Skip to main content
Log in

A novel audio watermarking scheme based on fuzzy inference system in DCT domain

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Digital watermarking technology provides an effective potential solution to copyright protection and authentication of digital media. In this article, a new design of audio watermarking is introduced which is able to make compromise between transparency, robustness, and capacity by means of the synergy between fuzzy inference system, Singular Value Decomposition (SVD), and Fibonacci’s sequence in Discrete Cosine Transform (DCT). In the embedding phase, the proposed method, first of all, finds proper segments for inserting watermark data by helping fuzzy inference system with energy, zero-crossing rate (ZCR), and music edge features. Then, the watermark bits are embedded in the suitable segments based on collaboration of SVD technique and Fibonacci sequence in DCT domain. The proposed watermark extraction is performed in blind manner. The results on five Blues, Electronic, Classic, Jazz and Rock audio files show that the proposed method has high transparency (in average SNR = 49.80 dB) with payload of 598.34 bps. Moreover, robustness tests against Stirmark attacks show that the average of error rate is 1.3644, which means the proposed scheme has high stability in the digital signal processing attacks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Al-Haj A (2014) An imperceptible and robust audio watermarking algorithm. EURASIP J Audio Spee 2014(1):37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ali M, Ahn CW (2018) An optimal image watermarking approach through cuckoo search algorithm in wavelet domain. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 9(3):602–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Arnold M et al (2013) A phase-based audio watermarking system robust to acoustic path propagation. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur 9(3):411–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bhardwaj A et al (2018) Robust video watermarking using significant frame selection based on coefficient difference of lifting wavelet transform. Multimed Tools Appl 77(15):19659–19678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bhat V, Sengupta I, Das A (2011) An audio watermarking scheme using singular value decomposition and dither-modulation quantization. Multimed Tools Appl 52(2–3):369–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Boney L, Tewfik A, Hamdy K (1996) Digital watermarks for audio signals, in: The Third IEEE International Conference on Multimedia Computing and Systems, pp. 473–480.

  7. Chen ST, Hsu CY, Huang HN (2015) Wavelet-domain audio watermarking using optimal modification on low-frequency amplitude. IET Signal Process 9(2):166–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cox I et al (2007) Digital watermarking and steganography (pp. 142–143). Morgan Kaufmann, Los Altos

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dhar PK, Shimamura T (2014) Audio watermarking in transform domain based on singular value decomposition and Cartesian-polar transformation. Int J Speech Tech 17(2):133–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dhar PK, Shimamura T (2015) Blind SVD-based audio watermarking using entropy and log-polar transformation. J Information Secur Appl 20:74–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fan M, Wang H (2009) Chaos-based discrete fractional sine transform domain audio watermarking scheme. Comput Electr Eng 35(3):506–516

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Faragallah OS (2018) Secure audio cryptosystem using hashed image LSB watermarking and encryption. Wirel Pers Commun 98(2):2009–2023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hu H-T, Chang J-R (2017) Efficient and robust framesynchronized blind audio watermarking by featuring multilevel DWT and DCT. Clust Comput 20(1):805–816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hu H-T, Hsu L-Y (2015) Robust, transparent and highcapacity audio watermarking in DCT domain. Signal Process 109:226–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hu HT, Hsu LY (2017) Supplementary schemes to enhance the performance of DWT-RDM-based blind audio watermarking. Circ Syst Signal Pr 36(5):1890–1911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hu HT, Hsu LY, Chou HH (2014) Perceptual-based DWPT-DCT framework for selective blind audio watermarking. Signal Process 105:316–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hu HT, et al. (2014) Incorporation of perceptually energycompensated qim into dwt-dct based blind audio watermarking. In Proceedings of the tenth international conference on intelligent information hiding and multimedia signal processing (pp. 748–752). IEEE.

  18. Hu P et al (2016) Robust time-spread echo watermarking using characteristics of host signals. Electron Lett 52(1):5–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Huang HN, Chen ST, Lin MS, Kung WM, Hsu CY (2015) Optimization-based embedding for waveletdomain audio watermarking. J Signal Process Syst 80(2):197–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Jeyhoon M et al (2017) Blind audio watermarking algorithm based on DCT, linear regression and standard deviation. Multimed Tools Appl 76(3):3343–3359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Jeyhoon M, Asgari M, Ehsan L, Jalilzadeh SZ (2017) Blind audio watermarking algorithm based on DCT, linear regression and standard deviation. Multimed Tools Appl 76(3):3343–3359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jindal H, Saxena S, Singh S (2014) Challenges and issues in underwater acoustics sensor networks: a review. in Proceedings of International Conference on Parallel, Distributed and Grid Computing (PDGC-2014), pp. 251–255

  23. Jindal H, Kasana SS, Saxena S (2016) A novel image zooming technique using wavelet coefficients, in Book: Proceedings of International Conference on Recent Cognizance in Wireless Communication and Image Processing, pp. 1-7, 2016, Springer, New Delhi, India

  24. Jindal H, Saxena S, Kasana SS (2017) Triangular pyramidal topology to measure temporal and spatial variations in Shallow River water using ad-hoc sensors network. Ad Hoc and Sensor Wireless Networks, Old City Publishing 39(1–4):1–35

    Google Scholar 

  25. Jindal H, Saxena S, Kasana SS (2018) A sustainable multiparametric sensors network topology for river water quality monitoring. Wirel Netw 24(1):3241–3265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Jindal H, Kasana SS, Saxena S (2018) Underwater pipelines panoramic image transmission and refinement using acoustic sensors. Int J Wavelets, Multiresolut Inform Process World Sci 16(1):1850013

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Kansal V, Kaur A (2013) Comparison of Mamdani-type and Sugeno-type FIS for water flow rate control in a rawmill. Int J Sci Eng Res 4(6):2580–2584

    Google Scholar 

  28. Karajeh H, Maqableh M (2018) An imperceptible, robust, and high payload capacity audio watermarkingscheme based on the DCT transformation and Schur decomposition. Analog Integr Circ Sig Process 99(3):571–583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Karajeh H et al (2018) A robust digital audio watermarking scheme based on DWT and Schur decomposition. Multimed Tools Appl

  30. Kaur A, Dutta MK (2018) An optimized high payload audio watermarking algorithm based on LU-factorization. Multimedia Systems 24(3):341–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kaur S, Jindal H (2017) Enhanced image watermarking technique using wavelets and interpolation. Int J Image, Graphics Signal Process (IJIGSP) 9(7):23–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kim C et al (2018) Separable reversible data hiding in encrypted halftone image. Displays 55:71–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Kim C et al (2018) Lossless data hiding for absolute moment block truncation coding using histogram modification. J Real-Time Image Proc 14(1):101–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kim C, Yang C-N, Leng L (2020) High-capacity data hiding for ABTC-EQ based compressed image. Electronics 9(4):644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Kim C et al (2020) Hybrid data hiding based on AMBTC using enhanced hamming code. Appl Sci 10(15):5336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Koshy T (2017) Fibonacci and Lucas numbers with applications. Wiley, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Kumsawat P (2010) An efficient digital audio watermarking scheme based on genetic algorithm. In Book an efficient digital audio watermarking scheme based on genetic algorithm. Series an efficient digital audio watermarking scheme based on genetic algorithm (pp. 481–485). IEEE.

  38. Lei B, Soon Y, Tan EL (2013) Robust SVD-based audio watermarking scheme with differential evolution optimization. IEEE Trans Audio Speech Lang Process 21(11):2368–2378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Lei B, Zhou F, Tan EL, Ni D, Lei H, Chen S, Wang T (2015) Optimal and secure audio watermarking scheme based on self-adaptive particle swarm optimization and quaternion wavelet transform. Signal Process 113:80–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Leng L et al (2017) Dual-source discrimination power analysis for multi-instance contactless palmprint recognition. Multimed Tools Appl 76(1):333–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Leng L et al Dynamic weighted discrimination power analysis in DCT domain for face and palmprint recognition. In 2010 international conference on information and communication technology convergence (ICTC). 2010. IEEE.

  42. Lerch, A. (2002). Zplane development, EAQUAL evaluate audio QUALity, version: 0.1. 3alpha. Retrieved July 2018, from http://www.mp3-tech.org/programmer/misc.html.

  43. Li R, Xu S, Yang H (2016) Spread spectrum audio watermarking based on perceptual characteristic aware extraction. IET Signal Process 10(3):266–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Mehta R et al (2018) Robust image watermarking scheme in lifting wavelet domain using GA-LSVR hybridization. Int J Mach Learn Cybern 9(1):145–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Mohsenfar SM, Mosleh M, Barati A (2015) Audio watermarking method using QR decomposition and genetic algorithm. Multimed Tools Appl 74(3):759–779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Mosleh M, Hosseinpour N (2013) Blind robust audio watermarking based on remaining numbers in discrete cosine transform. International Journal on Technical and Physical Problems of Engineering 5:18–26

    Google Scholar 

  47. Mosleh M, Latifpour H, Kheyrandish M, Mosleh M, Hosseinpour N (2016) A robust intelligent audio watermarking scheme using support vector machine. Front Inform Tech El 17(12):1320–1330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Mosleh M et al (2016) A robust intelligent audio watermarking scheme using support vector machine. Front Inform Technol Electronic Eng 17(12):1320–1330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Mourya G, Jindal H, Saxena S (2015) Software perspective to underwater acoustic sensors network. in Proceedings of International Conference on Next Generation Computing Technologies (NGCT-2015), pp. 187–191, 2015.

  50. Nguyen T-S et al (2016) A reversible image authentication scheme based on fragile watermarking in discrete wavelet transform domain. AEU-International Journal of Electronics and Communications 70(8):1055–1061

    Google Scholar 

  51. Pourhashemi, S.M., M. Mosleh, and Y. Erfani, A novel audio watermarking scheme using ensemble-based watermark detector and discrete wavelet transform. Neural Comput & Applic, 2020: p. 1–21.

  52. Spanias A, Painter T, Atti V (2007) Audio signal processing and coding. John Wiley & Sons

  53. Swanson M, Kobayashi M, Tewfik A (1998) Multimedia data-embedding and watermarking technologies. Proc IEEE 86(6):1064–1087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Xia Z et al (2016) A privacy-preserving and copy-deterrence content-based image retrieval scheme in cloud computing. IEEE Trans Inform Foren Secur 11(11):2594–2608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Xiang Y et al (2014) Patchwork-based audio watermarking method robust to de-synchronization attacks. IEEE/ACM Trans Audio, Speech, Language Process 22(9):1413–1423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Xiang Y, Natgunanathan I, Rong Y, Guo S (2015) Spread spectrum-based high embedding capacity watermarking method for audio signals. IEEE/ACM Trans Audio, Speech, Language Process 23(12):2228–2237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Yuan XC, Pun CM, Chen CP (2015) Robust Mel-frequency cepstral coefficients feature detection and dualtree complex wavelet transform for digital audio watermarking. Inf Sci 298:159–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Zadeh LA (1996) Fuzzy logic= computing with words. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 4(2):103–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saeed Setayeshi.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mosleh, M., Setayeshi, S., Barekatain, B. et al. A novel audio watermarking scheme based on fuzzy inference system in DCT domain. Multimed Tools Appl 80, 20423–20447 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-021-10686-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-021-10686-6

Keywords

Navigation