Skip to main content
Log in

Marksmanship evaluation using image processing techniques

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Performance in marksmanship necessitates precision and undivided concentration. It entails firing bullets at targets using a firearm. According to the research conducted, marksmanship accuracy is influenced by several factors, including gender, country’s region, handedness, firearm type, clothing, and weather conditions. This paper presents a novel approach to determining the factors that influence the shooting accuracy of a trainee during shooting practice. This study used Image Processing techniques to determine and evaluate a marksman’s skill level and performance based on selected listed characteristics. During several live-fire exercises at the outdoor shooting range, 242 images of Figure-11 targets fired at by trainees with AK-47 rifles were obtained from the Nigerian Defence Academy (NDA) and Nigerian Army School of Infantry (NASI). The images were further divided into classes using the selected characteristics. NDA was classified into handedness, gender, country’s region, and weather conditions. While NASI on the other hand was classified into country’s regions, this was because of the only available data during image capture. Shooting accuracy was calculated by analysing the bullet on the figure-11 target using an image processing approach. Experimental results revealed that the Female trainee had 56% shooting accuracy, as against the male trainee with a 44% rate. In terms of weather conditions, the study showed that trainees recorded better shooting accuracy of 66% when there was no rain, compared to 34% when there was rain. The study also showed that the trainee’s country’s region and handedness were consistent with no significant difference. The proposed technique will provide a cheap alternative to the military institution for trainee shooting practice. The study revealed that there is a need for regular shooting exercises under varied weather conditions. The study also suggests that the mode of training be designed in such a way that it involves constant shooting practice with longer hours and the use of more shooting rounds with live fire.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27
Fig. 28
Fig. 29
Fig. 30
Fig. 31
Fig. 32
Fig. 33
Fig. 34

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anglin KM (2018) Identifying criteria to predict army rifle marksmanship proficiency, Doctor of Philosophy Phd Dissertations And Master’s Theses, College of Arts & Sciences, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University. [Online]. Available: https://commons.erau.edu/edt/448/. Accessed 7 June 2020

  2. Atherton TJ, Kerbyson DJ (1999) Size invariant circle detection. Image Vis Comput 17 (11):795–803. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0262-8856(98)00160-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bansal M, Kumar M, Leoa M, Kumar M (2004) 2D object recognition: a comparative analysis of SIFT, SURF and ORB feature descriptors. Multimedia Tools and Applications 80(12):18839–18857. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-021-10646-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Blink MJ, Carmichael T, Murphy J, Eagle M (2018) Predictive Models of User Performance for Marksmanship Training. In: The thirty-first international florida artificial intelligence research society conference (FLAIRS-31), Florida: Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (www.aaai.org)., pp 439–442

  5. Brown SAT, Mitchell KB (2017) Shooting stability: a critical component of marksmanship performance as measured through aim path and trigger control. Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc Annu 61(1):1476–1480. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931213601854

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chittock A (2016) Getty Images. https://www.gettyimages.com/detail/photo/ak-47-royalty-free-image/182717773?adppopup=true. Accessed 17 December 2020

  7. Choi HJ, Mitchell KB, Garlie T, McNamara J (2016) Effects of body armor fit on marksmanship performance. In: Applied human factors and ergonomics (AHFE) conference, Orlando, Florida. Springer International Publishing Switzerland, pp 341–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41694-6_35

  8. Chung GKWK, Delacruz GC, Vries LFd, Bewley WL, Baker EL (2006) New directions in rifle marksmanship research. Mil Psychol 18(2):161–179. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327876mp1802_5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chung GKWK, Nagashima SO, Delacruz GC, Lee JJ, Wainess R, Baker EL (2011) Review of rifle marksmanship training research

  10. Ciavarelli A, Platte WL, Powers JJ, Johnny M (2009) Teaching and assessing complex skills in simulation with application to rifle marksmanship training. In: Interservice/industry training, simulation, and education conference, Orlando, FL, 01 December 2009 2009, Orlando, FL: Interservice /Industry Training, Simulation, and Education Conference (I/ITSEC), pp 1–10

  11. Deng S, Liu DM, Hsieh SL (2011) Applying machine learning methods to the shooting accuracy prediction: a case study of T-75 Pistol SHooting. Inf Technol J 10(8):1508–1517. https://doi.org/10.3923/itj.2011.1508.1517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Djekoune AO, Messaoudi K, Belhocine M (2013) A new modified hough transform method for circle detection, presented at the 5th International Joint Conference on Computational Intelligence (ECTA-2013)IJCCI Vilamoura, Algarve, Portugal

  13. Fedaravicius A, Pilkauskas K, Slizys E, Survila A (2019) Research and development of training pistols for laser shooting simulation system. Defence Technology 16(2020):530–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dt.2019.06.018

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gee D (2017) The first ambush? effects of army training and employment, London

  15. Gonzalez RC, Woods RE (2008) Digital Image Processing. Pearson Education, India

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gregory KWKC et al (2004) Determinants of rifle marksmanship performance: predicting shooting performance with advanced distributed learning assessments. University of California, Los Angeles 30-06-2006

  17. Irhebhude ME, Bamidele OD, Ogwueleka FN (2018) An image analysis approach to marksman selection. The IUP Journal of Computer Sciences XII(1):51–63. 27 January, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3220904

    Google Scholar 

  18. Irhebhude ME, Nawahda A, Edirisinghe EA (2016) View invariant vehicle type recognition and counting system using multiple features. Int J Comput Vis Signal Proc 6(1):20–32

    Google Scholar 

  19. Irhebhude ME, Shabi M, Kolawole A (2019) Streetlight Objects Recognition by Region and histogram features in an autonomous vehicle system. European J Appl Sci 7(5):30–42. https://doi.org/10.21917/ijivp.2019.0292

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jansson V, Pettersson M (2019) Predicting rifle shooting accuracy from context and sensor data bachelor of science thesis. Engineering, Jonkoping University School of Engineering. [Online]. Available: http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A1338697&dswid=-5034

  21. Johnson RF, Merullo DJ (1996) Effects of caffeine and gender on vigilance and marksmanship. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 40(23):1217–1221. https://doi.org/10.1177/154193129604002315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kawaguchi T, Hidaka D, Rizon M (2000) Detection of eyes from human faces by Hough transform and separability filter. In: International conference on image processing, vancouver, BC, Canada, 10-13 Sept. 2000, Proceedings 2000 International Conference on Image Processing (Cat. No.00CH37101): IEEE, 2000, pp 49–52, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIP.2000.900889

  23. Kemnitz CP, Johnson RF, Merullo DJ, Rice VJ (2001) Relation of rifle stock length and weight to military rifle marksmanship performance by men and women. Percept Mot skills 93(2):479–485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Last WM, Smol JP (2001) Image analysis techniques in tracking environmental change using lake sediments: physical and geochemical methods, vol 2, Netherlands, Kluwer Academic Publishers

  25. Lawson BD, Ranes BM, Thompson L-BI (2016) Smooth moves:Shooting performance is related to efficiency of rifle movement. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 60(1):1524–1528. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931213601350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lin Z, Wu S (2012) The design and implementation of shooting training and intelligent evaluation system. pp 107–115

  27. Ma Z, Fang L, Wang C (2014) Research of weapon training simulator software model based on UML. Appl Mech Mater 599–601:1625–1628. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.599-601.1625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Maier T, Meister D, Trösch S, Wehrlin JP (2018) Predicting biathlon shooting performance using machine learning. J Sports Sci, pp 1–7

  29. Mingzhu Z, Huanrong C (2008) A New Method Of Circle’s Center And Radius Detection In Image Processing, presented at the IEEE International Conference on Automation and Logistics, Qingdao, China

  30. Mitchell KB, Bossi L, Harper W, Larkin G, McNamara J, Palmer C (2016) Marksmanship as a critical military occupational task:Issues, approaches and methods for optimal performance and equipment design. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 60 (1):2058–2062. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931213601467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Monika M, Kumar M (2021) Kumar XGBoost: 2D-Object Recognition Using Shape Descriptors and Extreme Gradient Boosting Classifier. Springer, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  32. Mu-xin W, Yong W, Hai-gen Y, Xiao-ping L, Wei-gang X (2018) Design of simulation training system of self-propelled gun based on virtual reality. Presented at the 2018 5th International Conference on Information Science and Control Engineering, (ICISCE), Zhengzhou

  33. Nagashima SO, Chung GKWK, Espinosa PD, Berka C, Baker EL (2009) Assesment of rifle marksmanship skill using sensor-based measures

  34. NDA (2002) Nigerian defence academy weapon training, p 184

  35. Orazioa TD , Guaragnellab C, Leoa M, Distantea A (2004) A new algorithm for ball recognition using circle hough transform and neural classifier. The Journal of Pattern Recognition Society 37(3):393–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-3203(03)00228-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Parama DW, Hendra K, Muhammad A (2019) Automatic shooting scoring system based on image processing. J Phys Conf Ser 1201:012047. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1201/1/012047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Petrou M, Bosdogianni P (1999) Image Processing The fundamentals, 1s edn. John Wiley & sons, LTD, p 333

  38. Rizon M, Yazid H, Saad P, Ali Yeon MS, Abdul Rahman S (2005) Object detection using circular hough transform. Am J Appl Sci 2(12):1606–1609. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajassp.2005.1606.1609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Thi TZ, Ikuo O, Takuya S, Shingo A, Hitoshi W, Hiroshi S (2013) Image processing approach to automatic scoring system for archery targets. In: 2013 Ninth international conference on intelligent information hiding and multimedia signal processing, Beijing, China: IEEE Computer Society, pp 259–262, https://doi.org/10.1109/IIH-MSP.2013.73

  40. UKEssays (2020) Difference between digital image processing and digital image analysis https://www.ukessays.com/essays/information-technology/difference-between-digital-image-processing-and-digital-image-analysis.php (accessed 30 July)

  41. Walia S, Kumar K, Kumar M, Gao S (2021) Fusion of handcrafted and deep features for forgery detection in digital images. IEEE 9:99742–997559. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3096240

    Google Scholar 

  42. Wilson A. T. (2015) New weapons simulator helps refine marksmanship skills. 633rd Air Base Wing Public Affairs US Airforce. Retrieved 15 November 2020 from https://www.af.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/563018/new-weapons-simulator-helps-refine-marksmanship-skills/

  43. Yuen HK, Princen J, Illingworth J, Kittler J (1990) Comparative Study of Hough Transform Methods for Circle Finding. Image Vis Comput 8(1):71–77. 10 June, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/0262-8856(90)90059-E

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Yıldız M, Fidan U (2019) The psychophysiological differences between expert and novice rifle shooters during the aiming period. Pedagogics psychology, medicalbiological problems of physical training and sports, pp 313–317

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to appreciate Nigerian Defence Academy and Nigeria Army School of Infantry for the support given during the data gathering stage of this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martins E. Irhebhude.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Irhebhude, M.E., Kolawole, A.O. Marksmanship evaluation using image processing techniques. Multimed Tools Appl 82, 43145–43177 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-023-14462-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-023-14462-6

Keywords

Navigation