Skip to main content
Log in

SURF-based mammalian species identification system

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The development of tools for the automated identification of species will reduce the burden of routine identifications conducted by many biologists. The design of these tools is difficult because it depends on the proper extraction of those most relevant characteristics of the image, namely, those unequivocally identify its species. The appropriate software for such extraction does not exist in all cases. This work proposes an architecture for the automated identification of the skulls of different mammalian species belonging to the order Eulipotyphla, which includes shrews, moles and hedgehogs, among others. Our system determines nine species of this mammalian group using existing object recognition techniques, identifying them based on a set of images of the skulls of these species in a digital image database. To validate the proposed architecture, mobile and web applications have been developed. These applications use the image recognition technology provided by the OpenCV library for the detection of the keypoints and matching of the images. The application extracts the descriptor of the input image using the Speed Up Robust Features (SURF) method and compares this descriptor against the image database for matching using a Euclidean distance based on the nearest-neighbor approach. The initial tests have achieved a reliability of 98 %.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bay H, Ess A, Tuytelaars T, Van Gool L (2008) Speeded-up robust features (SURF). J Comput Vis Image Underst arch 110(3):346–359. doi:10.1007/11744023_32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bay H, Fasel B, Van Gool L (2006) Interactive museum guide: fast and robust recognition of museum objects. Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Mobile Vision (IMV’06), Graz, Austria.

  3. Bay H, Tuytelaars T, Van Gool L (2006) SURF: Speeded Up Robust Features. Proceedings of the ninth European Conference on Computer Vision, 3951:404–417. doi:10.1007/11744023_32

  4. Churchfield S (1990) The natural history of shrews. Comstock Publishing Associates, Ithaca, New York

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ke Y, Sukthankar R (2004) PCA-SIFT: a more distinctive representation for local image descriptors. Comput Vis Pattern Recognit. doi:10.1109/CVPR.2004.1315206

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kim Y, Park J, Moon I, Oh C (2014) Performance analysis of ORB image matching based on android. Int J Softw Eng Appl 8(3):11–20

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lee Y, Kim Y (2015) Efficient image retrieval using advanced SURF and DCD on mobile platform. Multimedia Tools and Appl 74:2289–2299. doi:10.1007/s11042-014-2129-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Loos A, Ernst A (2013) An automated chimpanzee identification system using face detection and recognition. EURASIP J Image and Video Process 2013(49):1–17. doi:10.1186/1687-5281-2013-49

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lowe D G (1999) Object recognition from local scale-invariant features. Proceedings of the Seventh IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, 2:1150–1157. doi:10.1109/ICCV.1999.790410

  10. Lowe D (2004) Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. Int J Comput Vis 60(2):91–110. doi:10.1023/B:VISI.0000029664.99615.94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mikolajczyk K, Schmid C (2005) A performance evaluation of local descriptors. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 27(10):1615–1630. doi:10.1109/TPAMI.2005.188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Murphy K, Torralba A, Eaton D, Freeman W (2006) Object detection and localization using local and global features. Toward Category-Level Object Recognition, LNCS 4170:382–400. doi:10.1007/11957959_20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rublee E, Rabaud V, Konolige K, Bradski G (2011) ORB: an efficient alternative to SIFT or SURF. In: IEEE international conference on computer vision (ICCV), pp. 2564–2571. doi:10.1109/ICCV.2011.6126544

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ruf B, Kokiopoulou E, Detyniecki M (2008) Mobile museum guide based on Fast SIFT recognition. In: Adaptive Multimedia Retrieval. Identifying, Summarizing, and Recommending Image and Music. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Volume 5811 of the series Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 170–183. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-14758-6_14

  15. Sixta T. Image and Video-based Recognition of Natural Objects. Diploma Thesis. Czech Technical University in Prague. Faculty of Electrical Engineering, pages 50, Prague, 2011.

  16. Swain M, Ballard D (1991) Color indexing. Int J Comput Vis 7(1):11–32. doi:10.1007/BF00130487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tuytelaars T, Mikolajczyk K (2008) Local invariant features detectors: a survey. J Found Trends in Comput, Graph Vis arch 3(3):177–280. doi:10.1561/0600000017a

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank A. Quiroga Bertolin for helpful support in the first prototype implementation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Beatriz Otero.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Otero, B., Rodriguez, E. & Ventura, J. SURF-based mammalian species identification system. Multimed Tools Appl 76, 10133–10147 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-016-3602-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-016-3602-0

Keywords

Navigation