Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Neural coordination through spider monkey optimization-guided weight synchronization

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper proposes a Spider Monkey-based neural weight optimization approach for quicker neural synchronization. To exchange the session key across a public channel, two Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) are synchronized through reciprocating learning. The most crucial feature of ANN coordination is evaluating how effectively sender and receiver’s ANNs coordinate without the other’s weights. Traditional algorithms have a latency in assessing coordination, which endangers neuronal coordination’s confidentiality. This research proposes a collaborative learning technique for analyzing the total synchronization of ANNs efficiently and decisively. The frequency at which the two ANNs got the same outcome in previous iterations determines synchronization. The hash is being used to evaluate if all ANNs are better aligned when a certain threshold is met. The presented technique uses the hash value of the synaptic weights to achieve complete synchronization among two communicating parties. This approach offers a number of benefits, namely (1) the usage of a Spider Monkey-based PRNG optimization to obtain the optimal weight vector. (2) The suggested method, in contrast to earlier methodologies, allows two communicating entities to discover complete collaboration more rapidly. (3) The probability of success is lowered geometrically. (4) The proposed TLTPM coordination periods are significantly quicker than the present CVTPM, VVTPM, and TPM-FPGA approaches. The suggested method improves the security of the neural key exchange protocol. The proposed approach is tested, and the findings reveal that it outperforms similar techniques currently in use.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Algorithm 1
Algorithm 2
Algorithm 3
Algorithm 4
Algorithm 5
Algorithm 6
Fig. 2
Algorithm 7
Fig. 3
Algorithm 8
Fig. 4
Algorithm 9
Algorithm 10
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abdalrdha Z K, AL-Qinani I H, Abbas F N (2019) Subject Review : key Generation in Different Cryptography Algorithm. Int J Sci Res Sci Eng Technol 6(5):230–240. https://doi.org/10.32628/ijsrset196550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chourasia S, Bharadwaj H C, Das Q, Agarwal K, Lavanya K (2019) Vectorized neural key exchange using tree parity machine. Secur Commun Netw 2021:3140–3145. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6680782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dolecki M, Kozera R (2015) The Impact of the TPM Weights Distribution on Network Synchronization Time. In: Saeed K., Homenda W. (eds) Computer information systems and industrial management. CISIM 2015. Lecture notes in computer science(). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24369-6_37, vol 9339. Springer, Cham

  4. Dong T, Huang T (2020) Neural Cryptography Based on Complex-Valued Neural Network. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst 31(11):4999–5004. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2019.2955165

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. ÉDgar Salguero Dorokhin, Fuertes W, Lascano E (2019) On the Development of an Optimal Structure of Tree Parity Machine for the Establishment of a Cryptographic Key. Secur Commun Netw 2019:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/8214681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gao J, Yang X, Jiang Y, Song H, Choo K K R, Sun J (2021) Semantic Learning Based Cross-Platform Binary Vulnerability Search For IoT Devices. IEEE Trans Ind Inf 17(2):971–979. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2019.2947432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hadke P P, Kale S G (2016) Use of neural networks in cryptography: a review. In: World conference on futuristic trends in research and innovation for social welfare (startup conclave), Coimbatore, India, 2016, pp 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/STARTUP.2016.7583925

  8. Hazrati G, Bansal J C, Evolutionary and Swarm Intelligence Algorithms (2019) Spider Monkey Optimization Algorithm. In: J B, P S, N P (eds) Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 779. Springer, Cham, DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91341-4_4

  9. Jeong S, Park C, Hong D, Seo C, Jho N (2021) Neural Cryptography Based on Generalized Tree Parity Machine for Real-Life Systems. Secur Commun Netw. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6680782

  10. Jo M, Jangirala S, Das A K, Li X, Khan M K (2020) Designing Anonymous Signature-Based Authenticated Key Exchange Scheme for IoT-Enabled Smart Grid Systems. IEEE Trans Ind Inf. 1–1 https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2020.3011849

  11. Kanter I, Kinzel W, Kanter E (2002) Secure exchange of information by synchronization of neural networks. Europhys Lett (EPL) 57(1):141–147. https://doi.org/10.1209/epl/i2002-00552-9

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Kanter I, Kinzel W, Kanter E (2002) Secure exchange of information by synchronization of neural networks. Europhys Lett (EPL) 57(1):141–147. https://doi.org/10.1209/epl/i2002-00552-9

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Karakaya B, Gülten A, Frasca M (2019) A true random bit generator based on a memristive chaotic circuit: Analysis, design and FPGA implementation. Chaos Solitons Fractals 119:143–149

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Liu L, Miao S, Hu H, Deng Y (2016) Pseudo-random bit generator based on non-stationary logistic maps. IET Inf Secur 10:87–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Liu P, Zeng Z, Wang J (2019) Global synchronization of coupled fractional-order recurrent neural networks. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst 30(8):2358–2368

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Lu Y, Huang X, Dai Y, Maharjan S, Zhang Y (2020) Blockchain and Federated Learning for Privacy-Preserved Data Sharing in Industrial IoT. IEEE Trans Ind Inf 16(6):4177–4186. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2019.2942190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Makkar A, Garg S, Kumar N, Hossain M S, Ghoneim A, Alrashoud M (2021) An Efficient Spam Detection Technique for IoT Devices Using Machine Learning. IEEE Trans Ind Inf 17(2):903–912. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2020.2968927

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mehic M, Niemiec H, Siljak M, Voznak (2020) Error reconciliation in quantum key distribution protocols. In: Ulidowski I, Lanese I, Schultz U, Ferreira C (eds) Reversible computation: extending horizons of computing. RC 2020. Lecture notes in computer science(), vol 12070. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47361-7_11

  19. Niemiec (2019) Error correction in quantum cryptography based on artificial neural networks. Quantum Inf Process 18:174–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11128-019-2296-4

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Niemiec M, Mehic M, Voznak (2018) Security verification of artificial neural networks used to error correction in quantum cryptography. In: 2018 26th Telecommunications Forum (TELFOR), Belgrade, Serbia, pp 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/TELFOR.2018.8612006

  21. NIST (2020) NIST Statistical Test. http://csrc.nist.gov/groups/ST/toolkit/rng/stats_tests.html. Accessed 10 March 2021

  22. Pal S K, Mishra S, Mishra S (2019) An TPM based approach for generation of secret key. Int J Comput Netw Inf Secur 11(10):45–50. https://doi.org/10.5815/ijcnis.2019.10.06

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Patidar V, Sud K K, Pareek N K (2009) A pseudo random bit generator based on chaotic logistic map and its statistical testing. Informatica 33:441–452

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Protic D (2016) Neural cryptography. Vojnotehnicki Glas 64(2):483–495. https://doi.org/10.5937/vojtehg64-8877

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Rosen-Zvi M, Kanter I, Kinzel W (2002) Cryptography based on neural networks analytical results. J Phys A Math Gen 35(47):L707–L713. https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/35/47/104

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Ruttor A (2006) Neural synchronization and cryptography. St. Gallen, University of St Gallen

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ruttor A, Kinzel W, Kanter I (2007) Dynamics of neural cryptography. Phys Rev E 75 5. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.75.056104

  28. Ruttor A, Kinzel W, Naeh R, Kanter I (2006) Genetic attack on neural cryptography. Phys Rev E. 73 3 https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.73.036121

  29. Sarkar A (2019) Multilayer neural network synchronized secured session key based encryption in wireless communication. Int J Artif Intell 8(1):44–53. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijeecs.v14.i1.pp169-177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Sarkar A (2021) Deep Learning Guided Double Hidden Layer Neural Synchronization Through Mutual Learning. Neural Process Lett 53:1355–1384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11063-021-10443-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Sarkar A, Mandal JK (2012) Swarm Intelligence based Faster Public-Key Cryptography in Wireless Communication (SIFPKC). Int J Comput Sci Eng Technol (IJCSET) 3(7):267–273

    Google Scholar 

  32. Shacham L N, Klein E, Mislovaty R, Kanter I, Kinzel W (2004) Cooperating attackers in neural cryptography. Phys Rev E. 69 6 https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.69.066137

  33. Shishniashvili E, Mamisashvili L, Mirtskhulava L (2020) Enhancing IoT Security Using Multi-Layer Feedforward Neural Network with Tree Parity Machine Elements. Int J Simul Syst Sci Technol 21(2):371–383. https://doi.org/10.5013/ijssst.a.21.02.37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Teodoro A, Gomes OSM, Saadi M, et al. (2021) An FPGA-Based Performance Evaluation of Artificial Neural Network Architecture Algorithm for IoT. . Wireless Personal Communications https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-021-08566-1

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author expressed deep gratitude for the moral and congenial atmosphere support provided by the DBT STAR college scheme of Ramakrishna Mission Vidyamandira, Belur Math, India.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Science and Electronics, Ramakrishna Mission Vidyamandira, Belur Math, Howrah, 711202, West Bengal, India

    Arindam Sarkar

Authors
  1. Arindam Sarkar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arindam Sarkar.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sarkar, A. Neural coordination through spider monkey optimization-guided weight synchronization. Multimed Tools Appl 82, 33577–33606 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-023-14443-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-023-14443-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation