Skip to main content
Log in

On truthful auction mechanisms for electricity allocation with multiple time slots

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As technology evolves and electricity demand rises, an increasing number of researches have focused on the efficient electricity allocation mechanisms so as to make consumer demand adaptive to the supply of electricity at all times. Considering the respective characteristics of the fixed price and the dynamic price model commonly used in the electricity market, in this paper, we formulate the problem of electricity allocation as a novel combinatorial auction model, and then put forward two directly applicable mechanisms called TAMEA-FP based on fixed price model and TAMEA-DP based on dynamic price model respectively. In addition, it is theoretically proven that both the proposed mechanisms are equipped with the economic properties such as individual rationality, budget balance and truthfulness. Finally, extensive simulation results show that both the proposed mechanisms own the allocation efficiency and computational traceability with the time complexity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Generally, the unit of electricity is ‘KW’. In this paper, the unit of resource of electricity is called ’unit’ for more generalized model.

  2. Given r 1 =< r 11,…,r 1m > and r 2 =< r 21,…,r 2m > ,we donate r 1r 2if r 11r 21&…r 1m & ≤ r 2m .

References

  1. Akasiadis C, Chalkiadakis G (2013) Agent cooperatives for effective power consumption shifting. In: Proc. of 27th AAAI Conference on artificial intelligence (AAAI), pp 1263–1269

  2. Babaioff M, Nisan N (2011) Concurrent auctions across the supply chain. J Artif Intell Res 21(3):1–10

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Chichin S, Vo QB, Kowalczyk R (2014) Truthful market-based trading of cloud services with reservation price. In: Procs of 2014 IEEE international conference on services computing, pp 27–34

  4. Fumagalli E, Garrone P, Grilli L (2007) Service quality in the electricity industry: the role of privatization and managerial behavior. Energ Polic 35(12):6212–6224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gungor VC, Lu B, Hancke GP (2010) Opportunities and challenges of wireless sensor networks in smart grid. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 57(10):3557–3564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gungor VC, Sahin D, Kocak T et al (2011) Smart grid technologies: communication technologies and standards. IEEE Trans Indus Inf 7(4):529–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Huang, Scheller-Wolf, Alan et al (2002) Design of a MultiCUnit double auction ECMarket. Comput Intell 18(4):596–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ibars C, Navarro M, Giupponi L (2010) Distributed demand management in smart grid with a congestion game. In: Proc. of IEEE SmartGridComm, pp 495–500

  9. Klemperer P (1999) Auction theory: a guide to the literature. J Econ Surv 13(3):227–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Li C, Sycara K, Scheller A (2010) Combinatorial coalition formation for multi-item group-buying with heterogeneous customers. Decis Support Syst 49(1):1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Li Y, Lu H, Li J et al (2017) Underwater image de-scattering and classification by deep neural network. Comput Electr Eng 54:68–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lu H, Li B, Zhu J et al (2016) Wound intensity correction and segmentation with convolutional neural networks. In: Concurrency & computation practice & experience

  13. Lu H, Li Y (2017) Underwater image super-resolution by descattering and fusion. IEEE Access 5:670–679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lu H, Li Y, Nakashima S et al (2015) Single image dehazing through improved atmospheric light estimation. Multimed Tools Appl 1–16

  15. Lu H, Li Y, Xu X et al (2016) Underwater image enhancement method using weighted guided trigonometric filtering and artificial light correction. J Vis Commun Image Represent 38:504–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lu H, Li Y, Zhang L et al (2015) Contrast enhancement for images in turbid water. J Opt Soc Amer A Opt Image Sci Vis 32(5):886

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Medina J, Muller N, Roytelman I (2010) Demand response and distribution grid operations: opportunities and challenges. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 1(4):193–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mohsenian-Rad, Wong H, Jatskevich V, Schober R, Leon-Garcia (2010) Autonomous demand-side management based on game-theoretic energy consumption scheduling for the future smart grid. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 1(3):320–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Myerson RB, Satterthwaite MA (1983) Efficient mechanism for bilateral trading. J Econ Theory 29(2):265–281

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Nisan N, Ronen A (2011) Computationally feasible VCG mechanisms. In: Procs of ACM conference on electronic commerce, pp 242–252

  21. Palensky P, Dietrich D (2011) Demand side management: demand response, intelligent energy systems, and smart loads. IEEE Trans Indus Inf 7(3):381–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Pillai PS, Rao S (2016) Resource allocation in cloud computing using the uncertainty principle of game theory. IEEE Syst J 10(2):637–648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Rothkopf MH, Pekec A, Harstad RM (1998) Computationally manageable combinational auctions. Manag Sci 44(8):1131–1147

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Schülke A, Bauknecht, Haüssler (2010) Power demand shifting with smart consumers: a platform for power grid friendly consumption control strategies. In: Proc. of IEEE SmartGridComm, pp 437– 442

  25. Stacke F, Cuervo P (2008) A combined pool/bilateral/reserve electricity market operating under pay-as-bid pricing. IEEE Trans Power Syst 23(4):1601–1610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Yang D, Fang X, Xue G (2011) Truthful auction for cooperative communications. In: Procs of ACM interational symposium on mobile ad hoc networking and computing, pp 89–98

  27. Zaman S, Grosu D (2010) Combinatorial auction-based allocation of virtual machine instances in clouds. J Parallel Distrib Comput 73(4):495–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Zou X (2009) Double-sided auction mechanism design in electricity based on maximizing social welfare. Energ Polic 37(11):4231–4239

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Project supported by the National Nature Science Foundation of China (Grant No.61170201, No.61070133, No.61472344), Six talent peaks project in Jiangsu Province (Grant No.2011–DZXX–032), Jiangsu Science and Technology Project (Grant No. BY2015061-06,BY2015061-08), Yangzhou Science and Technology Project (Grant No. SXT20140048, SXT20150014, SXT201510013), Natural Science Foundation of the Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (Grant No.14KJB520041).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Junwu Zhu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhu, J., Song, H., Jiang, Y. et al. On truthful auction mechanisms for electricity allocation with multiple time slots. Multimed Tools Appl 77, 10753–10772 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-017-4855-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-017-4855-y

Keywords

Navigation