Skip to main content
Log in

SAR U-Net: Spatial attention residual U-Net structure for water body segmentation from remote sensing satellite images

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The analysis of remote-sensing images always requires the extraction of data about the aquatic environment. However, it might be challenging to identify any water surface since the backgrounds of water zones in remote sensing images are usually complicated structures and dense vegetation. Furthermore, less significant tributaries and edge data could not be accurately detected using traditional water detection methods. As a result, a spatial attention residual U-Net architecture is proposed to enhance the effectiveness of water body segmentation. The suggested approach reweights the feature representation spatially to obtain data on water features, using U-Net as the network architecture. The feature of the water zone is obtained using the residual block. It obtains more precise local position data for the water zone, which enhance edge segmentation accuracy. The spatial attention module retrieves, segregates, and combines the low-level information and high-level information as two discrete inputs in various dimensions. To effectively segregate the water region from the context, the spatial attention module combines spatial features with deep contextual information. The experiments are performed using satellite images of kaggle dataset aquatic bodies and a real-time dataset. The results of the experiments reveal 96% of accuracy that the suggested strategy out performs the existing models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

https://www.kaggle.com/franciscoescobar/satellite-images-of-water-bodies

References

  1. Tambe RG, Talbar SN, Chavan SS (2021) Deep multi-feature learning architecture for water body segmentation from satellite images. J Vis Commun Image Represent 77:103141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Aalan Babu A, Mary Anita Rajam V (2020) Water-body segmentation from satellite images using Kapur's entropy-based thresholding method. Comput Intell 36(3):1242–1260

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Xia M, Cui Y, Zhang Y, Xu Y, Liu J, Xu Y (2021) DAU-Net: a novel water areas segmentation structure for remote sensing image. Int J Remote Sens 42(7):2594–2621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Duan L, Hu X (2019) Multiscale Refinement Network for Water-Body Segmentation in High-Resolution Satellite Imagery. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, (), 1–5

  5. Zhou YN, Luo J, Shen Z, Hu X, Yang H (2014) Multiscale water body extraction in urban environments from satellite images. IEEE J Select Topics Appl Earth Observ Remote Sens 7(10):4301–4312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang J, Wang S, Wang F, Zhou Y, Wang Z, Ji J, Xiong Y, Zhao Q (2022) FWENet: a deep convolutional neural network for flood water body extraction based on SAR images. Intl J Digital Earth 15(1):345–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen Y, Tang L, Kan Z, Bilal M, Li Q (2020) A novel water body extraction neural network (WBE-NN) for optical high-resolution multispectral imagery. J Hydrol 588:125092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Aroma RJ, Raimond K (2021) Investigation on Spectral Indices and Soft Classifiers-Based Water Body Segmentation Approaches for Satellite Image Analysis. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 49(2):341–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kaplan G, Avdan U (2017) Object-based water body extraction model using Sentinel-2 satellite imagery. Eur J Remote Sens 50(1):137–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yang X, Qin Q, Grussenmeyer P, Koehl M (2018) Urban surface water body detection with suppressed built-up noise based on water indices from Sentinel-2 MSI imagery. Remote Sens Environ 219:259–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Miao Z, Fu K, Sun H, Sun X, Yan M (2018) Automatic water-body segmentation from high-resolution satellite images via deep networks. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett 15(4):602–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Singh S, Girase S (2022) Semantic Segmentation of Satellite Images for Water Body Detection. In Data Intelligence and Cognitive Informatics (pp. 831-840). Springer, Singapore

  13. Li L, Yan Z, Shen Q, Cheng G, Gao L, Zhang B (2019) Water body extraction from very high spatial resolution remote sensing data based on fully convolutional networks. Remote Sens 11(10):1162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Shi W, Sui H (2022) An effective superpixel-based graph convolutional network for small waterbody extraction from remotely sensed imagery. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf 109:102777

    Google Scholar 

  15. Duan L, Hu X (2019) Multiscale refinement network for water-body segmentation in high-resolution satellite imagery. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett 17(4):686–690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Akiyama TS, Junior JM, Gonçalves WN, de Araújo Carvalho M, Eltner A (2021), July. Evaluating different deep learning models for automatic water segmentation. In 2021 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium IGARSS (pp. 4716-4719). IEEE

  17. Moradkhani K, Fathi A (2022) Segmentation of waterbodies in remote sensing images using deep stacked ensemble model. Applied Soft Computing, p.109038

  18. Yuan K, Zhuang X, Schaefer G, Feng J, Guan L, Fang H (2021) Deep-learning-based multispectral satellite image segmentation for water body detection. IEEE J Select Topics Appl Earth Observ Remote Sens 14:7422–7434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Feng W, Sui H, Huang W, Xu C, An K (2018) Water body extraction from very high-resolution remote sensing imagery using deep U-Net and a superpixel-based conditional random field model. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett 16(4):618–622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang X, Li J, Hua Z (2022) MRSE-Net: Multi-Scale Residuals and SE-Attention Network for Water Body Segmentation from Satellite Images. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing

  21. Wang L, Bie W, Li H, Liao T, Ding X, Wu G, Fei T (2022) Small Water Body Detection and Water Quality Variations with Changing Human Activity Intensity in Wuhan. Remote Sensing, 14(1), p.200

  22. Chen S, Liu Y, Zhang C (2021) Water-Body Segmentation for Multi-Spectral Remote Sensing Images by Feature Pyramid Enhancement and Pixel Pair Matching. Int J Remote Sens 42(13):5025–5043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lalchhanhima R, Saha G, Sur SN, Kandar D (2021) Water body segmentation of synthetic aperture radar image using deep convolutional neural networks. Microprocess Microsyst 87:104360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Erfani SMH, Wu Z, Wu X, Wang S, Goharian E (2022) ATLANTIS: A benchmark for semantic segmentation of waterbody images. Environ Model Softw 149:105333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Rajyalakshmi C, Mohan Rao KR, Rao RR (2022) Compressed High Resolution Satellite Image Processing to Detect Water Bodies with Combined Bilateral Filtering and Threshold Techniques. Traitement du Signal, 39(2)

  26. Pal D, Reddy PB, Roy S (2022) Attention UW-Net: A fully connected model for automatic segmentation and annotation of chest X-ray. Comput Biol Med 150:106083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Roy S, Saha S, Dey A, Shaikh SH, Chaki N (2014) Performance evaluation of multiple image binarization algorithms using multiple metrics on standard image databases. In ICT and Critical Infrastructure: Proceedings of the 48th Annual Convention of Computer Society of India-Vol II: Hosted by CSI Vishakapatnam Chapter (pp. 349-360). Springer International Publishing

  28. Roy S, Bhattacharyya D, Bandyopadhyay SK, Kim TH (2017) An improved brain MR image binarization method as a preprocessing for abnormality detection and features extraction. Front Comput Sci 11:717–727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Srivastava V, Kumar D, Roy S (2022) A median based quadrilateral local quantized ternary pattern technique for the classification of dermatoscopic images of skin cancer. Comput Electr Eng 102:108259

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Neha Gupta.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies, whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.

Guarantor

There is no scientific guarantor of this publication

Statistics and biometry

No complex statistical methods were necessary for this paper.

Ethical approval

Institutional Review Board approval was not required.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jonnala, N.S., Gupta, N. SAR U-Net: Spatial attention residual U-Net structure for water body segmentation from remote sensing satellite images. Multimed Tools Appl 83, 44425–44454 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-023-16965-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-023-16965-8

Keywords

Navigation