Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

An energy-efficient heterogeneous data gathering for sensor-based internet of things

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Data gathering in the Sensor-Based Internet of Things is done in the midst of many constraints such as high in-network transmissions, uneven load distribution, high energy depletion, and data heterogeneity. Interestingly, compressed sensing based solutions for heterogeneous data gathering have been widely used to resolve these issues but remain unexplored for Sensor Based Internet of Things. Therefore, with the aim of optimizing the in-network transmissions and achieving uniform load distribution in the network, this work presents a novel compressed sensing based algorithm for heterogeneous data gathering in sensor-based Internet of Things. A random markov model is used to obtain co-relation-based segregation of the region of interest, followed by a novel compressed sensing based sampling and data gathering scheme. Simulation results are obtained for two different scenarios by varying the sink position with respect to the region of interest. Comparative analysis, with state of the art methods, proves the efficacy of the proposed scheme over existing methods where the proposed scheme achieves an improved performance of 81% and 44% for network lifetime and average energy consumption respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Algorithm 1
Algorithm 2
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Al-Hourani A, Kandeepan S, Lardner S (2014) Optimal lap altitude for maximum coverage. IEEE Wireless Commun Lett 3(6):569–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bhattacharjee D, Acharya T, Chakravarty S (2021) Energy efficient data gathering in iot networks with heterogeneous traffic for remote area surveillance applications: a cross layer approach. IEEE Trans Green Commun Netw 5 (3):1165–1178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dong S, Sarem M, Zhou W (2020) Distributed data gathering algorithm based on spanning tree. IEEE Syst J 15(1):289–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Donoho DL (2006) Compressed sensing. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 52 (4):1289–1306

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Haghi Kashani M, Rahmani AM, Jafari Navimipour N (2020) Quality of service-aware approaches in fog computing. Int J Commun Syst 33(8):4340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hülsmann J, Traub J, Markl V (2020) Demand-based sensor data gathering with multi-query optimization. Proc VLDB Endowment 13(12):2801–2804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jain N, Bohara VA, Gupta A (2018) ideg: integrated data and energy gathering framework for practical wireless sensor networks using compressive sensing. IEEE Sensors J 19(3):1040–1051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kashani MH, Madanipour M, Nikravan M, Asghari P, Mahdipour E (2021) A systematic review of iot in healthcare: applications, techniques, and trends. J Netw Comput Appl 192:103164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kashani MH, Mahdipour E (2022) Load balancing algorithms in fog computing:a systematic review. IEEE Trans Services Comput

  10. Kathuria M, Gambhir S (2021) Reliable packet transmission in wban with dynamic and optimized qos using multi-objective lion cooperative hunt optimizer. Multimed Tools Appl 80(7):10533–10576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kovtun V, Izonin I, Gregus M (2022) Formalization of the metric of parameters for quality evaluation of the subject-system interaction session in the 5g-iot ecosystem. Alexandria Eng J 61(10):7941–7952

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kovtun V, Izonin I, Greguš M (2022) Model of information system communication in aggressive cyberspace: reliability, functional safety, economics. IEEE Access 10:31494–31502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kovtun V, Izonin I, Gregus M (2022) The functional safety assessment of cyber-physical system operation process described by markov chain. Sci Rep 12(1):1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Liu R-S, Chen Y-C (2020) Robust data collection for energy-harvesting wireless sensor networks. Comput Netw 167:107025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mehta D, Saxena S (2020) Hierarchical wsn protocol with fuzzy multi-criteria clustering and bio-inspired energy-efficient routing (fmcb-er). Multimed Tools Appl:1–34

  16. Nayyar A, Singh R (2020) Ieemarp-a novel energy efficient multipath routing protocol based on ant colony optimization (aco) for dynamic sensor networks. Multimed Tools Appl 79(47):35221–35252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ren D, Li X, Zhou Z (2021) Energy-efficient sensory data gathering in iot networks with mobile edge computing. Peer-to-Peer Netw Appl 14 (6):3959–3970

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Salim A, Osamy W, Aziz A, Khedr AM (2022) Seedgt: secure and energy efficient data gathering technique for iot applications based wsns. J Netw Comput Appl 202:103353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Shivhare A, Singh VK, Kumar M (2020) Anticomplementary triangles for efficient coverage in sensor network-based iot. IEEE Syst J 14(4):4854–4863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Singh VK, Kumar M (2018) A compressed sensing approach to resolve the energy hole problem in large scale wsns. Wirel Pers Commun 99(1):185–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Singh VK, Kumar M, Verma S (2017) Accurate detection of important events in wsns. IEEE Syst J 13(1):248–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Singh VK, Nathani B, Kumar M (2019) Weed-mc: wavelet transform for energy efficient data gathering and matrix completion. IEEE Trans Parallel Distr Syst 31(5):1066–1073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Suman J, Shyamala K, Roja G (2021) Improving network lifetime in wsn’s based on maximum residual energy. In: 2021 2nd International conference for emerging technology (INCET). IEEE, pp 1–5

  24. Tan HO, Korpeoglu I, Stojmenovi I (2010) Computing localized power-efficient data aggregation trees for sensor networks. IEEE Trans Parallel Distr Syst 22(3):489–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Tomar MS, Shukla PK (2019) Energy efficient gravitational search algorithm and fuzzy based clustering with hop count based routing for wireless sensor network. Multimed Tools Appl 78(19):27849–27870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Tommasi F, De Luca V, Melle C (2021) Qos monitoring in real-time streaming overlays based on lock-free data structures. Multimed Tools Appl 80 (14):20929–20970

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Velpula P, Pamula R (2021) Ebgo: an optimal load balancing algorithm, a solution for existing tribulation to balance the load efficiently on cloud servers. Multimed Tools Appl:1–23

  28. Zheng H, Guo W, Xiong N (2017) A kernel-based compressive sensing approach for mobile data gathering in wireless sensor network systems. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst 48(12):2315–2327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zheng H, Yang F, Tian X, Gan X, Wang X, Xiao S (2014) Data gathering with compressive sensing in wireless sensor networks: a random walk based approach. IEEE Trans Parallel Distr Syst 26(1):35–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Wireless Communications and Analytics Research Lab, Department of Computer Science, Indian Institute of Information Technology, CG City, Lucknow, 226002, Uttar Pradesh, India

    Gaurav Tripathi & Vishal Krishna Singh

  2. Department of Computer Science, Pranveer Singh Insitute of Technology, Kanpur, 209305, Uttar Pradesh, India

    Brijesh Kumar Chaurasia

Authors
  1. Gaurav Tripathi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Vishal Krishna Singh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Brijesh Kumar Chaurasia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gaurav Tripathi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interests

The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tripathi, G., Singh, V.K. & Chaurasia, B.K. An energy-efficient heterogeneous data gathering for sensor-based internet of things. Multimed Tools Appl 82, 42593–42616 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-023-15161-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-023-15161-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation