Assisting therapists in assessing small animal phobias by computer analysis of video-recorded sessions
- 249 Downloads
Behavioural Avoidance Tests (BATs) are commonly used for assessing phobias. While easy to deploy, these tests have some practical difficulties. For instance, therapists have to make distance estimations that are hard to do with accuracy and objectivity; or information regarding the performance of the patients (e.g. their walking pattern) is lost. To alleviate these difficulties, a computerized tool has been developed to extract the walking pattern of patients while approaching the phobic stimulus. From a video-recorded BAT session, two visual representations have been explored to compactly summarize the patient’s behavior: a static one (an image) and a dynamic one (an animation). A proof-of-concept prototype has been tested with 23 therapists. Most of the therapists preferred the animated representation, since it provides them with a better sense of the dynamics of how the patient really behaved. The participants agreed that this tool might be useful in assisting therapist when assessing phobia through BATs, since diagnostics could be made in a more accurate and objective way.
KeywordsSmall-animal phobia Computer vision Visual representations Therapists Clinical diagnostics
This work has been partly supported by Fundació Caixa-Castelló (through grant P1-1A2010-11) and Generalitat Valenciana (through grant PROMETEOII2014062).
- 6.Castelló V, Traver VJ, Serrano B, Montoliu R, Botella C (2015) Computer vision analysis of video-recorded sessions for BAT-based phobia assessment. Technical report, Institute of New Imaging Technologies. Universitat Jaume I, Castellón, SpainGoogle Scholar
- 7.Davis JW, Bobick AF (1997) The representation and recognition of human movement using temporal templates. In: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp 928–934Google Scholar
- 11.Hashemi J, Spina TV, Tepper M, Esler A, Morellas V, Papanikolopoulos N, Sapiro G (2012) A computer vision approach for the assessment of autism-related behavioral markers. In: 2012 IEEE International Conference on Development and Learning and Epigenetic Robotics, (ICDL-EPIROB 2012), pp 1–7Google Scholar
- 13.Kröse B, Oosterhout T, Kasteren T (2011) Activity monitoring systems in health care. In: Salah AA, Gevers T (eds) Computer Analysis of Human Behavior. Springer, London, pp 325–346Google Scholar
- 14.Manresa CY, Muntaner JJ, Arellano D (2013) A motion-based interface to control environmental stimulation for children with severe to profound disabilities. In: CHI’13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI EA ’13, pp 7–12Google Scholar
- 17.Mühlberger A, Sperber M, Wieser MJ, Pauli P (2008) A virtual reality behavior avoidance test (VR-BAT) for the assessment of spider phobia. J CyberTherapy Rehabil 1:147–158Google Scholar
- 23.Rehg JM (2011) Behavior imaging: Using computer vision to study autism. In: Proceedings of the IAPR Conference on Machine Vision Applications (IAPR MVA 2011), pp 14–21Google Scholar
- 24.Riva G (1997) Virtual reality as assessment tool in psychology. Stud Health Technol Inform 44:71–79Google Scholar
- 25.Sharp H, Rogers Y, Preece Jenny (2007). Wiley, Interaction design: Beyond human computer interactionGoogle Scholar
- 28.Valstar MF, Gunes H, Pantic M (2007) How to distinguish posed from spontaneous smiles using geometric features. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces, ICMI ’07. ACM, NY, USA, pp 38–45Google Scholar
- 30.Zivkovic Z (2004) Improved adaptive gausian mixture model for background subtraction. In: International Conference Pattern Recognition, pp 28–31Google Scholar