Skip to main content
Log in

A new deep learning architecture for dehazing of aerial remote sensing images

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A major problem in most aerial remote image processing applications is the presence of haze in images. It is a phenomenon by which particles in the atmosphere disperse light, thus altering the quality of the overall image. This can be detrimental to the performance of vision-based algorithms such as those concerned with object detection. There have been numerous attempts using traditional image processing techniques as well as using deep learning approaches to eliminate this haze. In most cases, models tend to make assumptions on the nature of haze that are rarely true in reality. In this paper, we propose an end-to-end deep learning architecture that can dehaze aerial remote sensing images efficiently with minimal deviation from the ground truth. Many of the assumptions made in other models are eliminated and the relationship between hazed and dehazed images is directly computed. The proposed model is based on the observation that identifying structural and statistical portions separately from an image and using those features to reconstruct the image can give a realistic dehazed image. It also makes use of information exposed by different color spaces to achieve this using lesser computation. The experimental quantitative and qualitative results of the proposed architecture are compared with recent benchmark dehaze models on NYU hazy dataset and real-world hazy images. Experimental results yield that the proposed architecture outperforms benchmark models on test aerial remote sensing images.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ancuti C, Ancuti CO, De Vleeschouwer C (2016) D-HAZYx: a dataset to evaluate quantitatively dehazing algorithms. In: 2016 IEEE International conference on image processing (ICIP), 2226–2230

  2. Ancuti CO, Ancuti C, Sbert M, Timofte R (2019) Dense haze: a benchmark for image dehazing with dense-haze and haze-free images. In: IEEE International conference on image processing (ICIP), IEEE ICIP 2019

  3. Ancuti CO, Ancuti C, Timofte R, De Vleeschouwer C (2018) O-HAZE: a dehazing benchmark with real hazy and Haze-Free outdoor images. In: 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on computer vision and pattern recognition workshops (CVPRW), 867–8678

  4. Choi JYLK, Bovik AC (2015) Referenceless prediction of perceptual fog density and perceptual image defogging. IEEE Trans Image Process 23(11):3888–3901. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2015.2456502

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Dudhane A, Murala S (2019) CDNEt: single image de-hazing using unpaired adversarial training. In: 2019 IEEE Winter conference on applications of computer vision (WACV), 1147–1155

  6. Dudhane A, Murala S (2020) RYF-Net: deep fusion network for single image haze removal. IEEE Trans Image Process 29:628–640

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Golts A, Freedman D, Elad M (2020) Unsupervised single image dehazing using dark channel prior loss. IEEE Trans Image Process 29:2692–2701

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. He K, Sun J, Tang X (2011) Single image haze removal using dark channel prior. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 33(12):2341–2353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. He K, Sun J, Tang X (2013) Guided image filtering. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 35(6):1397–1409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. He K, Zhang X, Ren S, Sun J (2016) Deep residual learning for image recognition. In: 2016 IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (CVPR), 770–778

  11. Jiao L, Huo L, Hu C, Tang P Refined UNet: UNet-based refinement network for cloud and shadow precise segmentation. Remote Sens 12(12):2072–4292. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12122001. https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/12/12/2001

  12. Ju M, Ding C, Guo YJ, Zhang D (2020) IDGCP: image dehazing based on gamma correction prior. IEEE Trans Image Process 29:3104–3118

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Katsigiannis S, Scovell J, Ramzan N, Janowski L, Corriveau P, Saad M, Wallendael G Interpreting MOS scores, when can users see a diference? Understanding user experience diferences for photo quality, Quality and User Experience 3 https://doi.org/10.1007/s41233-018-0019-8

  14. Lan M, Zhang Y, Zhang L, Du B (2020) Global context based automatic road segmentation via dilated convolutional neural network. Inform Sci 535:156–171. ISSN 0020-0255 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2020.05.062https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2020.05.062. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020025520304862

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Li R, Pan J, Li Z, Tang J (2018) Single image dehazing via conditional generative adversarial network. In: 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 8202–8211

  16. Li B, Peng X, Wang Z, Xu J, Feng D (2017) AOD-Net: all-in-one dehazing network. In: 2017 IEEE International conference on computer vision (ICCV), 4780–4788

  17. Li B, Ren W, Fu D, Tao D, Feng D, Zeng W, Wang Z (2019) Benchmarking single-image dehazing and beyond. IEEE Trans Image Process 28(1):492–505

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Lin M, Chen Q, Yan S (2014) Network in network. In: Bengio Y, LeCun Y (eds) 2nd International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2014, Banff, AB, Canada, April 14-16, 2014, Conference Track Proceedings

  19. Lunetta RS, Knight JF, Ediriwickrema J, Lyon JG, Worthy LD (2006) Land-cover change detection using multi-temporal MODIS NDVI data. Remote Sens Environ 105 (2):142–154. ISSN 0034-4257 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2006.06.018. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034425706002549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mittal A, Soundararajan R, Bovik AC (2013) Making a “Completely blind” image quality analyzer. IEEE Signal Process Lett 20(3):209–212. https://doi.org/10.1109/LSP.2012.2227726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Narasimhan SKNSG (2002) Vision and the Atmosphere. Int J Comput Vis 48:233–254. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016328200723

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Nathan Silberman PK, Hoiem D, Fergus R (2012) Indoor segmentation and support inference from RGBD images. In: ECCV

  23. Nuzillard D, Curila S, Curila M Blind separation in low frequencies using wavelet analysis, application to artificial vision 821631

  24. Pal N, Lal DS, Kshitij S Visibility enhancement of images degraded by hazy weather conditions using modified non-local approach. Optik 163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2018.02.067

  25. Pal N, Lal DS, Kshitij S (2017) Modified visibility Restoration-Based contrast enhancement algorithm for colour foggy images. IETE Tech Rev:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/02564602.2016.1276868

  26. Pal NS, Lal S, Shinghal K (2019) A robust framework for visibility enhancement of foggy images. Eng Sci Technol Int J 22:22–32

    Google Scholar 

  27. Park J, Han DK, Ko H (2020) Fusion of heterogeneous adversarial networks for single image dehazing. IEEE Trans Image Process 29:4721–4732

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Ronneberger O, Fischer P, Brox T (2015) U-Net: convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In: Navab N., Hornegger J, Wells WM, Frangi AF (eds) Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention – MICCAI 2015. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 234–241

  29. Tan RT (2008) Visibility in bad weather from a single image. In: 2008 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2008.4587643

  30. Wang Z, Bovik AC, Sheikh HR, Simoncelli EP (2004) Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Trans Image Process 13(4):600–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Wu Q, Ren W, Cao X (2020) Learning interleaved cascade of shrinkage fields for joint image dehazing and denoising. IEEE Trans Image Process 29:1788–1801

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Xiao D, Yin L, Fu Y (2021) Open-pit mine road extraction from high-resolution remote sensing images using RATT-UNet. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2021.3065148

  33. Yeh C, Huang C, Kang L (2020) Multi-scale Deep residual learning-based single image haze removal via image decomposition. IEEE Trans Image Process 29:3153–3167

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This publication is the outcome of R & D work undertaken in the Young Faculty Research Fellowship project under Visvesvaraya Ph.D. Scheme of Ministry of Electronics & Information Technology (MeitY), Government of India in the National Institute of Technology Karnataka, Surathkal being implemented by Digital India Corporation (Formerly Media Lab Asia), New Delhi, Grant No. DIC/MUM/GA/10(37)D, Dated 24-01-2019.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shyam Lal.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kalra, A., Sequeira, A., Manjunath, A. et al. A new deep learning architecture for dehazing of aerial remote sensing images. Multimed Tools Appl 81, 43639–43655 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-022-13122-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-022-13122-5

Keywords

Navigation