Advertisement

Multimedia Tools and Applications

, Volume 76, Issue 8, pp 10959–10971 | Cite as

A discriminant sparse representation graph-based semi-supervised learning for hyperspectral image classification

  • Yuanjie Shao
  • Changxin Gao
  • Nong Sang
Article

Abstract

The classification of hyperspectral image with a paucity of labeled samples is a challenging task. In this paper, we present a discriminant sparse representation (DSR) graph for semi-supervised learning (SSL) to address this problem. For graph-based methods, how to construct a graph among the pixels is the key to a successful classification. Our graph construction method contains two steps. Sparse representation (SR) method is first employed to estimate the probability matrix of the pairwise pixels belonging to the same class, and then this probability matrix is integrated into the SR graph, which can be obtained by solving an 1 optimization problem, to form a DSR graph. Experiments on Hyperion and AVIRIS hyperspectral data show that our proposed method outperforms state of the art.

Keywords

Hyperspectral image classification Graph Semi-supervised learning (SSL) Sparse representation (SR) 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by the Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China No.61433007 and No.61401170.

References

  1. 1.
    Belkin M, Niyogi P (2003) Laplacian eigenmaps for dimensionality reduction and data representation. Neural Comput 15(6):1373–1396CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Belkin M, Niyogi P, Sindhwani V (2006) Manifold regularization: a geometric framework for learning from labeled and unlabeled examples. J Mach Learn Res 7:2399–2434MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Camps-Valls G, Bandos Marsheva T, Zhou D (2007) Semi-supervised graph-based hyperspectral image classification. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 45 (10):3044–3054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cheng H, Liu Z, Yang J (2009) Sparsity induced similarity measure for label propagation. In: Proceedings of IEEE 12th international conference of computer vision, Kyoto, pp 317–324Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gao Y, Ji R, Cui P, Dai Q, Hua G (2014) Hyperspectral image classification through bilayer graph based learning. IEEE Trans Image Process 23(7):2769–2778MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kim W, Crawford MM (2010) Adaptive classification for hyperspectral image data using manifold regularization kernel machines. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 48(11):4110–4121Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lunga D, Prasad S, Crawford MM, Ersoy O (2014) Manifold-learning-based feature extraction for classification of hyperspectral data: a review of advances in manifold learning. IEEE Signal Process Mag 31(1):55–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Roweis ST, Saul LK (2000) Nonlinear dimensionality reduction by locally linear embedding. Science 290(5500):2323–2326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wang F, Zhang C (2008) Label propagation through linear neighborhoods. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 20(1):55–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wang D, Lu H, Xiao Z, Yang MH (2015) Inverse sparse tracker with a locally weighted distance metric. IEEE Trans Image Process 24:2646–2657Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wang D, Lu H, Yang MH (2015) Kernel collaborative face recognition. Pattern Recogn:3025–3037Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wright J, Yang AY, Ganesh A, Sastry SS, Ma Y (2009) Robust face recognition via sparse representation. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 31 (2):210–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wu M, Schölkopf B (2007) Transductive classification via local learning regularization. In: Proceeding of 11th international conference of artificial intelligence statistics, pp 628–635Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yan S, Wang H (2009) Semi-supervised learning by sparse representation. In: Proceedings of SIAM international conference of data mining. SIAM, Sparks, pp 792–801Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhang L, Yang M, Feng X (2011) Sparse representation or collaborative representation: Which helps face recognition?. In: Proceedings of IEEE 12th international conference of computer vision. IEEE, pp 471–478Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zhou D, Bousquet O, Lal TN, Weston J, Schölkopf B (2004) Learning with local and global consistency. In: Thrun LSS, Scholkopf EB (eds) Proceedings of advance neural information processing system, vol 16, pp 321–328Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zhu X (2008) Semi-supervised learning literature survey. Tech. rep., Comput. Sci., Univ. Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA, TR-1530Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zhu X, Ghahramani Z (2002) Learning from labeled and unlabeled data with label propagation. Tech. rep., School Comput. Sci., Carnegie Mellon Univ., Pittsburgh, PA, USAGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zhu X, Lafferty J, Ghahramani Z (2003) Semi-supervised learning using gaussian fields and harmonic functions. In: Proceedings of 20th international conference of machine learning, Washington, DC, pp 912–919Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Science and Technology on Multi-spectral Information Processing LaboratorySchool of Automation Huazhong University of Science and TechnologyWuhanChina

Personalised recommendations