Skip to main content
Log in

Research on the influence mechanism of key halo effect and Matthew effect on product online word-of-mouth: considering the moderating role of online store service quality

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The company benefits greatly from online word-of-mouth (OWM) for its products through e-commerce platforms. However, previous research neglects the critical influence mechanism of OWM for products sold in online stores, especially the relationships between consumers’ past subjective impressions and OWM. This study innovatively explores the influence mechanism of key halo effect and Matthew effect on product OWM considering the moderating role of online store PSQ namely store trust. We propose a research model and influencing factors for the halo effect and Matthew effect in the e-commerce platform scenario. Collecting about 30,000 online reviews and 160,000 historical consumer reviews from Amazon, we use a semantic similarity model to match online reviews with a standard scale for the relevant variables, combining text mining and econometric analysis. Our results show that the selected hierarchical regression model has better fit than existing common models. And the halo effect and Matthew effect are indeed beneficial to increase product OWM including the indicators of consumer satisfaction and future consumption intention. And there is a reverse effect with low perceived service quality and star rating Matthew effect on product OWM is not supported. These findings help us understand consumers’ online comment behaviors, and have deep implications for e-commerce platforms and related companies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data generated or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Ahmadinejad B (2019) The impact of customer satisfaction on word of mouth marketing (Case study: Bamilo online store). SCIREA J Manag 3(2):40–52

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alfoqahaa S (2018) Critical success factors of small and medium-sized enterprises in Palestine. J Res Mark Entrep 20(2):170–188

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ali A, Zhu Y, Zakarya M (2021) A data aggregation based approach to exploit dynamic spatio-temporal correlations for citywide crowd flows prediction in fog computing. Multimed Tools Appl 80:31401–31433

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ali A, Zhu Y, Zakarya M (2021) Exploiting dynamic spatio-temporal correlations for citywide traffic flow prediction using attention based neural networks. Inf Sci 577:852–870

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Ali A, Zhu Y, Zakarya M (2022) Exploiting dynamic spatio-temporal graph convolutional neural networks for citywide traffic flows prediction. Neural Netw 145:233–247

    Google Scholar 

  6. Alonso-Almeida MDM, Bernardo M, Llach J, Marimon F (2014) Building loyalty through functional and hedonic quality. Ind Manag Data Syst 114(3):387–404

    Google Scholar 

  7. Askalidis G, Kim SJ, Malthouse EC (2017) Understanding and overcoming biases in online review systems. Decis Support Syst 97:23–30

    Google Scholar 

  8. Aw ECX (2020) Understanding consumers’ paths to webrooming: A complexity approach. J Retail Consum Serv 53:101991

    Google Scholar 

  9. Awan N, Ali A, Khan F, Zakarya M, Alturki R, Kundi M, … Haleem M (2021) Modeling dynamic spatio-temporal correlations for urban traffic flows prediction. IEEE Access 9:26502–26511

    Google Scholar 

  10. Babić Rosario A, Sotgiu F, De Valck K, Bijmolt TH (2016) The effect of electronic word of mouth on sales: A meta-analytic review of platform, product, and metric factors. J Mark Res 53(3):297–318

    Google Scholar 

  11. Berahmand K, Bouyer A, Samadi N (2018) A new centrality measure based on the negative and positive effects of clustering coefficient for identifying influential spreaders in complex networks. Chaos, Solitons Fractals 110:41–54

    Google Scholar 

  12. Berahmand K, Samadi N, Sheikholeslami SM (2018) Effect of rich-club on diffusion in complex networks. Int J Modern Physics B 32(12):1850142

    Google Scholar 

  13. Berahmand K, Bouyer A, Samadi N (2019) A new local and multidimensional ranking measure to detect spreaders in social networks. Computing 101:1711–1733

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Burton S, Cook LA, Howlett E, Newman CL (2015) Broken halos and shattered horns: overcoming the biasing effects of prior expectations through objective information disclosure. J Acad Mark Sci 43(2):240–256

    Google Scholar 

  15. Byun KAK, Duhan DF, Dass M (2020) The preservation of loyalty halo effects: an investigation of the post-product-recall behavior of loyal customers. J Bus Res 116:163–175

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ceyhan A (2019) The impact of perception related social media marketing applications on consumers’ brand loyalty and purchase intention. EMAJ: Emerg Mark J 9(1):88–100

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Chalkidis I, Kampas D (2019) Deep learning in law: early adaptation and legal word embeddings trained on large corpora. Artif Intell Law 27(2):171–198

    Google Scholar 

  18. Chen YF (2008) Herd behavior in purchasing books online. Comput Hum Behav 24(5):1977–1992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2007.08.004

  19. Chen Y, Xie J (2008) Online consumer review: Word-of-mouth as a new element of marketing communication mix. Manag Sci 54(3):477–491

    Google Scholar 

  20. Chen S, Wang Y, Han S, Lim MK (2021) Evaluation of fresh food logistics service quality using online customer reviews. Int J Log Res Appl:1–17

  21. Cheong JW, Muthaly S, Kuppusamy M, Han C (2020) The study of online reviews and its relationship to online purchase intention for electronic products among the millennials in Malaysia. Asia Pac J Mark Logist 32(7):1519–1538

    Google Scholar 

  22. Chevalier JA, Mayzlin D (2006) The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews. J Mark Res 43(3):345–354

    Google Scholar 

  23. Cortina JM (1993) Interaction, nonlinearity, and multicollinearity: Implications for multiple regression. J Manag 19(4):915–922

    Google Scholar 

  24. Cuesta-Valino P, Gutiérrez-Rodríguez P, García-Henche B (2022) Word of mouth and digitalization in small retailers: Tradition, authenticity, and change. Technol Forecast Soc Change 175:121382

    Google Scholar 

  25. Dai H, Xiao Q, Yan N, Xu X, Tong T (2022) What Influences Online Sales Across Different Types of E-Commerce Platforms. Int J Electron Commer 26(3):311–330

    Google Scholar 

  26. Dawson JF, Richter AW (2006) Probing three-way interactions in moderated multiple regression: development and application of a slope difference test. J Applied Psychology 91(4):917

    Google Scholar 

  27. Delgado-Ballester E, Munuera-Alemán JL (2005) Does brand trust matter to brand equity? J Prod Brand Manag 14(3):187–196

    Google Scholar 

  28. Dong D, Chang HC, Wang T (2017) The CSR green halo effect on the corporate–public communication: an experimental study. Asian J Commun 27(2):213–230

    Google Scholar 

  29. Fan F-L, Xiong J, Li M, Wang G (2021) On interpretability of artificial neural networks: A survey. IEEE Trans Radiation Plasma Med Sci 5(6):741–760

    Google Scholar 

  30. Guo XM, Hao AW, Shang X (2011) Consumer perceptions of brand functions: an empirical study in China. J Consum Mark 28(4):269–279

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ha J, Kim S-W, Faloutsos C, Park S (2015) An analysis on information diffusion through BlogCast in a blogosphere. Inf Sci 290:45–62

    Google Scholar 

  32. Hafizi M, Bagheri M, Sadighi F, Yarmohammadi L (2017) Halo Effect and Students’ Perceptions of Their Teacher's Appearance, Gender, and Proficiency With the focus on the Iranian EFL Teachers. Iran J Educ Sociol 1(3):95–108

    Google Scholar 

  33. Hamer LO (2006) A confirmation perspective on perceived service quality. J Serv Mark 20(4):219–232

    Google Scholar 

  34. Hassenzahl M, Schöbel M, Trautmann T (2008) How motivational orientation influences the evaluation and choice of hedonic and pragmatic interactive products: The role of regulatory focus. Interact Comput 20(4–5):473–479

    Google Scholar 

  35. Hsieh AT, Li CK (2008) The moderating effect of brand image on public relations perception and customer loyalty. Mark Intell Plan 26(1):26–42

    Google Scholar 

  36. Iversen NM, Hem LE (2008) Provenance associations as core values of place umbrella brands: A framework of characteristics. Eur J Mark 42(5/6):603–626

    Google Scholar 

  37. Judge TA, Hurst C (2008) How the rich (and happy) get richer (and happier): relationship of core self-evaluations to trajectories in attaining work success. J Appl Psychol 93(4):849

    Google Scholar 

  38. Kaushik K, Mishra R, Rana NP, Dwivedi YK (2018) Exploring reviews and review sequences on e-commerce platform: A study of helpful reviews on Amazon. In J Retail Consumer Serv 45:21–32

    Google Scholar 

  39. Kim J, Lee J, Ahn J (2016) Reference-dependent preferences on smart phones in South Korea: Focusing on attributes with heterogeneous preference direction. Comput Hum Behav 64:393–400

    Google Scholar 

  40. Kocór M, Worek B (2017) Adult learning–Providing equal opportunities or widening differences? The Polish case. Br J Educ Stud 65(2):239–260

    Google Scholar 

  41. Konuk FA (2019) The influence of perceived food quality, price fairness, perceived value and satisfaction on customers’ revisit and word-of-mouth intentions towards organic food restaurants. J Retail Consum Serv 50:103–110

    Google Scholar 

  42. Kousha K, Thelwall M (2016) Can Amazon. com reviews help to assess the wider impacts of books? J Assoc Inf Sci Technol 67(3):566–581

    Google Scholar 

  43. Kulshreshtha K, Tripathi V, Bajpai N (2017) Impact of brand cues on young consumers’ preference for mobile phones: a conjoint analysis and simulation modelling. J Creative Commun 12(3):205–222

    Google Scholar 

  44. Kümpel AS (2020) The Matthew Effect in social media news use: Assessing inequalities in news exposure and news engagement on social network sites (SNS). Journalism 21(8):1083–1098

    Google Scholar 

  45. Lee DH (2019) The impact of exhibition service quality on general attendees’ satisfaction through distinct mediating roles of perceived value. Asia Pac J Mark Logist 32(3):793–816

    Google Scholar 

  46. Lee MK, Shi N, Cheung CM, Lim KH, Sia CL (2011) Consumer's decision to shop online: The moderating role of positive informational social influence. Inf Manag 48(6):185–191

    Google Scholar 

  47. Leon R-D, Rodríguez-Rodríguez R, Gómez-Gasquet P, Mula J (2020) Business process improvement and the knowledge flows that cross a private online social network: An insurance supply chain case. Inf Process Manag 57(4):102237

    Google Scholar 

  48. Li W, Li Y, Liu W, Wang C (2022) An influence maximization method based on crowd emotion under an emotion-based attribute social network. Inf Process Manag 59(2):102818

    Google Scholar 

  49. Liao CH (2021) The Matthew effect and the halo effect in research funding. J Inf Secur 15(1):101108

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  50. Lien C-H, Wen M-J, Huang L-C, Wu K-L (2015) Online hotel booking: The effects of brand image, price, trust and value on purchase intentions. Asia Pac Manag Rev 20(4):210–218

    Google Scholar 

  51. Liu Y, Li W, Yang C, Wang J (2022) Multi-source detection based on neighborhood entropy in social networks. Sci Rep 12(1):1–12

    Google Scholar 

  52. Loaiza-Ramírez JP, Moreno-Mantilla CE, Reimer T (2022) Do consumers care about companies’ efforts in greening supply chains? Analyzing the role of protected values and the halo effect in product evaluation. Clean Logist Supply Chain 3:100027

    Google Scholar 

  53. Martínez-González JA, Álvarez-Albelo CD (2021) Influence of Site Personalization and First Impression on Young Consumers’ Loyalty to Tourism Websites. Sustainability 13(3):1425

    Google Scholar 

  54. Meng J (2022) The more we know, the more likely we may agree? Telematics Inform 70:101807

    Google Scholar 

  55. Merton RK (1968) The Matthew Effect in Science: The reward and communication systems of science are considered. Sci 159(3810):56–63

    Google Scholar 

  56. Mikolov T, Chen K, Corrado G, Dean J (2013) Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space. arXiv preprint arXiv:1301.3781. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1301.3781

  57. Mishra A, Shukla A, Sharma SK (2021) Psychological determinants of users’ adoption and word-of-mouth recommendations of smart voice assistants. Int J Inf Manag 67:102413

    Google Scholar 

  58. Moro S, Ramos P, Esmerado J, Jalali SMJ (2019) Can we trace back hotel online reviews’ characteristics using gamification features? Int J Inf Manag 44:88–95

    Google Scholar 

  59. Murali S, Pugazhendhi S, Muralidharan C (2016) Modelling and investigating the relationship of after sales service quality with customer satisfaction, retention and loyalty–a case study of home appliances business. J Retail Consum Serv 30:67–83

    Google Scholar 

  60. Nasiri E, Berahmand K, Li Y (2023) Robust graph regularization nonnegative matrix factorization for link prediction in attributed networks. Multimed Tools Appl 82(3):3745–3768

    Google Scholar 

  61. Nunkoo R, Teeroovengadum V, Ringle CM, Sunnassee V (2020) Service quality and customer satisfaction: The moderating effects of hotel star rating. Int J Hosp Manag 91:102414

    Google Scholar 

  62. Ong BS (2011) Online shoppers' perceptions and use of comparison-shopping sites: An exploratory study. J Promot Manag 17(2):207–227

    Google Scholar 

  63. Park D-H, Kim S (2008) The effects of consumer knowledge on message processing of electronic word-of-mouth via online consumer reviews. Electron Commer Res Appl 7(4):399–410

    Google Scholar 

  64. Razak M, Hidayat M, Launtu A, Putra AHPAK, Bahasoan S (2020) Antecedents and consequence of brand management: empirical study of Apple’s brand product. J Asia Bus Stud 14(3):307–322

    Google Scholar 

  65. Rita P, Oliveira T, Farisa A (2019) The impact of e-service quality and customer satisfaction on customer behavior in online shopping. Heliyon 5(10):e02690

    Google Scholar 

  66. Sahoo N, Krishnan R, Duncan G, Callan J (2012) Research note—the halo effect in multicomponent ratings and its implications for recommender systems: The case of yahoo! movies. Inf Syst Res 23(1):231–246

    Google Scholar 

  67. Sanrey C, Bressoux P, Lima L, Pansu P (2021) A new method for studying the halo effect in teachers' judgement and its antecedents: Bringing out the role of certainty. Br J Educ Psychol 91(2):658–675

    Google Scholar 

  68. Saygılı M, Yalçıntekin T (2021) The effect of hedonic value, utilitarian value, and customer satisfaction in predicting repurchase intention and willingness to pay a price premium for smartwatch brands. Manag: J Contemp Manag Issues 26(2):179–195

    Google Scholar 

  69. Sharma SS, Dutta G (2021) SentiDraw: Using star ratings of reviews to develop domain specific sentiment lexicon for polarity determination. Inf Process Manag 58(1):102412

    Google Scholar 

  70. Sine WD, Shane S, Gregorio DD (2003) The halo effect and technology licensing: The influence of institutional prestige on the licensing of university inventions. Manag Sci 49(4):478–496

    Google Scholar 

  71. Van Dusen B, Nissen J (2019) Modernizing use of regression models in physics education research: A review of hierarchical linear modeling. Phys Review Phys Edu Res 15(2):020108

    Google Scholar 

  72. Wan Y (2015) The Matthew effect in social commerce. Electron Mark 25(4):313–324

    Google Scholar 

  73. Wan Y, Ma B, Pan Y (2018) Opinion evolution of online consumer reviews in the e-commerce environment. Electron Commer Res 18(2):291–311

    Google Scholar 

  74. Wang Y, Lo HP, Hui YV (2003) The antecedents of service quality and product quality and their influences on bank reputation: evidence from the banking industry in China. Manag Serv Qual: Int J 13(1):72–83

    Google Scholar 

  75. Wang J-N, Du J, Chiu Y-L (2020) Can online user reviews be more helpful? Evaluating and improving ranking approaches. Inf Manag 57(8):103281

    Google Scholar 

  76. Wattanacharoensil W, La-ornual D (2019) A systematic review of cognitive biases in tourist decisions. Tour Manag 75:353–369

    Google Scholar 

  77. Wen J, Lin Z, Liu X, Xiao SH, Li Y (2021) The interaction effects of online reviews, brand, and price on consumer hotel booking decision making. J Travel Res 60(4):846–859

    Google Scholar 

  78. Wirtz J (2001) Improving the measurement of customer satisfaction: a test of three methods to reduce halo. Manag Serv Qual: Int J 11(2):99–112

    Google Scholar 

  79. Wirtz J (2003) Halo in customer satisfaction measures: The role of purpose of rating, number of attributes and customer involvement. Int J Serv Ind Manag 14(1):96–119

    Google Scholar 

  80. Wirtz J, Bateson JE (1995) An experimental investigation of halo effects in satisfaction measures of service attributes. Int J Serv Ind Manag 6(3):84–102

    Google Scholar 

  81. Woo H (2019) The expanded halo model of brand image, country image and product image in the context of three Asian countries. Asia Pac J Mark Logist 31(4):773–790

    Google Scholar 

  82. Xu H, Luo R, Winnink J, Wang C, Elahi E (2022) A methodology for identifying breakthrough topics using structural entropy. Inf Process Manag 59(2):102862

    Google Scholar 

  83. Yeung RM, Morris J (2001) Food safety risk: Consumer perception and purchase behaviour. Br Food J 103(3):170–187

    Google Scholar 

  84. Yin D, Bond SD, Zhang H (2014) Anxious or angry? Effects of discrete emotions on the perceived helpfulness of online reviews. MIS Q 38(2):539–560

    Google Scholar 

  85. Yu Y, Wang X, Zhong RY, Huang GQ (2016) E-commerce logistics in supply chain management: Practice perspective. Procedia Cirp 52:179–185

    Google Scholar 

  86. Zhang C, Li W, Wei D, Liu Y, Li Z (2022) Network dynamic GCN influence maximization algorithm with leader fake labeling mechanism. IEEE Trans Comput Social Syst:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530903245663

  87. Zhou T, Lu Y, Wang B (2009) The relative importance of website design quality and service quality in determining consumers’ online repurchase behavior. Inf Syst Manag 26(4):327–337

    Google Scholar 

  88. Zhou C, Sun C, Liu Z, Lau F (2015) A C-LSTM neural network for text classification. arXiv preprint arXiv:1511.08630

  89. Zhou Y, Zhu L, Wu C, Huang S, Wang Q (2022) Do the rich grow richer? An empirical analysis of the Matthew effect in an online healthcare community. Electron Commer Res Appl 52:101125

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors declare no conflict of interest and this research was supported by the Chinese National Natural Science Foundation (No. 71871135 and 72271155).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Shugang Li: Conceptualization, Writing - review & editing, Supervision, Funding acquisition. Yanfang Wei: Data curation, Methodology, Software, Investigation, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing. Zhaoxu Yu: Writing - review & editing, Supervision.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yanfang Wei.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix 1

Variable

abbreviation

online word-of-mouth

OWM

evaluation score of the product

ESP

willingness to buy or recommend the product

WBRP

brand reputation of product

BRP

perceived hedonic value of product

PHVP

frequency that consumer bought products of the same brand

FBSB

the number of product reviews

NPR

perceived service quality

PSQ

Appendix 2

The pseudocode of sentiment analysis:

figure a

The pseudocode for semantic similarity analysis:

figure b

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, S., Wei, Y. & Yu, Z. Research on the influence mechanism of key halo effect and Matthew effect on product online word-of-mouth: considering the moderating role of online store service quality. Multimed Tools Appl 83, 13045–13072 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-023-16124-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-023-16124-z

Keywords

Navigation