Skip to main content
Log in

Conducting individualised hand therapy evaluation with around-device hand movements

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Office workers often resort to therapeutic systems to address muscular and nerve disorders caused by poor gestures and extraordinary workloads. These systems deliver effective treatment with a playable experience. However, the therapeutic evaluation still heavily relies on occupational therapists’ diagnose, which is time-consuming and subjective. This highlights the necessity for a system that adheres to standard treatment protocols and enables individualised therapeutic evaluations. In this study, we proposed a hand therapy system based on around-device hand movements with a capacitive-sensing mobile phone case to realise instant yet approximate hand therapy evaluation. Moreover, we conducted empirical studies to investigate the usability and acceptability of this system and its potential influence on office workers’ willingness to take hand therapy exercises during working hours. The results showed that this instant yet approximate evaluation system can significantly improve the workers’ hand therapy frequencies during working intervals. Furthermore, it can quantitatively measure and report on individual therapy performances, helping office workers understand their therapy outcomes and promoting their willingness to take therapeutic hand exercises. Our results introduce a new perspective for designing mobile systems for well-being.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are not publicly available because the current datasets contain privacy information such as participant facial images that are not fully anonymised but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Algar L, Valdes K (2014) Using smartphone applications as hand therapy interventions. J Hand Ther 27(3):254–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Appelboom G et al (2014) Smart wearable body sensors for patient self-assessment and monitoring. Arch Public Health 72(1):28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Beatty AL, Fukuoka Y, Whooley MA (2013) Using mobile technology for cardiac rehabilitation: a review and framework for development and evaluation. J Am Heart Assoc 2(6):e000568

  4. Brooke J (1996) SUS-A quick and dirty usability scale. Usability Eval Ind 189:194

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cambo SA, Avrahami D, Lee ML (2017) BreakSense: combining physiological and location sensing to promote mobility during work-breaks. In: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp 3595–3607

  6. Case LE (2015) Physical Therapy and Orthotic Devices. Muscular Dystrophy. Springer, pp 73–104

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Chang C-Y et al (2012) Towards pervasive physical rehabilitation using Microsoft Kinect. In: 2012 6th international conference on pervasive computing technologies for healthcare (PervasiveHealth) and workshops. IEEE, pp 159–162

  8. Cheng J et al (2016) Smart-surface: Large scale textile pressure sensors arrays for activity recognition. Pervasive Mob Comput 30:97–112

  9. Cooke ME, Duncan SF (2017) History of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. Carpal Tunnel Syndrome and Related Median Neuropathies. Springer, pp 7–11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. van Dantzig S, Geleijnse G, van Halteren AT (2013) Toward a persuasive mobile application to reduce sedentary behavior. Pers Ubiquit Comput 17(6):1237–1246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Daponte P et al (2013) State of the art and future developments of measurement applications on smartphones. Measurement 46(9):3291–3307

  12. Giannini F et al (2002) A new clinical scale of carpal tunnel syndrome: validation of the measurement and clinical-neurophysiological assessment. Clin Neurophysiol 113(1):71–77

  13. Goyal S, Cafazzo JA (2013) Mobile phone health apps for diabetes management: current evidence and future developments. QJM 106(12):1067–1069

  14. Graves LE et al (2010) The physiological cost and enjoyment of Wii Fit in adolescents, young adults, and older adults. J Phys Act Health 7(3):393–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Grosse-Puppendahl T et al (2017) Finding common ground: A survey of capacitive sensing in human-computer interaction. In: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp 3293–3315

  16. Henkemans OAB et al (2017) Design and evaluation of a personal robot playing a self-management education game with children with diabetes type 1. Int J Hum Comput Stud 106:63–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jarus T, Shavit S, Ratzon N (2000) From hand twister to mind twister: computer-aided treatment in traumatic wrist fracture. Am J Occup Ther 54(2):176–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kisner C, Colby LA, Borstad J (2017) Therapeutic exercise: foundations and techniques. Fa Davis, p 19

  19. Kjeken I et al (2011) Systematic review of design and effects of splints and exercise programs in hand osteoarthritis. Arthritis Care Res 63(6):834–848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kranz M et al (2013) The mobile fitness coach: Towards individualized skill assessment using personalized mobile devices. Pervasive Mob Comput 9(2):203–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Laflamme S et al (2013) Robust flexible capacitive surface sensor for structural health monitoring applications. J Eng Mech 139(7):879–885

  22. Laflamme S et al (2012) Soft capacitive sensor for structural health monitoring of large‐scale systems. Struct Control Health Monit 19(1):70–81

  23. Le HV et al. (2016) Finger placement and hand grasp during smartphone interaction. in Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM

  24. Le HV et al. (2017) Interaction methods and use cases for a full-touch sensing smartphone. in Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM

  25. Lee H et al (2013) Smart pose: mobile posture-aware system for lowering physical health risk of smartphone users. In: CHI'13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp 2257–2266

  26. Lohse K et al (2013) Video games and rehabilitation: using design principles to enhance engagement in physical therapy. J Neurol Phys Ther 37(4):166–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Meijer HA et al (2018) Systematic review on the effects of serious games and wearable technology used in rehabilitation of patients with traumatic bone and soft tissue injuries. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 99(9):1890–1899

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Miyamoto H et al (2014) Carpal tunnel syndrome: diagnosis by means of median nerve elasticity—improved diagnostic accuracy of US with sonoelastography. Radiology 270(2):481–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Mousavi Hondori H, Khademi M (2014) A review on technical and clinical impact of microsoft kinect on physical therapy and rehabilitation. J Med Eng 2014:846514

  30. Musić J, Murray-Smith R (2016) Nomadic input on mobile devices: the influence of touch input technique and walking speed on performance and offset modeling. Hum Comput Interact 31(5):420–471

  31. Nielsen J (1993) Usability engineering. AP Professional, Boston, p 1

  32. O’Brien HL, Toms EG (2013) Examining the generalizability of the User Engagement Scale (UES) in exploratory search. Inf Process Manage 49(5):1092–1107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Palmer M et al (2018) The effectiveness of smoking cessation, physical activity/diet and alcohol reduction interventions delivered by mobile phones for the prevention of non-communicable diseases: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials. PloS one 13(1):e0189801

  34. Pereira MF et al (2020) Application of AR and VR in hand rehabilitation: A systematic review. J Biomed Inform 111:103584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Pourahmadi MR et al (2017) Reliability and concurrent validity of a new iP hone® goniometric application for measuring active wrist range of motion: a cross-sectional study in asymptomatic subjects. J Anat 230(3):484–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Qi B, Banerjee S (2016) GonioSense: a wearable-based range of motion sensing and measurement system for body joints: poster. In: Proceedings of the 22nd Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, pp 441–442

  37. Reid S, Egan B (2019) The validity and reliability of DrGoniometer, a smartphone application, for measuring forearm supination. J Hand Ther 32(1):110–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Sato M, Poupyrev I, Harrison C (2012) Touché: enhancing touch interaction on humans, screens, liquids, and everyday objects. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp 483–492

  39. Short N et al (2017) Use of Dexteria application to improve fine motor coordination in the nondominant hand. J Hand Ther 30(1):106–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Takata SC, Wade ET, Roll SC (2019) Hand therapy interventions, outcomes, and diagnoses evaluated over the last 10 years: A mapping review linking research to practice. J Hand Ther 32(1):1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Torres A, López G, Guerrero L (2015) Making the Physical Therapy Entertaining. In: Bravo J, Hervás R, Villarreal V (eds) Ambient Intelligence for Health: First International Conference, Am IHEALTH 2015, Puerto Varas, Chile, December 1–4, 2015, Proceedings. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 148–154

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  42. Torres A, López G, Guerrero LA (2016) Using non-traditional interfaces to support physical therapy for knee strengthening. J Med Syst 40(9):194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Valdes K et al (2020) Use of mobile applications in hand therapy. J Hand Ther 33(2):229–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Valdes K, Marik T (2010) A systematic review of conservative interventions for osteoarthritis of the hand. J Hand Ther 23(4):334–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Wainwright SF et al (2011) Factors that influence the clinical decision making of novice and experienced physical therapists. Phys Ther 91(1):87–101

  46. Zheng Y-L et al (2014) Unobtrusive sensing and wearable devices for health informatics. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 61(5):1538–1554

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research work is co-supported by the project of Zhejiang provincial key R&D program (ref no 2022C03103), national natural science foundation of China (ref no 61972346), and the major research plan of the national natural science foundation of China (ref no 92148205).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kailin Yin.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

The authors declare there is no conflict of interest in the submission of this manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 57.1 KB)

Supplementary file2 (PDF 53.3 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, X., Yin, K., Shen, S. et al. Conducting individualised hand therapy evaluation with around-device hand movements. Multimed Tools Appl 83, 12687–12704 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-023-16099-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-023-16099-x

Keywords

Navigation