Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Ink analysis based forensic investigation of handwritten legal documents

  • 1169: Interdisciplinary Forensics: Government, Academia and Industry Interaction
  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Document falsification is among the fastest growing problems all over the world. Disclosure of such document is not always possible due to the conspiracy of attorney bodies; especially legal documents such as bank cheques, contracts, cash memos, and so on. Handwritten document tampering detection due to addition of new word(s) in judicial documents is the prime objective of this research. Minute alteration in writing causes financial loss to a person or to an organization and decreases the global economy. Such intangible assets remain undiscovered owing to lack of proper forensic techniques. Though writing style imitation can be possible, however, the possibility of getting exactly the same pen of the authorized document is quite impossible for an imitator. Hence, the paper introduces a solution to detect forgery in handwritten legal documents by analyzing perceptually similar pen ink. Forgery activity happens either ends of a written document by appending new word(s)/letter(s) with similar type of pen. The work is formulated as a binary classification problem and established with the help of several statistical features and three different classifiers: Multilayer Perceptron(MLP), RBF-SVM, and Random Forest(RF). Besides, the problem has also been implemented through some DCNN approaches to check whether it is possible to reflect the forgery by direct approaches. The efficiency of the proposed method is quite promising for involvement in the examination of forensic documents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barbosa RS, Lins RD, Lira EF, Camara ACA (2014) Later added strokes or text - fraud detection in documents written with ball point pens. In: Proceedings of the international conference on document analysis and recognition, pp 517–522

  2. Bertrand R, Gomez-Kramer P, Terrades OR, Franco P, Ogier J (2013) A system based on intrinsic features for fraudulent document detection. In: Proceedings of the international conference on document analysis and recognition, pp 106–110

  3. Beware! cheque frauds on rise, police in a fix. here’s all you need to know. Timesnownews, Accessed 11 Jan 2019

  4. Brauns EB, Dyer RB (2006) Fourier transform hyperspectral visible imaging and the nondestructive analysis of potentially fraudulent documents. J Appl Spectrosc 60(8):833–840

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Brown C, Kirk P (1954) Paper electrophoresis in the identification of inks. J Crim Law Criminol Police Sci 45:473–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen H, Meng H, Cheng K (2002) A survey of methods used for the identification and characterization of inks. J Forensic Sci 1(1):1–14

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chen Y, Gao S (2020) Forgery numeral handwriting detection based on convolutional neural network. In: Proceedings of the international conference on information technology and mechatronics engineering conference (ITOEC), pp 201–205

  8. Colwell L KB (1964) Ballpoint pen examination by high pressure liquid chromatography. J Assoc Off Anal Chem 60:613–618

    Google Scholar 

  9. Crown D, Conway J, Kirk P (1961) Differentiation of blue ballpoint inks using chemical spot tests. Journal of Criminal Law 5(3):338–343

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dansena P, Bag S, Pal R (2017) Differentiating pen inks in handwritten bank cheques using multi-layer perceptron. In: Proceedings of the international conference on pattern recognition and machine intelligence, vol 10597, pp 655–663

  11. Dansena P, Bag S, Pal R (2020) Quantitative assessment of capabilities of colour models for pen ink discrimination in handwritten documents. IET Image Process 14:1594–1604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dansena P, Bag S, Pal R (2021) Generation of synthetic data for handwritten word alteration detection. IEEE Access 9:38979–38990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dasari H, Bhagvati C (2007) Identification of non-black inks using hsv color spaces. In: Proceedings of the international conference on document analysis and recognition, pp 486–490

  14. Deng X, Liub Q, Deng Y, Mahadevand S (2016) An improved method to construct basic probability assignment based on the confusion matrix for classification problem. Int J Inform Sci 340–341:250–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Duch W, Wieczorek T, Biesiada J, Blachnik M (2004) Comparison of feature ranking methods based on information entropy.. In: Proceedings of the international conference on joint conference on neural networks, pp 1415–1419

  16. Edelman G, Gaston E, vanLeeuwen T, Cullen P, M. A (2012) Hyperspectral imaging for non-contact analysis of forensic traces. J Forensic Sci 223:28–39

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gorai A, Pal R, Gupta P (2016) Document fraud detection by ink analysis using texture features and histogram matching. In: Proceedings of the international joint conference on neural networks, pp 4512–4517

  18. Han J, Kamber M, Pei J (2012) Data mining concepts and techniques, 3rd edn. Morgan Kaufmann, Waltham

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Hardcastle R, Hall M (1978) A technique for the enhancement of the infrared luminescence of inks. J Forensic Sci Soc 18:53–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Horton RA, Nelson LK (1991) An evaluation of the use of laser-induced infrared luminescence to differentiate writing inks. J Forensic Sci 36:838–843

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Idrbt cheque image dataset. http://www.idrbt.ac.in/icid.html

  22. Kao H, Wen C (2020) An offline signature verification and forgery detection method based on a single known sample and an explainable deep learning approach. J Appl Sci 10(11):3716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Khan JM, Yousaf J, Khurshid K, Abbas A, Shafait F (2018) Automated forgery detection in multispectral document images using fuzzy clustering. In: Proceedings of the international workshop on document analysis systems, pp 393–398

  24. Khan Z, Shafait F, Mian A (2015) Automatic ink mismatch detection for forensic document analysis. Pattern Recogn 48(11):3615–3626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I, Hinton GE (2012) Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In: Proceedings of the internation conference on advances in neural information processing systems, pp 1097–1105

  26. Kumar A, Tiwari A (2019) A comparative study of otsu thresholding and k-means algorithm of image segmentation. Int J Eng Technical Res (IJETR) 9 (5):12–14

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kumar R, Pal NR, Chanda B, Sharma JD (2012) Forensic detection of fraudulent alteration in ball-point pen strokes. IEEE Trans Inform Forensics Secur 7(2):809–820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kumar R, Pal N R, Sharma JD, Chanda B (2009) A novel approach for detection of alteration in ball pen writings. In: Proceedings of the international conference on pattern recognition and machine intelligence, pp 400–405

  29. Laylo AMC, Decillo MDA, Boo LAF, Sarmiento JS (2019) Signify: signature verification technique using convolutional neural network. Int J Recent Technol Eng (IJRTE) 8(2):1763–1767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Megahed A, Fadl SM, Han Q, Li Q (2017) Handwriting forgery detection based on ink colour features. In: IEEE international conference on software engineering and service science (ICSESS), pp 141–144

  31. Mukundan R (2001) Image analysis by tchebichef moments. IEEE Trans Image Process 10(9):1357–1364

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Otsu N (1979) A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 9(1):62–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Packard RJ (1964) Selective wavelength examination applied to ink differentiation problem. J Forensic Sci 9(1):100–105

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  34. Pak M, Kim S (2017) A review of deep learning in image recognition. In: Proceedings of the international conference on computer applications and information processing technology (CAIPT), pp 1–3

  35. Roy P, Bag S (2018) Identification of fraudulent alteration by similar pen ink in handwritten bank cheque. In: Proceedings of the international conference on computer vision & image processing, vol 1024, pp 183–195

  36. Roy P, Bag S (2019) Detection of handwritten document forgery by analyzing writers handwritings. In: Proceedings of the international conference on pattern recognition and machine intelligence, vol 11941, pp 596–605

  37. Roy P, Bag S (2019) Forensic performance on handwriting to identify forgery owing to word alteration. In: Proceedings of the international conference on identity, security, and behavior analysis, pp 1–9

  38. Ryu SJ, Lee HY, CIL H (2008) Document forgery detection with svm classifier and image quality measures. In: Proceedings of the international conference on advances in multimedia information processinglee hk, vol 5353, pp 486–495

  39. Sensi C, Cantu A (1982) Infrared luminescence: is it a valid method to differentiate among inks? J Forensic Sci 27:196–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Taylor LR (1984) Intersecting lines as a means of fraud detection. J Forensic Sci 37(2):528–541

    Google Scholar 

  41. Teague MR (1980) Image analysis via the general theory of moments. J Opt Soc Amer 70:920–930

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  42. Teh C H, Chin RT (1974) On image analysis by the methods of moments. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Machine Intell 10:496–513

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  43. Wadhwa A, Maheshwari M, Dansena P, Bag S (2018) Geometrical and structural features for forensics in handwritten bank cheques. In: IEEE India council international conference (INDICON), pp 1–6

  44. Wang, Zhang L, Wei D, Zhao Y, Wang J (2017) The principle and application of hyperspectral imaging technology in detection of handwriting. In: Proceedings of the international conference on advanced infocomm technology

  45. Z K, Shafait F, Mian A (2013) Hyperspectral imaging for ink mismatch detection. In: Proceedings of the international conference on document analysis and recognition, pp 877–881

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are very thankful for the financial support provided by the sponsor of the project named ”Design and Implementation of Multiple Strategies to Identify Handwritten Forgery Activities in Legal Documents” (No. ECR/2016/001251, Dt.16.03.2017), SERB, Govt. of India.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Indian Institute of Technology(Indian School of Mines), Dhanbad, Jharkhand, 826004, India

    Priyanka Roy & Soumen Bag

Authors
  1. Priyanka Roy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Soumen Bag
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Priyanka Roy.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Roy, P., Bag, S. Ink analysis based forensic investigation of handwritten legal documents. Multimed Tools Appl 81, 23007–23047 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-022-12175-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-022-12175-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation