Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Improvement of usability in user interfaces for massive data analysis: an empirical study

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Big Data challenges the conventional way of analyzing massive data and creates the need to improve the usability of existing user interfaces (UIs) in order to deal with massive amounts of data. How the UIs facilitate the search for information and helps in the end-user’s decision-making depends on developers and designers, who have no guides for producing usable UIs. We have proposed a set of interaction patterns for designing massive data analysis UIs by studying 27 real case studies of massive data analysis. We evaluate if the proposed patterns improve the usability of the massive data analysis UIs in the context of literature search. We conducted two replications of the same controlled experiment, one with 24 undergraduate students experienced in scientific literature search and the other with eight researchers who are experienced in biomedical literature search. The experiment, which was planned as a repeated measures design, compares UIs that have been enhanced with the proposed patterns versus original UIs in terms of three response variables: effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction. The outcomes show that the use of interaction patterns in UIs for massive data analysis yields better and more significant effects for the three response variables, enhancing the discovery and visualization of the data. The use of the proposed interaction design patterns improves the usability of the UIs that deal with massive data. The patterns can be considered as guides for helping designers and developers to design usable UIs for massive data analysis web applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. www.pros.webs.upv.es/

  2. www.scopus.com

  3. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/

  4. https://www.scopus.com/results/handle.uri

  5. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PubMed/

  6. http://www.gpower.hhu.de/

References

  1. Borchers JO (2000) “Interaction Design Patterns : Twelve Theses,” Position Pap. CHI Work. “‘Pattern Lang. INteractoin Des. Build. Momentum,’”

  2. Borchers J (2009) The aachen media space: design patterns for augmented work environments, in Designing User Friendly Augmented Work Environments, Springer, 2009, pp. 261–312.

  3. Borchers J, Buschmann F (2001) A pattern approach to interaction design. Wiley

  4. Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences 2nd edn. Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cremonesi P, Elahi M, and Garzotto F (2015) Interaction design patterns in recommender systems, in Proceedings of the Biannual Conference on Italian SIGCHI Chapter, 2015, pp. 66–73, https://doi.org/10.1145/2808435.2808442.

  6. Cremonesi P, Elahi M, Garzotto F (Feb. 2017) User interface patterns in recommendation-empowered content intensive multimedia applications. Multimed Tools Appl 76(4):5275–5309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-016-3946-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Datamer e-book (2016) Top five high-impact use cases for big data analytics. Available at. https://www.datameer.com/pdf/eBook-Top-Five-High-Impact-UseCases-for-Big-Data-Analytics.pdf. Accessed on Apr-22-2017.

  8. DigitalScience (2018) “Dimensions.” Available at. https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication. Accessed on Mar-03-2018.

  9. Douglas SM, Montelione GT, Gerstein M (2005) PubNet: a flexible system for visualizing literature derived networks. Genome Biol 6(9):R80. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2005-6-9-r80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Elliott AC, Woodward WA (2006) Statistical analysis quick reference guidebook: with SPSS examples. Sage Publications Pvt. Ltd.

  11. Ellis PD (2010) The essential guide to effect sizes: statistical power, meta-analysis, and the interpretation of research results. Cambridge University Press

  12. Field A (2013) Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics, 4th ed. Sage Publications Ltd.

  13. Fiorini N et al (2018, Jan.) PubMed labs: an experimental system for improving biomedical literature search. Database, vol 2018. https://doi.org/10.1093/database/bay094

  14. Folmer E (2006) Usability patterns in games. Futur. Play, vol. 6.

  15. Fritz MS, Arthur AM (2017) Moderator variables. Oxford University Press

  16. Genomenon (2018) “Mastermind - Comprehensive Genomic Search Engine.” Available at. https://mastermind.genomenon.com/. Accessed on Apr-22-2018.

  17. Good BM, Clarke EL, Loguercio S, Su AI (2012) Linking genes to diseases with a SNPedia-Gene Wiki mashup. J Biomed Semantics 3(1):S6. https://doi.org/10.1186/2041-1480-3-S1-S6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Graham I (2003) A pattern language for Web usability. Addison-Wesley.

  19. Granlund Å, Lafrenière D, and Carr DA (2001) A pattern-supported approach to the user Interface design process

    Google Scholar 

  20. Guerra E, Fernandes C (2010) An evaluation process for pattern languages, in Proceedings of the 8th Latin American Conference on Pattern Languages of Programs, 2010, pp. 18:1–18:11, https://doi.org/10.1145/2581507.2581525.

  21. IBM (2015) IBM big data use cases – What is a big data use case and how to get started – Exploration, 2015. Available at. http://www-01.ibm.com/software/data/bigdata/use-cases.html. Accessed on Apr-22-2017.

  22. Iñiguez-Jarrín CE, Panach JI, Pastor Ó (2018) Defining interaction design patterns to extract knowledge from big data. Advanced Information Systems Engineering 10816:539–553. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91563-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kuehl RO (2001) Diseño de experimentos: principios estadísticos de diseño y análisis de investigación, 2 ed. México

    Google Scholar 

  24. Laskowski N (2015) Ten big data case studies in a Nutshell, SearchCIO.com. pp. 11–12

  25. Lewis JR (1995) IBM computer usability satisfaction questionnaires: psychometric evaluation and instructions for use. Int J Hum Comput Interact 7(1):57–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lu Z (2011) PubMed and beyond: A survey of web tools for searching biomedical literature,” Database, vol. 2011, p. baq036, 2011, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/database/baq036.

  27. Marill JL, Miller N, Kitendaugh P (Jan. 2006) The MedlinePlus public user interface: studies of design challenges and opportunities. J Med Libr Assoc 94(1):30–40

    Google Scholar 

  28. Martín-Rodilla P, Panach JI (2014) Applications in the context of cultural heritage data

    Google Scholar 

  29. Nilsson EG (2009) Design patterns for user interface for mobile applications. Adv Eng Softw 40(12):1318–1328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Pentaho (2015) Big data uses cases | Pentaho. Available at. http://www.pentaho.com/big-data-use-cases. Accessed on Jun-11-2017.

  31. Pituch KA, Stevens JP (2015) Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences: analyses with SAS and IBM’s SPSS. Routledge

  32. Riley RD, Lambert PC, Abo-Zaid G (Feb. 2010) Meta-analysis of individual participant data: rationale, conduct, and reporting. BMJ 340:c221. https://doi.org/10.1136/BMJ.C221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Schmettow M (2006) User interaction design patterns for information retrieval, Eur. 2006, pp. 489–512, 2006.

  34. Scott B and Neil T (2009) Designing web interfaces: Principles and patterns for rich interactions. O’Reilly Media, Inc.

  35. Seffah A, Taleb M (2012) Tracing the evolution of HCI patterns as an interaction design tool. Innov Syst Softw Eng 8(2):93–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11334-011-0178-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Seidel N (2017) Empirical evaluation methods for pattern languages: sketches, classification, and network analysis, in Proceedings of the 22Nd European Conference on Pattern Languages of Programs, 2017, pp. 13:1--13:24, DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3147704.3147719.

  37. Seltman HJ (2012) Experimental design and analysis. Online at: http://www.stat.cmu.edu/~hseltman/309/Book/Book.pdf

  38. Templeton GF (2011) A two-step approach for transforming continuous variables to normal: implications and recommendations for IS research. Commun. Assoc. Inf., vol. 28

  39. The Hillside Group (1994) How to Hold a Writer’s Workshop, 1994. Available at. https://hillside.net/conferences/plop/235-how-to-hold-a-writers-workshop. Accessed on Dec-18-2018.

  40. Thimthong T, Chintakovid T, and Krootjohn S (2012) An empirical study of search box and autocomplete design patterns in online bookstore. SHUSER 2012–2012 IEEE Symp. Humanit. Sci. Eng. Res., pp. 1165–1170, https://doi.org/10.1109/SHUSER.2012.6268796.

  41. Tidwell J (1999) Common ground: a pattern language for human-computer interface design. O’Reilly Media

  42. Tidwell J (2010) Designing interfaces: patterns for effective interaction design. O’Reilly Media, Inc.

  43. Toxboe A (2018) User interface design pattern library. UI Patterns, 2013. Available at. http://ui-patterns.com. Accessed on Feb-05-2018.

  44. Van Duyne DK, Landay JA, Hong JI (2003) The design of sites : patterns, principles, and processes for crafting a customer-centered web experience. Addison-Wesley

  45. Van Solingen R, Basili V, Caldiera G, Rombach HD (2002) Goal question metric (gqm) approach. Encycl Softw Eng

  46. Van Welie M (2008) Patterns in interaction design. Available at. http://www.welie.com/patterns/. Accessed on Mar-01-2018.

  47. Vegas S, Apa C, Juristo N (2016) Crossover designs in software engineering experiments: benefits and perils. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 42(2):120–135. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2015.2467378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. VOSviewer (2015) Visualizing scientific landscapes, Centre for Science and Technology Studies, Leiden University, 2015. Available at. http://www.vosviewer.com/.

  49. Wohlin C, Runeson P, Höst M, Ohlsson MC, Regnell B, Wesslén A (2012) Experimentation in software engineering, vol 9783642290. Springer, United States

    Book  Google Scholar 

  50. Wu C, Jin X, Tsueng G, Afrasiabi C, Su AI (2016) BioGPS: building your own mash-up of gene annotations and expression profiles. Nucleic Acids Res 44(D1):D313–D316. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv1104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Yahoo (2006) Yahoo design pattern library. Available at. https://developer.yahoo.com/ypatterns/everything.html. Accessed on Apr-03-2017.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the members of the PROS Center Genome group for productive discussions. In addition, it is also important to highlight that the Secretaría Nacional de Educación, Ciencia y Tecnología (SENESCYT) and the Escuela Politécnica Nacional from Ecuador have supported this work. This project has also been developed with the financial support of the Spanish State Research Agency and the Generalitat Valenciana, under the projects TIN2016-80811-P and PROMETEO/2018/176, and co-financed with ERDF.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Research Center on Software Production Methods (PROS), Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino Vera s/n, 46022, Valencia, Spain

    Carlos Iñiguez-Jarrín & Oscar Pastor López

  2. Departamento de Informática y Ciencias de la Computación, Escuela Politécnica Nacional, Ladrón de Guevara, E11-253, Quito, Ecuador

    Carlos Iñiguez-Jarrín

  3. Escola Tècnica Superior d’Enginyeria, Departament d’Informàtica, Universitat de València, Avenida de la Universidad, s/n, 46100, Burjassot, Valencia, Spain

    José Ignacio Panach

Authors
  1. Carlos Iñiguez-Jarrín
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. José Ignacio Panach
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Oscar Pastor López
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carlos Iñiguez-Jarrín.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Iñiguez-Jarrín, C., Panach, J.I. & López, O.P. Improvement of usability in user interfaces for massive data analysis: an empirical study. Multimed Tools Appl 79, 12257–12288 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-019-08456-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-019-08456-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation