Skip to main content
Log in

A fast source camera identification and verification method based on PRNU analysis for use in video forensic investigations

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Due to the rapid development of digital and cloud technologies, everyone can easily shoot and spread digital videos via email or social media. However, it is difficult for law enforcement to trace the origin of those digital videos, while some videos or images containing illegal information such as personal privacy, obscene pornography, and national security-related content. Recently, a significant breakthrough is achieved by using Photo-Response Non-Uniformity (PRNU) noise to characterize the camera sensor. However, PRNU analysis is often carried out on a frame-by-frame basis. As a result, the processing time is unbearable when treating a large set of videos and devices. In this paper, we propose a novel video forensic method considering both cameras rolling and I-frame of videos to improve the processing time and accuracy. Experimental results demonstrate that our proposed method is at a minimum of 15 times on average faster than the most wildly used method, PRNU analysis, and reduce the false positive rate as compared to existing methods used in the field of the forensic examination.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Notes

  1. Rolling is defined as the rotation around the optical axis of the camera.

References

  1. Bestagini P, Lubin L (2019) Special session 15: new challenges in video PRNU. In: IEEE Int. Conf. Image process. (ICIP) http://2019.ieeeicip.org/upload/files/201812121036101863.pdf. Accessed 10 Sept 2019

  2. Chen M, Fridrich J, Goljan M, Lukás J (2007) Source digital camcorder identification using sensor photo-response non-uniformity. In: SPIE electron. Imag, Photonics West, pp 1G–1H. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.696519

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen M, Fridrich J, Goljan M, Lukás J (2008) Determining image origin and integrity using sensor noise. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Security 3(1):74–90. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIFS.2007.916285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chuang W, Su H, Wu M (2011) Exploring compression effects for improved source camera identification using strongly compressed video. In: IEEE Int. Conf. Image process. (ICIP), pp.1953-1956. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIP.2011.6115855

  5. Cortiana A, Conotter V, Boato G, De Natale FGB (2011) Performance comparison of denoising filters for source camera identification. In: SPIE Media Watermarking, Security, and Forensics III 7880:788007. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.872489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dabov K, Foi A, Katkovnik V, Egiazarian K (2007) Image denoising by sparse 3-D transform-domain collaborative filtering. IEEE Trans Image Process 16(8):2080–2095. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2007.901238

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Du M (2017) Analysis of errors in forensic science. J Forensic Sci Med 3(3):139–143. https://doi.org/10.4103/jfsm.jfsm_8_17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Goljan M, Chen M, Comesaña P, Fridrich J (2016) Effect of compression on sensor-fingerprint based camera identification. In: IS&T Int. Symp. Electron. Imag., Media Watermarking, Security, and Forensics, San Francisco, CA, p 1–10. https://doi.org/10.2352/ISSN.2470-1173.2016.8.MWSF-086

  9. Goljan M, Fridrich J (2012) Sensor-fingerprint based identification of images corrected for lens distortion. SPIE Media Watermarking, Security, and Forensics 8303:83030H. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.909659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Goljan M, Fridrich J, Filler T (2009) Large scale test of sensor fingerprint camera identification. In: SPIE Media Forensics and Security 7254:72540I. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.805701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Iuliani M, Fontani M, Shullani D, Piva A (2019) Hybrid reference-based video source identification. Sensors 19(3):649. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19030649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kang X, Chen J, Lin K, Anjie P (2014) A context-adaptive spn predictor for trustworthy source camera identification. EURASIP J Image Video Process 2014(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-5281-2014-19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kang X, Li Y, Qu Z, Huang J (2012) Enhancing source camera identification performance with a camera reference phase sensor pattern noise. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Security 7(2):393–402. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIFS.2011.2168214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kurosawa K, Kuroki K, Saitoh N (1999) CCD fingerprint method-identification of a video camera from videotaped images. In: Int. Conf. Image Process. p 537–540. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIP.1999.817172

  15. Lawgaly A, Khelifi F (2016) Sensor pattern noise estimation based on improved locally adaptive DCT filtering and weighted averaging for source camera identification and verification. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Security 12(2):392–404. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIFS.2016.2620280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Li C (2010) Source camera identification using enhanced sensor pattern noise. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Security 5(2):280–287. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIFS.2010.2046268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Li C, Li Y (2012) Color-decoupled photo response non-uniformity for digital image forensics. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst Video Technol 22(2):260–271. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSVT.2011.2160750

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Lin X, Li C (2016) Preprocessing reference sensor pattern noise via spectrum equalization. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Security 11(1):126–140. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIFS.2015.2478748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lukas J, Fridrich J, Goljan M (2005) Digital ‘bullet scratches’ for images. In: IEEE Int. Conf. Image process. (ICIP), Genova, Italy, p III-65–III-68

  20. Lukas J, Fridrich J, Goljan M (2006) Digital camera identification from sensor pattern noise. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Security 1(2):205–214. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIFS.2006.873602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. McCloskey S (2008) Confidence weighting for sensor fingerprinting. In: IEEE Computer Society Conf. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, p 23–28. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPRW.2008.4562986

  22. Mıhçak MK, Kozintsev I, Ramchandran K (1999) Spatially adaptive statistical modeling of wavelet image coefficients and its application to denoising. In: IEEE Int. Conf. Acoust., Speech, Signal Process. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASSP.1999.757535

  23. Öktem R, Egiazarian K, Lukin VV, Ponomarenko NN, Tsymbal OV (2007) Locally adaptive DCT filtering for signal-dependent noise removal. EURASIP J Adv Signal Process 2007:042472. https://doi.org/10.1155/2007/42472

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Shullani D, Fontani M, Iuliani M, Shaya OA, Piva A (2017) VISION: a video and image dataset for source identification. EURASIP J Inf Security 2017:15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13635-017-0067-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Spy Blog - Watching Them, Watching Us (2019). Operation Algebra child rape convictions in Scotland: open WiFi tracking, digital camera image forensics. https://spyblog.org.uk/ssl/spyblog/2009/05/09/operation-algebra-child-rape-convictions-in-scotland-open-wifi-tracking-digi.html, Accessed 10 Sept 2019

  26. Taspinar S, Mohanty M, Memon N (2016) Source camera attribution using stabilized video. In: IEEE Int Workshop Inf Forensics Security (WIFS). https://doi.org/10.1109/WIFS.2016.7823918

  27. Yang W, Tsai L, Chen C (2017) Applying the sensor noise based camera identification technique to trace origin of digital images in forensic science. Forensic Sci J 16(1):19–42. https://doi.org/10.6593/FSJ.2017.1601.03

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work on this paper was supported by the National Science Council, Taiwan, Republic of China (MOST 107-2221-E-015-003-MY2, MOST 109-2221-E-015-002-).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wen-Chao Yang.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Some I-frames of the videos used for training and testing in the experiments are shown in this appendix. Figs. 5 and  6 show 2 I-frames of 8 testing videos and 8 testing videos, respectively. It is worth noting that there exist the similar scenes and colors in videos from different portable devices in both Figs. 5 and 6.

Fig. 5
figure 5figure 5

Some I-frames of the training videos in the experiments

Fig. 6
figure 6figure 6

Some I-frames of the testing videos in the experiments

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, WC., Jiang, J. & Chen, CH. A fast source camera identification and verification method based on PRNU analysis for use in video forensic investigations. Multimed Tools Appl 80, 6617–6638 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-020-09763-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-020-09763-z

Keywords

Navigation