Multimedia Tools and Applications

, Volume 73, Issue 2, pp 961–976 | Cite as

Efficient visualization of 3D models on hardware-limited portable devices

Article

Abstract

Managing the geometry of a 3D scene efficiently is a key aspect of an interactive 3D application. This aspect is more important if we target at portable devices, which have limited hardware capabilities. Developing new means for improving the interaction with 3D content in mobile devices is key. The aim of this work is to present a technique which can manage the level-of-detail of 3D meshes in portable devices. This solution has been devised considering the restrictions that this kind of devices poses. The results section shows how the integration has been successful while obtaining good performance.

Keywords

3D Level-of-detail Mobile Tablet 

References

  1. 1.
    Baek N, Lee H (2012) OpenGL ES 1.1 implementation based on OpenGL. Multimedia Tools Appl 57:669–685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Boubekeur T, Schlick C (2008) A flexible kernel for adaptive mesh refinement on GPU. Comput Graph Forum 27(1):102–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Castello P, Chover M, Sbert M, Feixas M (2007) Applications of information theory to computer graphics (part 7). In: Eurographics tutorial notes, vol 2, pp 891–902Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chan MC, Hu SY, Jiang JR (2009) Secure peer-to-peer 3d streaming. Multimedia Tools Appl 45:369–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Clark J (1976) Hierarchical geometric models for visible surface algorithms. Commun ACM 10(19):547–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cohen J, Olano M, Manocha D (1998) Appearance-preserving simplification. In: SIGGRAPH ’98, pp 115–122Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cyberware (2012) 3D scanner samples. http://www.cyberware.com/products/scanners/msSamples.html (accessed 25 June 2012)
  8. 8.
    Giegl M, Wimmer M (2007) Unpopping: solving the image-space blend problem for smooth discrete lod transitions. Comput Graph Forum 26(1):46–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gonzalez C, Gumbau J, Chover M, Castello P (2008) Mesh simplification for interactive applications. In: WSCG, pp 87–94Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hoppe H, DeRose T, Duchamp T, McDonald J, Stuetzle W (1993) Mesh optimization. In: Computer graphics 27 (annual conference series), pp 19–26Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hu L, Sander PV, Hoppe H (2009) Parallel view-dependent refinement of progressive meshes. In: I3D ’09: Proceedings of the 2009 symposium on interactive 3D graphics and games, pp 169–176Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kim SK, An SO, Hong M, Park DS, Kang SJ (2010) Decimation of human face model for real-time animation in intelligent multimedia systems. Multimedia Tools Appl 47:147–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lindstrom P, Turk G (2000) Image-driven simplification. ACM Trans Graph 19(3):204–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Luebke D, Hallen B (2001) Perceptually-driven simplification for interactive rendering. In: 12th Eurographics workshop on rendering, pp 223–234Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Luebke D, Reddy M, Cohen J, Varshney A, Watson B, Huebner R (2003) Level of detail for 3D graphics. Morgan Kaufmann, San MateoGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ramos F, Chover M (2004) Lodstrips: level of detail strips. In: ICCS, vol 3039, pp 107–114Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ripolles O, Chover M (2008) Optimizing the management of continuous level of detail models on GPU. Comput Graph 32(3):307–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ripolles O, Chover M, Ramos F (2011) Visualization of level-of-detail meshes on the GPU. Vis Comput 27:793–809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sander P, Snyder J, Gortler S, Hoppe H (2001) Texture mapping progressive meshes. In: SIGGRAPH 2001, pp 409–416Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Shafae M, Pajarola R (2003) Dstrips: dynamic triangle strips for real-time mesh simplification and rendering. In: Pacific Graphics conference, pp 271–280. Strips, MultiresolutionGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Southern R, Gain J (2003) Creation and control of real-time continuous level of detail on programmable graphics hardware. Comput Graph Forum 22(1):35–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Stanford (2012) The Stanford 3D scanning repository. http://www.graphics.stanford.edu/data/3Dscanrep (accessed 25 June 2012)
  23. 23.
    Turchyn P (2007) Memory-efficient sliding window progressive meshes. In: Proc. of 15-th international conference in central Europe on computer graphics, visualization and computer vision (WSCG 2007), pp 33–40Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wikipedia (2011) Apple a4. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_A4 (accessed 10 December 2011)
  25. 25.
    Wikipedia (2011) Apple a5. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_A5 (accessed 10 December 2011)
  26. 26.
    Xia J, El-Sana J, Varshney A (1997) Adaptative real-time level-of-detail-based rendering for polygonal models. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph 3(2):171–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zach C (2002) Integration of geomorphing into level of detail management for realtime rendering. In: SCCG 2002Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Francisco Ramos
    • 1
  • Oscar Ripolles
    • 2
  • Miguel Chover
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of New Imaging TechnologiesUniversitat Jaume ICastellonSpain
  2. 2.Neuroelectrics BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations