, Yan Y, Huang B, Guo Y, Zheng L, Zou Z (2021) Self-aware distributed deep learning framework for heterogeneous IoT edge devices. Future Gener Comput Syst 125:908–920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2021.07.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kiat WP, Mok KM, Lee WK, Goh HG, Achar R (2020) An energy efficient FPGA partial reconfiguration based micro-architectural technique for IoT applications. Microprocess Microsyst 73:102966. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpro.2019.102966

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Soliman WG, Priya BK, Reddy DA, Anusha PVS, Rama Koti Reddy DV (2020) Reconfigurable microarchitecture-based pmdc prototype development for IoT edge computing utilization. IEEE Sens J 21(2):2334–2345. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2020.3020362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hamdi MM, Audah L, Rashid SA (2022) Data Dissemination in VANETs Using Clustering and Probabilistic Forwarding Based on Adaptive Jumping Multi-Objective Firefly Optimization. IEEE Access 10:14624–14642. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3147498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Özkaya Ö, Örs B (2024) Model-based, fully simulated, system-level power consumption estimation of IoT devices. Microprocess Microsyst 105:105009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpro.2024.105009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Liu X, Kamineni S, Breiholz J, Calhoun BH, Li S (2024) A Sub-$\mu $ W Energy-Performance-Aware IoT SoC With a Triple-Mode Power Management Unit for System Performance Scaling, Fast DVFS, and Energy Minimization. IEEE J Solid-State Circuits 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSSC.2024.3350449

  30. Agiollo A, Bellavista P, Mendula M, Omicini A (2024) EneA-FL: Energy-aware orchestration for serverless federated learning. Future Gener Comput Syst 154:219–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2024.01.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Trilles S, Hammad SS, Iskandaryan D (2024) Anomaly detection based on Artificial Intelligence of Things: A Systematic Literature Mapping. Internet of Things 25:101063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iot.2024.101063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Nandhakumar AR, Baranwal A, Choudhary P, Golec M, Gill SS (2024) Edgeaisim: A toolkit for simulation and modelling of ai models in edge computing environments. Meas: Sens 31:100939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measen.2023.100939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Yang M, Ahmed T, Inagaki S, Sakiyama K, Li Y, Hara-Azumi Y (2024) Hardware/Software Cooperative Design Against Power Side-Channel Attacks on IoT Devices. IEEE Internet Things J. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2024.3355417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Cirne A, Sousa PR, Resende JS, Antunes L (2024) Hardware security for Internet of Things identity assurance. IEEE Commun Surv Tutor. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2024.3355168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Hussein E, Waschneck B, Mayr C (2024) Automating application-driven customization of ASIPs: A survey. J Syst Archit 148:103080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sysarc.2024.103080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Ali S, Li Q, Yousafzai A (2024) Blockchain and federated learning-based intrusion detection approaches for edge-enabled industrial IoT networks: A survey. Ad Hoc Netw 152:103320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adhoc.2023.103320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Cheng L, Gu Y, Liu Q, Yang L, Liu C, Wang Y (2024) Advancements in Accelerating Deep Neural Network Inference on AIoT Devices: A Survey. IEEE Trans Sustain Comput 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSUSC.2024.3353176

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Vel Tech Rangarajan Dr. Sagunthala R&D Institute of Science and Technology, Tamil Nadu, 600062, India

    Nitesh Gaikwad & S. Shiyamala

Authors
  1. Nitesh Gaikwad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S. Shiyamala
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Nitesh Gaikwad and Dr. S. Shiyamala have contributed equally to the work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nitesh Gaikwad.

Ethics declarations

Disclosure of potential conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no potential conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All applicable institutional and/or national guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.

Informed consent

For this type of analysis, formal consent is not needed.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gaikwad, N., Shiyamala, S. Power efficient module in single chip for the energy optimized dynamic IoT communication. Multimed Tools Appl (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-024-19273-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-024-19273-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation