Skip to main content

An SNS-based model for finding collaborative partners

Abstract

This paper proposes a model, Recommendation of Appropriate Partners (RAP), used on a Social Networking Service (SNS) for locating appropriate “helpers” for users based on individual users’ Chain of Friends (CoF) relationships. Using the RAP model, individual users can participate in a collaborative online community in remote locations, whereby helpers are willing to help other users solve their tasks/problems, and it is intended that both the users and helpers gain knowledge from these interactive online sessions. An example of the RAP-based system was implemented to invite Program Committee members to an international conference. The system was evaluated and the experimental results show that our model is very effective for discovering collaboration partners and finding users with similar interests in order to create communities for providing future and longer-term helping exchange.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

References

  1. 1.

    Baier AC (1986) Trust and antitrust. Ethics 96:231–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Barile AL, Durso FT (2005) Computer-mediated communication in collaborative writing. Comput Hum Behav 18:173–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Boyd DM, Ellison NB (2008) Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship. J Comput-Mediat Commun 13(1):210–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Brown BB (1989) The role of peer groups in adolescents’ adjustment to secondary school. In: Belle D (ed) Children’s social networks and social supports. Wiley, New York, p 188–215

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Chang W-L, Lee C-Y (2013) Trust as a learning facilitator that affects students’ learning performance in the Facebook community: an investigation in a business planning writing course. Comput Educ 62:320–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Colquitt JA, Scott BA, LePine JA (2007) Trust, trustworthiness, and trust propensity: a meta-analytic test of their unique relationships with risk taking and job performance. J Appl Psychol 92(4):909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Dinet J, Vivian R (2012) The impact of friendship on synchronous collaborative retrieval. Br J Educ Technol 43(3):439–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    El-Bishouty MM, Ogata H, Rahman S, Yano Y (2010) Social knowledge awareness map for computer supported ubiquitous learning environment. Educ Technol Soc 13(4):27–37

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Eveland DJ, Brown W, Mattocks J (1994) The role of “help networks” in facilitating use of CSCW tools. In Proc. of Computer Supported Cooperative Work, ACM Press, p 265–274

  10. 10.

    Facebook Fact Sheet (2014) available as http://newsroom.fb.com/Key-Facts

  11. 11.

    Guzman ESD, Sharmin M, Bailey BP (2007) “Should I call now?” Understanding what context is considered when deciding whether to initiate remote communication via mobile devices. In Proc. of GI, p 143–155

  12. 12.

    Heo GM, Lee R (2013) Blogs and social network sites as activity systems: exploring adult informal learning process through activity theory framework. Educ Technol Soc 16(4):133–145

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Howes C (2008) Friends and peers. Encycl Infant Early Child Dev 6:552–562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Hsu MH, Ju TL, Yen CH, Chang CM (2007) Knowledge sharing behavior in virtual communities: the relationship between trust, self-efficacy, and outcome expectations. Int J Hum Comput Stud 65(2):153–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Joinson AN (2008) Looking at’, “ Looking up ” or “ Keeping up with ” People ? Motives and Uses of Facebook. Social Networks 5

  16. 16.

    Kelley PG et al (2011) An investigation into facebook friend grouping. In Proc. of Interact, p 216–233

  17. 17.

    Lampe C, Ellison N, Steinfield C (2007) A familiar Face(book): profile elements as signals in an online social network. SIGCHI, ACM Press, New York, p 435–444

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Milgram S (1967) The small world problem. Psychol Today 2:60–67

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Ozenc FK, Farnham SD (2011) Life “modes” in social media. In Proc. Of CHI, 561–570

  20. 20.

    Raento M et al (2005) ContextPhone: a prototyping platform for context-aware mobile applications. IEEE Pervasive Comput 4(2):51–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Rollett H, Lux M, Strohmaier M, Dösinger G, Tochtermann K (2007) The web 2.0 way of learning with technologies. Int J Learn Technol 3(1):87–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Stecher K, Counts S (2008) Thin slices of online profile attributes. In Proc. of AAAI, 127–135

  23. 23.

    Tan Q, Kinshuk, Jeng Y-L, Huang Y-M (2010) A collaborative mobile virtual system based on location based dynamic grouping. In Proc. of IEEE International Conference on advanced Learning Technologies, p 16–18

  24. 24.

    Yin C, Ogata H, Yano Y (2004) JAPELAS: supporting japanese polite expressions learning using PDA towards ubiquitous learning. J Inf Syst Educ 3(1):33–39

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Yin C, Dong Y, Tabata Y, Ogata H (2012) Recommendation of helpers based on personal connections in mobile learning. In Proc. of International Conference on Wireless, Mobile and Ubiquitous Technologies in Education, p 137–141

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 25750084.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chengjiu Yin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yin, C., Yau, J.YK., Hwang, GJ. et al. An SNS-based model for finding collaborative partners. Multimed Tools Appl 76, 11531–11545 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-015-2480-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • Social networking
  • Personal relationship
  • Collaboration
  • Search engine