Skip to main content
Log in

Classification of ECG signals based on local fractal feature

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Accurate and automatic analysis of electrocardiogram (ECG) signals plays a key role in the diagnosis of cardiovascular disease. This paper aims to investigate the performance of the multifractal detrending fluctuation analysis (MF-DFA) method based on a sliding window in ECG signal classification. We apply ECG signals to the detrended fluctuation analysis (DFA) method to obtain a group of local Hurst exponents and compose the DFA series. Afterwards, we use the MF-DFA method to get 6 generalized Hurst exponents of atrial premature beats (APB) and ECG signals with normal sinus rhythm (NSR), respectively. The 6 generalized Hurst exponents compose a feature vector and it is used in support vector machine (SVM) to examine the accuracy of ECG signal classification. The calculated results show that the MF-DFA method combined with a sliding window (SWD-MF-DFA) method performs well. Compared with directly using the MF-DFA method, with the same parameters, the accuracy of SWD-MF-DFA is higher, so as is the sensitivity and the specificity. As well, the proposed model can better analyze the local detailed features of time series and allows the application of MF-DFA in different parts of the time series, enabling the detection and analysis of time series variability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Data Availibility Statement

The datasets of ECG signals analysed during the current study are available in the MIT-BIH Arrhythmia Database and the data can be acquired from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Ahmad S, Mehfuz S, Mebarek-Oudina F, Beg J (2022) RSM analysis based cloud access security broker: a systematic literature review. Cluster Comput 25(5):3733–3763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Nyo MT, Mebarek-Oudina F, Hlaing SS, Khan NA (2022) Otsu?s thresholding technique for MRI image brain tumor segmentation. Multimedia Tools Appl 81(30):43837–43849

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dong X, Wang C, Si W (2017) ECG beat classification via deterministic learning. Neurocomputing 240:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dalal S, Vishwakarma VP (2021) Classification of ECG signals using multi-cumulants based evolutionary hybrid classifier. Sci Rep-UK 11(1):15092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sangaiah AK, Arumugam M, Bian GB (2020) An intelligent learning approach for improving ECG signal classification and arrhythmia analysis. Artif Intell Med 103:101788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang S, Li R, Wang X, Shen S, Zhou B, Wang Z (2021) Multiscale residual network based on channel spatial attention mechanism for multilabel ECG classification. J Healthc Eng 2021:6630643

    Google Scholar 

  7. Einthoven W (1902) Galvanometrische registratie van het menschelijk electrocardiogram. Herinneringsbundel Professor S S Rosenstein 101–107

  8. Vafaie MH, Ataei M, Koofigar HR (2014) Heart diseases prediction based on ECG signals? classification using a genetic-fuzzy system and dynamical model of ECG signals. Biomed Signal Proces 14:291–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ji Y, Zhang S, Xiao W (2019) Electrocardiogram classification based on faster regions with convolutional neural network. Sensors 19(11):2558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. He R, Liu Y, Wang K, Zhao N, Yuan Y, Li Q, Zhang H (2019) Automatic cardiac arrhythmia classification using combination of deep residual network and bidirectional LSTM. IEEE Access 7:102119–102135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Diker A, Sönmez Y, Özyurt F, Avcı E, Avcı D (2021) Examination of the ECG signal classification technique DEA-ELM using deep convolutional neural network features. Multimed Tools Appl 80:24777–24800

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Venkatesan C, Karthigaikumar P, Varatharajan R (2018) A novel LMS algorithm for ECG signal preprocessing and KNN classifier based abnormality detection. Multimed Tools Appl 77(8):10365–10374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. da Silva Filho AM, Zebende GF, Guedes EF (2021) Analysis of intentional lethal violent crimes: a sliding windows approach. Physica A 567:125653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Jeon H, Kim SL, Kim S, Lee D (2020) Fast wearable sensor?based foot?ground contact phase classification using a convolutional neural network with sliding-window label overlapping. Sensors 20(17):4996

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Papaloukas C, Fotiadis DI, Liavas AP, Likas A, Michalis LK (2001) A knowledge-based technique for automated detection of ischaemic episodes in long duration electrocardiograms. Med Biol Eng Comput 39(1):105–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tsipouras MG, Fotiadis DI, Sideris D (2005) An arrhythmia classification system based on the RR-interval signal. Artif Intell Med 33(3):237–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yang R, Zha X, Liu K, Xu S (2021) A CNN model embedded with local feature knowledge and its application to time-varying signal classification. Neural Networks 142:564–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Peng CK, Buldyrev SV, Havlin S, Simons M, Stanley HE, Goldberger AL (1994) Mosaic organization of DNA nucleotides. Phys Rev E 49(2):1685–1689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Peng CK, Havlin S, Stanley HE, Goldberger AL (1995) Quantification of scaling exponents and crossover phenomena in nonstationary heartbeat time series. Chaos 5(1):82–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pranata AA, Adhane GW, Kim DS (2017, January) Detrended fluctuation analysis on ECG device for home environment. In: 2017 14th IEEE annual consumer communications & networking conference (CCNC) IEEE, pp 126–130

  21. Kantelhardt JW, Zschiegner SA, Koscielny-Bunde E, Havlin S, Bunde A, Stanley HE (2002) Multifractal detrended fluctuation analysis of nonstationary time series. Physica A 316(1–4):87–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Méndez-Gordillo AR, Cadenas E (2021) Wind speed forecasting by the extraction of the multifractal patterns of time series through the multiplicative cascade technique. Chaos Soliton Fract 143:110592

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Li S, Xu N, Hui X (2020) International investors and the multifractality property: evidence from accessible and inaccessible market. Physica A 559:125029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang Z, Wen T, Huang W, Wang M, Li C (2017) Automatic epileptic seizure detection in EEGs using MF-DFA, SVM based on cloud computing. J X-ray Sci Technol 25(2):261–272

    Google Scholar 

  25. Jiao D, Wang Z, Li J, Feng F, Hou F (2020) The chaotic characteristics detection based on multifractal detrended fluctuation analysis of the elderly 12-lead ECG signals. Physica A 540:123234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang J, Shao W, Kim J (2020) ECG classification comparison between Mf-DFA and Mf-DXA. Fractals 29(02):2150029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang J, Jiang W, Yan Y, Chen W, Kim J (2021) ECG classification using multifractal detrended moving average cross-correlation analysis. Int J Mod Phys B 35(32):2150327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Mishra AK, Raghav S (2010) Local fractal dimension based ECG arrhythmia classification. Biomed Signal Proces 5(2):114–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Li HF, Lee SY (2009) Mining frequent itemsets over data streams using efficient window sliding techniques. Expert Syst Appl 36(2):1466–1477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Vapnik V (1999) The nature of statistical learning theory. Springer science & business media

  31. Liu D et al (2016) Precipitation complexity measurement using multifractal spectra empirical mode decomposition detrended fluctuation analysis. Water Resour Manag 30(2):505–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Li Y et al (2018) Combining convolutional neural network and distance distribution matrix for identification of congestive heart failure. IEEE Access 6:39734–39744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Liang Y, Yin S, Tang Q, Zheng Z, Elgendi M, Chen Z (2020) Deep learning algorithm classifies heartbeat events based on electrocardiogram signals. Front Physiol 11:569050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kuila S, Dhanda N, Joardar S (2022) ECG signal classification and arrhythmia detection using ELM-RNN. Multimedia Tools Appl 81(18):25233–25249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Romdhane TF, Pr MA (2020) Electrocardiogram heartbeat classification based on a deep convolutional neural network and focal loss. Comput Biol Med 123:103866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Tseng KK, Wang C, Xiao T, Chen CM, Hassan MM, de Albuquerque VHC (2021) Sliding large kernel of deep learning algorithm for mobile electrocardiogram diagnosis. Comput Electr Eng 96:107521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Naqvi SF et al (2020) Real-time stress assessment using sliding window based convolutional neural network. Sensors 20(16):4400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Ma S, Cui J, Chen CL, Chen X, Ma Y (2022) An effective data enhancement method for classification of ECG arrhythmia. Measurement 203:111978

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The corresponding author Jian Wang was supported by the Open Project of Center for Applied Mathematics of Jiangsu Province (Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology). In addition, the authors are grateful to Haixiao Wang for his contributions in language editing and polishing. Meanwhile, the authors express deep gratitude to the reviewers for their valuable suggestions and comments, which significantly improved the quality of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jian Wang.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jiang, W., Wang, J. Classification of ECG signals based on local fractal feature. Multimed Tools Appl 83, 54773–54789 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-023-17787-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-023-17787-4

Keywords

Navigation