Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

ML-MDS: Machine Learning based Misbehavior Detection System for Cognitive Software-defined Multimedia VANETs (CSDMV) in smart cities

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Security is a major concern in vehicular networks for reliable communication between the source and the destination in smart cities. Data, these days, is in the form of safety or non-safety messages in formats like text, audio, images, video, etc. These information exchanges between the two parties need to be updated with a trust value (TV) by analyzing the communication data. In this paper, a machine learning-based misbehavior detection system (ML-MDS) is proposed for cognitive software-defined multimedia vehicular networks (CSDMV) in smart cities. In the proposed system, before communication, the vehicle must be aware of the TV of other vehicles. If the TV for a vehicle is higher than a threshold (th), then the communication happens and the whole transaction information is sent to the local software-defined network controller (LSDNC) for classification of behavior using the ML algorithm. After this, the TV is updated as per the last transaction status at LSDNC and the updated TV of the vehicle is sent to the main SDN controller for information gathering. In this system, the best ML algorithm for the ML-MDS model is selected by considering decision tree, support vector machine (SVM), neural network (NN), and logistic regression (LR) algorithms. The classification accuracy performance is evaluated using UNSW_NB-15 standard dataset for detecting the normal and malicious vehicles. NN shows better classification accuracy than other algorithms. The proposed ML-MDS is implemented and evaluated using OMNeT++ network simulator and the Simulation of Urban Mobility (SUMO) road traffic simulator by considering various parameters such as detection accuracy, detection time, and energy consumption. From the results, it is observed that the detection accuracy of proposed ML-MDS system is 98.4% as compared to Grover et al. scheme which was 80.2%. Also, for scalability issue the dataset size is increased and performance is evaluated in Orange 3.26.0 machine analytics tool and NN is found to be the best algorithm which shows high accuracy in detecting the attackers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data will be available on request.

References

  1. Akbar MS, Khan MS, Khaliq KA, Qayyum A, Yousaf M (2014) Evaluation of IEEE 802.11 n for Multimedia Application in VANET.ANT/SEIT.953–958

  2. Alheeti KMA, Gruebler A, McDonald-Maier KD (2015) An intrusion detection system against black hole attacks on the communication network of self-driving cars. In: sixth international conference on emerging security technologies (EST). IEEE, pp 86–91

  3. Alheeti KMA, Gruebler A, McDonald-Maier KD (2015) On the detection of grey hole and rushing attacks in self-driving vehicular networks. In: 7th Computer Science and Electronic Engineering Conference (CEEC). IEEE, pp 231–236

  4. Arif M, Wang G, Wang T, Peng T (2018)SDN-based secure VANETs communication with fog computing. In: International Conference on Security, Privacy and Anonymity in Computation, Communication and Storage. Springer, Cham, pp 46–59

  5. Bedi P, Jindal V (2014) Use of big data technology in vehicular ad-hoc networks. In: International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics (ICACCI). IEEE, pp 1677–1683

  6. Bhoi SK, Khilar PM (2012) SST: A secure fault-tolerant Smart Transportation system for Vehicular Ad hoc Network. In: 2nd IEEE International Conference on Parallel, Distributed and Grid Computing. IEEE, pp 545–550

  7. Bhoi SK, Khilar PM (2013) Vehicular communication: a survey. IET Netw 3(3):204–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bhoi SK, Khilar PM (2014) SIR: a secure and intelligent routing protocol for vehicular ad hoc network. IET Netw 4(3):185–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bhoi SK, Khilar PM (2016) Self soft fault detection based routing protocol for vehicular ad hoc network in city environment. Wirel Netw 22(1):285–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bhoi S, Kumar et al (2022) IoT-EMS: An internet of things based environment monitoring system in volunteer computing environment. Intell Autom SOFT Comput 32(3):1493–1507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bhoi SK, Nayak RP, Dash D, Rout JP (2013) RRP: A robust routing protocol for Vehicular Ad Hoc Network against hole generation attack. In: International Conference on Communication and Signal Processing. IEEE, pp 1175–1179

  12. Boeira F, Barcellos MP, de Freitas EP, Vinel A, Asplund M (2017) Effects of colluding Sybil nodes in message falsification attacks for vehicular platooning. In: IEEE Vehicular Networking Conference (VNC). IEEE, pp 53–60

  13. Da Cunha FD, Boukerche A, Villas L, Viana AC, Loureiro AA (2014) Data communication in VANETs: a survey, challenges and applications, vol 44, pp 90–103

  14. Garg S, Singh A, Kaur K, Aujla GS, Batra S, Kumar N, Obaidat MS (2019) Edge computing-based security framework for big data analytics in VANETs. IEEE Netw 33(2):72–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ghaleb FA, Zainal A, Rassam MA, Mohammed F (2017) An effective misbehavior detection model using artificial neural network for vehicular ad hoc network applications. In: IEEE Conference on Application, Information and Network Security (AINS). IEEE, pp 13–18

  16. Grover J, Prajapati NK, Laxmi V, Gaur MS (2011) Machine learning approach for multiple misbehavior detection in VANET. In: International conference on advances in computing and communications. Springer, Berlin, pp 644–653

  17. Gyawali S, Qian Y (2019) Misbehavior detection using machine learning in vehicular communication networks. In: IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC). IEEE, pp 1–6

  18. Gyawali S, Qian Y, Hu RQ (2020) Machine learning and reputation based misbehavior detection in vehicular communication networks. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 69(8):8871–8885

  19. Hasrouny H, Samhat AE, Bassil C, Laouiti A (2007) VANet security challenges and solutions: A survey. Veh Commun 7:7–20

    Google Scholar 

  20. https://orange.biolab.si/. Accessed on May 2020

  21. https://www.unsw.adfa.edu.au/unsw-canberra-cyber/cybersecurity/ADFA-NB15-Datasets/. Accessed on May 2020

  22. Hu H, Lu R, Zhang Z, Shao J (2016) REPLACE: A reliable trust-based platoon service recommendation scheme in VANET. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 66(2):1786–1797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hu H, Lu R, Huang C, Zhang Z (2016) Tripsense: A trust-based vehicular platoon crowdsensing scheme with privacy preservation in vanets. Sensors 16(6):803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kerrache CA, Calafate CT, Cano JC, Lagraa N, Manzoni P (2016) Trust management for vehicular networks: An adversary-oriented overview. IEEE Access 4:9293–9307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kreutz D, Ramos FM, Verissimo PE, Rothenberg CE, Azodolmolky S, Uhlig S (2014)Software-defined networking: A comprehensive survey. In: Proc IEEE 103(1):14–76

  26. Ku I, Lu Y, Gerla M, Gomes RL, Ongaro F, Cerqueira E (2014) Towards software-defined VANET: Architecture and services. 13th annual Mediterranean ad hoc networking workshop (MED-HOC-NET). IEEE, pp 103–110

  27. Kumar N, Chilamkurti N (2014) Collaborative trust aware intelligent intrusion detection in VANETs. Comput Electr Eng 40(6):1981–1996

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lal AS, Nair R (2015) Region authority based collaborative scheme to detect Sybil attacks in VANET. In: International Conference on Control Communication & Computing India (ICCC). IEEE, pp 664–668

  29. Li F, Wang Y (2007) Routing in vehicular ad hoc networks: A survey. IEEE Veh Technol Mag 2(2):12–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Li T, Tian S, Liu A, Liu H, Pei T (2018) DDSV: Optimizing delay and delivery ratio for multimedia big data collection in mobile sensing vehicles. IEEE Internet Things J 5(5):3474–3486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Lyamin N, Vinel A, Jonsson M, Loo J (2013)Real-time detection of denial-of-service attacks in IEEE 802.11 p vehicular networks. IEEE Commun Lett 18(1):110–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Lyamin N, Kleyko D, Delooz Q, Vinel A (2018)AI-based malicious network traffic detection in VANETs. IEEE Netw 32(6):15–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Mahmoudi I, Kamel J, Ben-Jemaa I, Kaiser A, Urien P (2020) Towards a reliable machine learning-based global misbehavior detection in C–ITS: Model evaluation approach. Vehicular Ad-hoc Networks for Smart Cities. Springer, Singapore, pp 73–86

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  34. Marfia G, Roccetti M, Amoroso A, Gerla M, Pau G, Lim JH (2011) Cognitive cars: constructing a cognitive playground for VANET research testbeds. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Cognitive Radio and Advanced Spectrum Management, pp 1–5

  35. Mejri MN, Ben-Othman J, Hamdi M (2014) Survey on VANET security challenges and possible cryptographic solutions. Veh Commun 1(2):53–66

    Google Scholar 

  36. Modha DS, Ananthanarayanan R, Esser SK, Ndirango A, Sherbondy AJ, Singh R (2011) Cognitive computing. Commun ACM 54(8):62–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Moustafa N, Slay J (2015) UNSW-NB15: a comprehensive data set for network intrusion detection systems (UNSW-NB15 network data set). In: military communications and information systems conference (MilCIS). IEEE, pp 1–6

  38. Moustafa N, Slay J (2016) The evaluation of Network Anomaly Detection Systems: Statistical analysis of the UNSW-NB15 data set and the comparison with the KDD99 data set. Inf Secur J: Global Perspective 25(1–3):18–31

    Google Scholar 

  39. Moustafa N, Slay J, Creech G (2017) Novel geometric area analysis technique for anomaly detection using trapezoidal area estimation on large-scale networks. IEEE Trans Big Data 5(4):481–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Moustafa N, Creech G, Slay J (2017) Big data analytics for intrusion detection system: Statistical decision-making using finite dirichlet mixture models. Data analytics and decision support for cybersecurity. Springer, Cham, pp 127–156

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  41. Olariu S, Khalil I, Abuelela M (2011) Taking VANET to the clouds. Int J Pervasive Comput Commun 7:7–21

  42. Patounas G, Zhang Y, Gjessing S (2015) Evaluating defence schemes against jamming in vehicle platoon networks. In: 18th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems. IEEE, pp 2153–2158

  43. Sahoo K, Sagar et al (2021)Demand-supply based economic model for resource provisioning in industrial IoT traffic. IEEE Internet Things J 9(13):10529–10538

  44. Sakiz F, Sen S (2017) A survey of attacks and detection mechanisms on intelligent transportation systems: VANETs and IoV. Ad Hoc Netw 61:33–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Shafiq H, Rehman RA, Kim BS (2018) Services and security threats in sdn based vanets: A survey. Wirel Commun Mob Comput

  46. Sharshembiev K, Yoo S-M, Elmahdi E (2021) Protocol misbehavior detection framework using machine learning classification in vehicular Ad Hoc networks. Wirel Netw :27(3):2103–2118

  47. Singh PK, Gupta S, Vashistha R, Nandi SK, Nandi S (2019) Machine learning based approach to detect position falsification attack in vanets. In: International Conference on Security & Privacy. Springer, Singapore, pp 166–178

  48. So S, Sharma P, Petit J (2018) Integrating plausibility checks and machine learning for misbehavior detection in VANET. In: 17th IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA). IEEE, pp 564–571

  49. Sommer C, Eckhoff D, Brummer A, Buse DS, Hagenauer F, Joerer S, Segata M (2019) Veins: The open source vehicular network simulation framework. Recent Advances in Network Simulation. Springer, Cham, pp 215–252

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  50. Swain RR, Khilar PM, Bhoi SK (2018) Heterogeneous fault diagnosis for wireless sensor networks. Ad Hoc Netw 69:15–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Truong NB, Lee GM, Ghamri-Doudane Y (2015) Software defined networking-based vehicular adhoc network with fog computing. In: IFIP/IEEE International Symposium on Integrated Network Management (IM). IEEE, pp 1202–1207

  52. Uprety A, Rawat DB, Li J (2021) Privacy preserving misbehavior detection in IoV using federated machine learning. 2021 IEEE 18th Annual Consumer Communications & Networking Conference (CCNC). IEEE

  53. Vitelli D (2016) Security vulnerabilities of vehicular platoon network. University of Naples Federico II Studies, Thesis

  54. Yu Y, Guo L, Liu Y, Zheng J, Zong Y (2018) An efficient SDN-based DDoS attack detection and rapid response platform in vehicular networks. IEEE Access 6:44570–44579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Zhang T (2018) Distributed privacy-preserving collaborative intrusion detection systems for VANETs. IEEE Trans Signal Inform Process Over Netw 4(1):148–161

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Kempe fellowship via project no. SMK21-0061, Sweden. Additional support was provided by the Wallenberg AI, Autonomous Systems and Software Program (WASP) funded by Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Science and Engineering, GCEK (Govt.), Bhawanipatna, BPUT, Rourkela, India

    Rajendra Prasad Nayak

  2. Department of Computer Science Engineering and Applications, IGIT (Govt.), Sarang, BPUT, Rourkela, India

    Srinivas Sethi

  3. Department of Computer Science Engineering and Applications, PMEC (Govt.), Berhampur, BPUT, Rourkela, India

    Sourav Kumar Bhoi

  4. Department of Computer Science and Engineering, SRM University, 522502, Amaravati, AP, India

    Kshira Sagar Sahoo

  5. Department of Computing Science, Umeå University, SE-901 87, Umeå, Sweden

    Kshira Sagar Sahoo

  6. Graduate School, Faculty of Information Technology, Duy Tan University, Da Nang, Viet Nam

    Anand Nayyar

Authors
  1. Rajendra Prasad Nayak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Srinivas Sethi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sourav Kumar Bhoi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kshira Sagar Sahoo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Anand Nayyar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors contributed equally to this work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anand Nayyar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There is no conflict of interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nayak, R.P., Sethi, S., Bhoi, S.K. et al. ML-MDS: Machine Learning based Misbehavior Detection System for Cognitive Software-defined Multimedia VANETs (CSDMV) in smart cities. Multimed Tools Appl 82, 3931–3951 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-022-13440-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-022-13440-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation