Advertisement

Multimedia Tools and Applications

, Volume 76, Issue 16, pp 17353–17370 | Cite as

Implementation of quality coverage map system via wireless communication service and big data analysis

  • Hae-Jong Joo
  • Hwa-Young JeongEmail author
Article
  • 251 Downloads

Abstract

The objective of this study is to realize the big data service quality maps of mobile communication companies, so that the users can objectively compare communication service qualities and make a reasonable choice. A measurement software was installed on smart phones for the purpose of measuring the service qualities of experience by the users. Furthermore, a measurement of five wireless internet services (broadband LTE, LTE-A, LTE, 3G, WiBro, and WiFi) was performed for evaluating the qualities of the service provider networks and the nationwide qualities. The measured data were stored and periodically uploaded to the database. These data were stored in PostGIS spatial DBMS through the connection of DBs, and they were connected to GeoServer for sharing and editing the geospatial data. The measured data were realized into coverage maps by using Google Maps. The coverage range was defined in Google Maps, and the defined range was divided by a specific cell (approximately 100 m x 100 m). The measured GPS ranges of each cell were retrieved from the quality data collection server table, and their average values were used for organizing and updating the coverage maps. These contents were stored in GeoServer, retrieved by database queries, and provided as visible layers in OpenLayers. In addition, statistical coverage maps via Flash maps were provided.

Keywords

Wireless communication service big data Coverage map Statistics map Service quality of experience Service quality 

References

  1. 1.
    Cho D-G, Park SC (2011) Design and implementation of quality measurement tools in wireless data services. KIIT 9(12):109–116Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cho M-H, Park J-H, Yoo Y-I, Kim J-S, Kim S-J (2003) The study on the technology of measuring QoS for Nespot. KICSGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dai Q, Lehnert R (2010) Impact of packet loss on the perceived video quality. IEEE INTERNETGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dunham MH, Kummer V (1999) Impact of mobility on transaction management. Proc Int Workshop Data Eng Wireless Mobile Access: 14–21Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ekman C, Fouch JC, Sullivan ED (2013) Wireless network performance analysis system. The U.S. Registered Patent: 0279354Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    ITU-R R.ec. BT.500-11 (2002) Methodology for the subjective assessment of the quality of television pictures. ITU-RGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    ITU-T J.143 (2000) User requirements for objective perceptual video quality measurements in digital cable television series J: Transmission of Television, Sound Programme and Other Multimedia Signals Measurement of the Quality of ServiceGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    ITU-T Rec. P.910 (1999) Subjective video quality assessment methods for multimedia applications. ITU-TGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Joo H, Hong B, Kim S (2013) A study on smart traffic analysis and smart device speed measurement plaform. Lect Notes Electr EngGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Joo H-J, Jung H-Y (2015) Quality measurement system for a wireless network based on the multimedia-data service. iMuTec, SpringerGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Joo HJ, Park YB (2005) Design of reliable query processing system in mobile database environments. The KIPS Trans Part D: 521–530Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kim D (2011) Everything on the Wireless Network(WIFI). midasbook. IncGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kim H, Choi S (2010) A study on a QoS/QoE correlation model for QoE evaluation on IPTV Service. IEEE ICACTGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lee J-H (2010) A study on communication service qualities of the three mobile communication companies. e-business Res 11(1)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lee J-W (2011) Mapping: a study on maps for concept visualization. Des Res 24(4)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Maier G, Schneider F, Feldmann A (2010) A first look at mobile hand-held device traffic. Passive and Active Measurement, Zurich, Switzerland: 161–170Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Shumeli R, Hadar O, Huber R, Maltz M, Huber M (2008) Effects of an encoding scheme on perceived video quality transmitted over lossy internet protocol networks. IEEE Tr Broadcast 54(3):628–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer Science & EngineeringDongguk UniversitySeoulSouth Korea
  2. 2.Department of Humanitas CollegeKyung Hee UniversitySeoulSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations