Multimedia Tools and Applications

, Volume 77, Issue 17, pp 22543–22566 | Cite as

Two stage image de-noising by SVD on large scale heterogeneous anisotropic diffused image data

  • Nafis uddin KhanEmail author
  • K. V. Arya


De-noising of images along with the edge enhancement has always been a challenging task in large scale heterogeneous image data. This paper presents a two stage image de-noising as well as edge enhancement method where in the first stage two copies of input noisy image are created through diffusion. The first copy is got by using anisotropic diffusion method which employ optimal diffusion function while the second copy is generated to improve the sharp edges by applying the combination of inverse heat diffusion and Canny edge detector. In the next stage, the singular value decomposition is applied on the two copies achieved in first stage to reduce the noise and improve the quality of detected edges. The optimal number of significant singular values have been estimated by the analysis of signal to noise ratio of singular value decomposed images of first copy. The singular values extracted from the second copy of the diffused image are superimposed with non decreasing weights from linear weighting function. Finally the sharp edged and noise reduced output image is generated by taking the linear combination of two singular value decomposed images. The performance of the proposed method has been compared with existing methods based on singular value decomposition as well as anisotropic diffusion. The experimental results exhibit that the proposed method efficiently enhances the edges by reducing the noisy significantly.


Singular value decomposition Anisotropic diffusion Image de-noising Edge enhancement 


  1. 1.
    Andrews HC, Patterson CL (1976) Singular value decompositions and digital image processing. IEEE Trans Acous Speech Signal Process ASSP-24:26–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brownrigg D (1984) The weighted median filter. Commun ACM 27:807–818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Catte F, Lions PL, Morel JM, Coll T (1992) Image selective smoothing and edge-detection by nonlinear diffusion. SIAM J Numer Anal 29:182–193MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chan FHY, Lam FK, Zhu H (1998) Adaptive thresholding by variational method. IEEE Trans Image Process 7:845–866Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chao LT (2007) A new adaptive center weighted median filter for suppressing impusive noise in images. Inform Sci 177:1073–1087CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chao SM, Tsai DM (2010) An improved anisotropic diffusion model for detail and edge preserving smoothing. Pattern Recogn Lett 31:2012–2023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chen T, Wu HR (2001) Adaptive impulse detection using center weighted median filters. IEEE Signal Process Lett 8(1):1–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dong Y, Xu S (2007) A new directional weighted median filter for removal of random valued impulsive noise. IEEE Signal Process Lett 14(3):193–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fang D, Nanning Z, Jianru X (2008) Image smoothing and sharpening based on nonlinear diffusion equation. Signal Process 88:2850–2855CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gilboa G, Sochen NA, Zeevi YY (2002) Regularized shock filters and complex diffusion. Lect Notes Comput Sci 2350:399–413CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gonzalez RC, Woods RE (2008) Digital image processing. Prentice Hall, Chapter 3, pp 144–168Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Goshtasby A, Satter M (2008) An adaptive window mechanism for image smoothing. Comput Vis Image Understand 111:15569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Guo Q, Zhang C, Zhang Y, Liu H (2016) An efficient SVD-based method for image denoising. IEEE Trans Circ Syst Vid Technol 26(5):868–880CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    He Y, Gan T, Chen W, Wang H (2011) Adaptive de-noising by singular value decomposition. IEEE Signal Process Lett 18(4):215–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hossain MF, Alsharif MR, Yamashita K (2008) Image de-noising using adaptive singular value decomposition in non-subsampled contourlet transform domain. ARPN J Eng Appl Sci 3(3):31–35Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hou Z (2003) Adaptive singular value decomposition in wavelet domain for image de-noising. Pattern Recogn 36:1747–1763CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jha SK, Yadava RDS (2011) De-noising by singular value decomposition and its application to electronic nose data processing. IEEE Sensors J 11(1):35–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Khan NU, Arya KV, Pattanaik M (2010) An efficient image noise removal and enhancement method. In: IEEE International Conference on systems, man and cybernetics. Istanbul, Turkey, October 10-13, pp 3735–3740Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Khan NU, Arya KV, Pattanaik M (2012) Fuzzy based diffusion coefficient function in anisotropic diffusion for impulse noise removal. In: Indian Conference on vision, graphics and image processing. Bombay, India, December 16-19Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Khan NU, Arya KV, Pattanaik M (2012) A robust PDE based image de-noising method. Int J Comput Electric Eng 4(3):303–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Khan NU, Arya KV, Pattanik M (2013) Histogram statistics based variance controlled adaptive threshold in anisotropic diffusion for low contrast image enhancement. Signal Process 93:1684–1693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Khan NU, Arya KV, Pattanaik M (2014) Efficient image de-noising and edge enhancement by singular value decomposition on anisotropic diifused image data. In: IEEE International conference on industrial and information systems. Gwalior, India, December 15–17Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Khan NU, Arya KV, Pattanik M (2014) Edge preservation of impulse noise filtered images by improved anisotropic diffusion. Multimed Tools Appl 73:573–597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Konstantinides K, Yao K (1988) Statistical analysis of effective singular values in matrix rank determination. IEEE Trans Acous Speech Signal Process 36:757–763CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Konstantinides K, Natarajan B, Yovanof GS (1997) Noise estimation and filtering using block-based singular value decomposition. IEEE Trans Image Process 6 (3):479–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mohideen K, Perumal A, Krishnan, Sathik M (2011) Image de-noising and enhancement using multi-wavelet with hard threshold in digital mammographic images. Int Arab J E-Technol 2(1):49–55Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Nikapour M, Nadernejad E, Ashtiani H, Hassanpour H (2009) Using PDEs for noise reduction in time series. Int J Comput ICT Res 3:42–48Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Perona P, Malik J (1990) Scale space and edge detection using anisotropic diffusion. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 12(8):629–639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Pinho AJ, Almeida AB (1996) Figure of merit for quality assessment of binary edge maps. In: Third IEEE International conference on image processing. Lausanne, Swittzerland, September 16–19, pp 591–594Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Puvanathasan P, Bizheva K (2009) Interval type-II fuzzy anisotropic diffusion algorithm for speckle noise reduction in optical coherence tomography images. Opt Express 17(2):733–746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Yu J, Wang Y, Shen Y (2008) Noise reduction and edge detection via kernel anisotropic diffusion. Pattern Recogn Lett 29:1496–1503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Zhijia Z, Haifeng Z, Haifeng S, Weigi Y (2008) SVD based image de-noising with the minimum energy model. In: IEEE International congress on image and signal processing. Sanya, China, May, 27–30, pp 411–415Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Electronics and Communication EngineeringJaypee University of Information TechnologyWaknaghatIndia
  2. 2.Department of Computer Science and EngineeringInstitute of Engineering and TechnologyLucknowIndia

Personalised recommendations