Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Multiple forgery detection in video using inter-frame correlation distance with dual-threshold

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Video forgery can be defined as the modification of the video contents. The alteration of the video by deletion and modification in the sequence of frames is a trivial task, which has made the authentication and originality detection more important. Frame insertion and deletion are the most common type of video forgery. The proposed method can identify these types of forgery along with its forged location, which makes this unique method. It defines the relationship between the adjacent frames using the correlation coefficient, finds the inter-frame correlation distance between the frames, calculates the minimum distance score, statistical features, and computes upper-bound, lower-bound threshold and sigma coefficient for the identification of forgery location. The proposed method defines insertion and deletion type forgery by using threshold controlled parameters and it is validated on the VIFFD dataset. The proposed method has also identified forgery with 97% accuracy at the frame level and 83% accuracy at the video level. The result analysis shows the superiority of the proposed method over the existing methods. This method is very effective in identifying the forgery type with its frame location.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aghamaleki JA, Behrad A (2016) Inter-frame video forgery detection and localization using intrinsic effects of double compression and quantization errors of video coding. Signal Processing: Image Communication

  2. Amerini I, Ballan L, Caldelli R, del Bimbo A, del Tongo L, Serra G (2013) Copy-move forgery detection and localization by means of robust clustering with J-linkage. Signal Process Image Commun 28(6):659–669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Baghel N, Raikwar SC, Bhatnagar C (2020) Image Conditioned Keyframe-Based Video Summarization Using Object Detection." arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.05269

  4. Bakas J, Naskar R, Dixit R (2019) Detection and localization of inter-frame video forgeries based on inconsistency in correlation distribution between Haralick coded frames. Multimed Tools Appl 78(4):4905–4935

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Feng C, Xu Z, Jia S, Zhang W, Xu Y (2017) Motion adaptive frame deletion detection for digital video forensics. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for video Technology

  6. Huang T, Zhang X, Huang W, Lin L, Weifeng S (2018) A multi-channel approach through fusion of audio for detecting video inter-frame forgery. Comput Secur 77:412–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jiang X, Wan W, Sun T, Shi YQ, Fellow, IEEE, Wang S (2013) Detection of Double Compression in MPEG-4 Videos Based on Markov Statistics. IEEE Signal Process Lett 20(5):447–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kaur H, Jindal N (2020) Deep convolutional neural network for graphics forgery detection in video. Wirel Pers Commun 112:1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kharat J, Chougule S (2020) A passive, blind forgery detection technique to identify frame duplication attack. Multimed Tools Appl 79:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kumar V, Sharma KG, Jalal AS (2014) Support vector machine-based macro-block mode decision in MPEG-2 video compression. Int J Comput Vis Robot 4(4):349–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kumar V, Singh A, Kansal V, Gaur M (2020) A Comprehensive Analysis on Video Forgery Detection Techniques (March 29, 2020). Proceedings of the International Conference on Innovative Computing & Communications (ICICC)

  12. Kumar V, Singh A, Kansal V, Gaur M (2021) A comprehensive survey on passive video forgery detection techniques. In: Khanna A, Singh AK, Swaroop A (eds) Recent studies on computational intelligence. Studies in computational intelligence, vol 921. Springer, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lin G-S, Chang J-F, Chuang C-H (2011) Detecting frame duplication based on spatial and temporal analyses. International conference on Computer Science & Education (ICCSE)

  14. Luoa W, Wu M, Huang J (2008) MPEG recompression detection based on block artifacts. Proceedings volume 6819, security, forensics, steganography, and watermarking of multimedia contents X; 68190X. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.767112

  15. Nguyen XH, Hu J (2020) VIFFD - A dataset for detecting video inter-frame forgeries. Mendeley Data 5. https://doi.org/10.17632/r3ss3v53sj.5

  16. Pun CM, Yuan XC, Bi XL (2015) Image forgery detection using adaptive over segmentation and feature point matching. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur 10(8):1705–1716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Shanableh T (2013) Detection of frame deletion for digital video forensics. J Digit Invest 10(4):350–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sharma H, Kanwal N (2021) Video interframe forgery detection: Classification, technique & new dataset. J Comput Secur 29(5):531–550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Shelke NA, Kasana SS (2021) Multiple forgery detection and localization technique for digital video using PCT and NBAP. Multimed Tools Appl. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-021-10989-8

  20. Shelke NA, Kasana SS (2021) A comprehensive survey on passive techniques for digital video forgery detection. Multimed Tools Appl 80(4):6247–6310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Singh RD, Agarwal N (2017) Video content authentication techniques: a comprehensive survey. Multimed Syst 24:211–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00530-017-0538-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Singh RD, Aggarwal N (2015) Detection of re-compression, transcoding andframedeletion for digital video authentication. International Conference on Recent Advances in Engineering & Computational Sciences (RAECS)

  23. Singh G, Singh K (2019) Video frame and region duplication forgery detection based on correlation coefficient and coefficient of variation. Multimed Tools Appl 78(9):11527–11562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sitara K, Mehtre BM (2017) A comprehensive approach for exposing inter-frame video forgeries IEEE 13th international colloquium on signal processing & its applications (CSPA)

  25. Su L, Li C (2017) A novel passive forgery detection algorithm for video region duplication. Multidimens Syst Signal Process, Springer Nature 29:1173–1190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11045-017-0496-6

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Su Y, Xu J (2010) Detection of double-compression in MPEG-2 videos. International Workshop on Intelligent Systems and Applications

  27. Sun T, Wang W, Jiang X (2012) Exposing video forgeries by detecting MPEG double compression. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP)

  28. Vazquez-Padin D, Fontani M, Bianchi T, Comesaña P, Piva A, Barni M (2012) Detection of video double encoding with GOP size estimation. IEEE International Workshop on Information Forensics and Security (WIFS), December, 2–5, Tenerife, Spain, IEEE

  29. Wang W, Farid H (2007) Exposing digital forgeries in video by detecting duplication. MM&Sec’07, September 20–21, Dallas, Texas, USA

  30. Wang W, Farid H (2007) Exposing digital forgeries in video by detecting duplication. In: Proceedings of 9th workshop on Multimedia & Security. pp. 35–42

  31. Wang W, Farid H (2009) Exposing digital forgeries in video by detecting double quantization. Proceedings of the 11th ACM workshop on multimedia and security

  32. Wang Q, Li Z, Zhang Z, Ma Q (2014) Video inter-frame forgery identification based on consistency of correlation coefficients of gray values. J Comput Commun 02:51–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Wu Y, Jiang X, Sun T, Wang W (2014) Exposing video inter-frame forgery based on velocity field consistency. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP)

  34. Yang J, Huang T, Su L (2016) Using similarity analysis to detect frame duplication forgery in videos. Multimed Tools Appl 75:1793. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-014-2374-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Advanced Studies, Dr. A P J Abdul Kalam Technical University, Lucknow, India

    Vinay Kumar & Manish Gaur

  2. Department of Computer Engineering and Applications, G.L.A University, Mathura, India

    Vinay Kumar

Authors
  1. Vinay Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Manish Gaur
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vinay Kumar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumar, V., Gaur, M. Multiple forgery detection in video using inter-frame correlation distance with dual-threshold. Multimed Tools Appl 81, 43979–43998 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-022-13284-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-022-13284-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation